The presentation has two parts. In Part One, the panelists will use hypotheticals drawn from actual cases, first to discuss common themes and issues that arise in Ponzi Scheme cases, then to illustrate what differentiates Ponzi Scheme cases from other kinds of fraud-based bankruptcies. This includes: the unique role of investors as both victims and tools of the fraud; how, when, and why arguably legitimate businesses might be recognized as Ponzi Schemes; the judge's role as facilitator; and common litigation tools and tactics utilized to ensure equal treatment of creditors. Part Two focuses on the doctrinal challenges and possible misfits involved in utilizing fraudulent transfer law to resolve such cases.
Participants will learn the basics of Ponzi Scheme cases, including: how they typically arrive in bankruptcy court; common issues that arise; common litigation tools and strategies; and methods for managing distributions to creditors. From there, participants will be asked to think critically about all of the above, and to focus on whether the means by which attorneys and judges have resolved these cases really have a firm foundation in the law.
Business
This session will provide a comprehensive understanding of the Business Judgment Rule (BJR) as it applies to corporate governance, with a specific focus on how directors and officers can navigate potential litigation. The session will start with a foundational overview of the BJR, followed by an in-depth analysis of the key legal cases that have shaped its application. Additionally, the session will delve into the strategies for advising corporate clients—particularly directors and officers—on how to avoid becoming targets of litigation, including the role of independent board directors in mitigating risk.
Session Structure and Key Topics:
1. Introduction to the Business Judgment Rule (BJR)
Objective: Provide a foundational understanding of the BJR and its role in corporate governance.
- Definition of the BJR and its purpose in protecting directors and officers from liability.
--- The BJR presumption: when courts defer to the decisions of corporate leaders.
--- Key elements required to invoke the BJR: good faith, rationality, and lack of conflicts of interest.
--- Key areas where the BJR applies: financial decisions, strategic direction, and operational oversight.
2. Key Legal Cases Shaping the Business Judgment Rule
Objective: Explore the landmark cases that have defined and evolved the application of the BJR.
- Smith v. Van Gorkom (1985): The duty of care in decision-making and its relation to the BJR.
- Aronson v. Lewis (1984): The standard for judging board decisions and establishing the BJR presumption.
- In re Caremark International Inc. Derivative Litigation (1996): The BJR's application in oversight and monitoring duties.
- Stone v. Ritter (2006): Examining the role of good faith and the implications for directors' oversight responsibilities.
- Directors' duty of loyalty vs. duty of care: Understanding the balance and how courts distinguish between them.
3. Litigating Business Judgment: Defending and Pursuing Claims
Objective: Offer insight into the litigation landscape for D&O claims and how the BJR impacts defense and pursuit of litigation.
- Litigating under the BJR: When the rule can be overcome by plaintiffs and how courts assess the decision-making process of directors.
- Strategies for defending directors and officers in lawsuits, including the use of the BJR as a key defense.
- How plaintiffs attempt to overcome the BJR (e.g., allegations of bad faith, lack of independence, or conflicts of interest).
- Case studies and trends in shareholder derivative suits and class actions.
4. How to Advise Directors and Officers to Avoid Becoming Targets of Litigation
Objective: Discuss proactive strategies for corporate advisors to help directors and officers avoid litigation exposure.
- Best practices for documenting decisions to ensure alignment with the BJR.
- The importance of maintaining a robust conflict-of-interest policy and board independence.
- Key governance practices that mitigate risks: regular board evaluations, clear delegation of authority, and transparency in decision-making.
- Ensuring compliance with statutory and fiduciary duties—particularly in distressed situations.
- The role of internal and external advisors in helping directors navigate complex situations.
5. The Role of Independent Board Directors in Mitigating Risk
Objective: Highlight the importance of independent directors in protecting the organization and its leadership from litigation.
- Defining the role and responsibilities of independent board members.
- How independent directors help reinforce the BJR in decision-making processes.
- The critical role of independent directors in distressed or bankruptcy situations.
- Best practices for selecting, empowering, and working with independent board directors to safeguard against personal liability.
Target Audience:
General Business Bankruptcy Counsel | Corporate Governance Professionals | Directors and Officers (D&O) | Litigators specializing in corporate governance and D&O cases | Financial Advisors specializing in distressed situations and workouts | CROs
Learning Objectives:
- Gain a comprehensive understanding of the Business Judgment Rule and its importance in corporate governance.
- Analyze major legal cases and their impact on the application of the BJR.
- Develop strategies for defending and pursuing litigation involving directors and officers.
- Learn proactive strategies for advising directors and officers to minimize the risk of personal liability and litigation.
- Understand the importance of independent board directors in mitigating risks for directors and officers.
Business
Suggested Speakers
This session will introduce participants to the very hiogh likelihood that digital assets could be a part of a bankruptcy estate given the rapid growth in the use of digital assets to transact business and in the number of people in the United States that own digital assets. Participants will be made aware of the resources, tools, and professional services available to locate, track, quantify, value and recover digital assets for the bankruptcy estate.
1. Participants will gain a working understanding of blockchain technology, cryptocurrencies and other digital assets and their rapid adoption by individuals and businesses.
2. Participants will learn to identify signs that a party may possess digital assets and will be familiar with the resources available to aid in discovering and identifying digital asset ownership.
3. Participants will learn about the techniques and tools available to trace and recover digital asset transactions.
4. Participants will learn the basic issues and challenges in valuing digital assets.
Creditor
During the Covid Pandemic, the Federal , State and Local governments make billions of dollars in loans to all sizes of business. These programs were rolled out very quickly and the potential for fraud was huge. Now as things shake out, various of the entities that provided the funds are discovering fraud, of all shapes and sizes and bringing suits to recover wrongfully made or fraudulently obtained loans. This session will discuss the various programs, the litigation that is now being pursued by the various "lending sources" and how and when Bankruptcy is being used or implicated by this litigation. This session should address loans made to all size businesses - from the mom and pop business to the multi-million or billion businesses and the various frauds that have been discovered .
Attendees will understand the various types of frauds and other issues that have arisen as a result of these "lending" programs being used improperly.
Attendees will understand the various ways in which Bankruptcy can or may be used to either pursue recovery or avoid recovery as a result of the fraud and other improper ways in which these programs were used and abused.
Debtor
Janet
Baer
janet_baer@ilnb.uscourts.gov
US Bankruptcy Court, ND IL
