Skip to main content

%1

Session Description
Congress granted creditors a right to an accelerated recovery of their claims through FRBP 3001. This rule is the foundation for selling a bankruptcy claim but, until recently, the integrity and liquidity of the claims market was challenged by an absence of the typical features of modern capital markets. Few creditors were able to identify potential purchasers, conduct price discovery and maximize competition for their claims. Online marketplaces developed, making a global market and rapid price discovery easily accessible, and allowing unrestricted competitive pressures to inform bid/ask price disclosure and immediately actionable supply and demand. Although the market has undergone a significant transformation, a number of recent cases have tested the rules and procedures of bankruptcy courts, clerks and claim administrators to properly manage the tens of millions of claims, and hundreds of billions of dollars owed annually to creditors who enjoy a right to liquidity.
Learning Outcomes
• Understanding of the background/context for FRBP 3001
• Understanding of historical market characteristics and functionality
• Understanding of the emergence of online marketplaces
• Discussion of recent cases and the impediments to improved market functionality
• Discussion of opportunities for further market development and improvement
Target Audience
Creditor
Suggested Speakers
Brian
Davidoff
bdavidoff@greenbergglusker.com
Matthew
Sedigh
matt@x-claim.com
Andrew
Glantz
andrew@x-claim.com
First Name
Brian
Last Name
Davidoff
Email
bdavidoff@greenbergglusker.com
Firm
Greenberg Glusker LLP
Session Description
Debtor estates and other distressed stakeholders can monetize formerly contaminated parcels which have no higher or better use than solar by leasing or selling those assets to specialized brownfields-to-solar developers. These niche developers can buy suitable parcels outright or offer twenty-year leases which can be transferred with the property. The Inflation Reduction Act and renewable energy-friendly states provide significant financial incentives which allow for generous lease rates. Bankruptcy trustees, debtor estates, creditors and other stakeholders have begun exploring this monetization strategy, which can be accomplished out of court, as long as the assets are at least partially remediated.
Learning Outcomes
What is the brownfields solar financial model, whether through lease or acquisition, and how much revenue would it generate in a sample project?
What types of real estate assets are suitable for solar siting (and no other, higher/better uses)?
What geographical locations/states provide the best financial incentives (tax incentives, rec programs, high power rates) to generate the highest lease rate or purchase price for a trustee, debtor estate or other stakeholder?
What are the relevant provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act?
What are some of the relevant provisions in states with favorable policies?
How can a trustee, debtor estate or other stakeholder mitigate the environmental risk associated with brownfields solar projects?
How can public sector creditors properly dispose of or monetize through lease brownfield properties where the property owner is missing or refuses to appear in court proceedings?
Can environmental liabilities be discharged under section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code? Is that necessary in the context of developing solar on brownfields?
Target Audience
Debtor
Suggested Speakers
Christy
Searl
christy@acpowerllc.com
First Name
Christy
Last Name
Searl
Email
christy@acpowerllc.com
Firm
AC Power LLC