Skip to main content

%1

Experts on New ABI Podcast Examine the Second Circuit's Ruling on GM Successor Liability and Ramifications for Future "Free and Clear" 363 Sales

Submitted by ckanon@abi.org on

Alexandria, Va. — The latest American Bankruptcy Institute (ABI) podcast features ABI Editor-at-Large Bill Rochelle talking with Prof. Stephen Lubben of Seton Hall University School of Law about the ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denying General Motors’ escape from liability for ignition-switch defects that generated nationwide litigation. Prof. Lubben followed the case and has written extensively on GM’s bankruptcy on both Credit Slips and the New York Times DealBook blog.

Old GM, named General Motors Corp. before bankruptcy, was in severe financial distress and likely would have liquidated absent financial assistance from the federal government before and after its chapter 11 filing in June 2009. In the bankruptcy court’s 2009 sale approval order, New GM agreed to assume responsibility only for specified liabilities, including warranty claims, accidents occurring after the sale, and Lemon Law claims. Otherwise, the sale was supposedly free and clear of claims, thus broadly immunizing New GM from successor liability claims. In early 2014 – after plan confirmation in 2011 – New GM initiated recalls of millions of vehicles. It was later discovered that Old GM had known about a defect in its ignition switches for several years before bankruptcy. The bankruptcy court had held that pre-closing accident claims and claims for economic loss were barred by the sale order. The Second Circuit reversed that holding on due process grounds.

"The one clear lesson from this case is that if you want to have very good, clean 363 sale, you really have to push your client, especially on the debtor's side, to make sure that they are disclosing everything that they need to be disclosing," Lubben said.

Click here to listen to the podcast.

ABI’s podcast series features interviews with important figures or experts discussing timely bankruptcy topics or issues. ABI podcasts are freely available to members, the public and the press, and can be accessed on ABI’s Newsroom website.

###

ABI is the largest multi-disciplinary, nonpartisan organization dedicated to research and education on matters related to insolvency. ABI was founded in 1982 to provide Congress and the public with unbiased analysis of bankruptcy issues. The ABI membership includes more than 12,000 attorneys, accountants, bankers, judges, professors, lenders, turnaround specialists and other bankruptcy professionals, providing a forum for the exchange of ideas and information. For additional information on ABI, visit www.abiworld.org. For additional conference information, visit http://www.abi.org/calendar-of-events

Payday Loan Limits May Cut Abuse but Leave Some Borrowers Looking

Submitted by ckanon@abi.org on
Canton, Ohio, is a nexus of the payday lending industry, The New York Times reported on Friday. At one such business, a consumer stopped in to do his biweekly banking: Nearly every payday, he cashes his check, pays off his last loan in full and takes out a new one against his next paycheck. The amount he borrows varies, but it is typically around $500, for which he pays a fee of $73 — a 380 percent annual interest rate. However, federal regulators view these businesses as part of a predatory industry that is ripe for reform and a crackdown. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is poised to adopt strict new national rules that will curtail payday lending. This will limit the number of loans that can be taken in quick succession and will force companies like Advance America to check that their borrowers have the means to repay them. But lenders — and even some consumer advocates who favor stronger regulation — are grappling with the uncomfortable question of what will happen to customers if a financial lifeline that they rely on is cut off. Ohio has some of the highest per-capita payday loan use in the nation and the rates that its lenders charge are also among the highest. At least 14 states have banned high-interest payday lending, and for a time, it looked as if Ohio would join them. In a 2008 referendum, voters overwhelmingly backed a law limiting interest rates. But lenders found loopholes, and their loan volume grew: To skirt the rate caps, payday lenders register as mortgage lenders or as credit service organizations, which are allowed to charge fees for finding loans for their customers.

Former Subprime Lender NovaStar Files for Bankruptcy

Submitted by ckanon@abi.org on
The company formerly known as NovaStar Financial Inc., which before the housing crash made billions of dollars in risky mortgage loans, has sought chapter 11 protection, The Wall Street Journal reported on Friday. The company is hoping to continue its operations while it works to develop a plan to restructure its debts and resolve pending litigation related to past mortgage activities. Before the 2008 financial crisis, Novation — then known as NovaStar — originated, purchased, sold, invested in, securitized and sold subprime mortgage loans and mortgage securities. At its peak, NovaStar originated more than $11 billion in mortgage loans a year, which it then bundled together into securities that it sold to investors. When the housing bubble burst, NovaStar stopped making new loans and sold off its servicing portfolio of existing loans. The company later renamed itself Novation and now focuses on investing in various businesses. In January, it sold its majority interest in cloud-based telecommunications platform developer Corvisa Inc. Despite its new name and focus, the company’s old mortgage business continues to be embroiled in litigation tied to the housing market’s collapse. At least three significant lawsuits are pending, although the chapter 11 filing puts an automatic halt to those actions.
Article Tags

Port Authority to Pay $12.3 Million to Bankrupt World Trade Center Contractor

Submitted by ckanon@abi.org on
The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey has reached a deal to end an $87 million payment dispute with a Canadian construction firm that helped build the One World Trade Center skyscraper in lower Manhattan, The Wall Street Journal reported today. The deal calls for Port Authority officials to pay $12.3 million to Ontario-based Collavino Construction Co. The money will enable Collavino Construction officials to make final payments to subcontractors who were hired for the World Trade Center project. A Collavino Construction subsidiary filed for bankruptcy on Oct. 17, 2014, as officials battled the Port Authority over expensive delays during construction of the 104-story project, which opened several weeks after the filing. Collavino Construction itself filed several months later. 
Article Tags