Skip to main content

%1

Session Description
The focus of the panel would be to identify uniquely Canadian distressed deal structures and litigation techniques that could be imported to the American restructuring practice. Would cover developments from coast to coast by including at least 3 Canadian practitioners from the West Coast, Central Canada and Quebec would be selected once the audience was determined. For example key points would be: could you get a reverse vesting order under Chapter 11?
Learning Outcomes
Practictioners will learn new techniques and strategies unique to Canada.
Target Audience
Business
First Name
Natasha
Last Name
MacParland
Email
nmacparland@dwpv.com
Firm
Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP
Session Description
Join our panel of industry experts for an insightful discussion on navigating the complex landscape of accounts receivable (A/R) management. This session aims to provide attendees with comprehensive insights into key considerations, challenges, and innovative strategies within the A/R space.

The primary focus of this panel is to explore how organizations can maximize value in their A/R portfolios. Our experts will delve into crucial aspects of A/R management, offering attendees a holistic understanding of risk analysis, portfolio purchasing, liquidation, debt collection, and international recovery.

Key Points and Supporting Topics:

• Risk Analysis in A/R Portfolios: Understand the methodologies and techniques employed for accurate risk analysis. Explore the impact of customer payment patterns, industry trends, and economic factors on portfolio performance.
• Portfolio Purchasing and Liquidation Strategies: Gain insights into successful portfolio management, acquisition, and liquidation. Learn innovative approaches to handling principal investments and overseeing significant assets.
• Effective B2B Debt Collection and International Recovery: Discover advanced analytics and modeling strategies for enhancing debt collection processes. Navigate the challenges of international debt recovery with industry-tested expertise.
• Comprehensive Approach to Bridging Business and Credit Lenders: Delve into strategies that bridge the gap between businesses and credit lenders. Maximize the value of assets within the A/R space through thoughtful and comprehensive approaches.

Learning Outcomes
Attendees will leave this panel discussion equipped with actionable insights, best practices, and a deeper understanding of the evolving landscape of A/R management. Whether you are involved in risk assessment, portfolio management, or debt recovery, this session promises to be a valuable resource for professionals seeking to optimize their approach to accounts receivable.
Target Audience
Business
Suggested Speakers
Jay
Stone
JStone@hilcoglobal.com
Buddy
Beaman
BBeaman@hilcoglobal.com
First Name
Julia
Last Name
Lechowicz
Email
jlechowicz@hilcoglobal.com
Firm
Hilco Global

Aggrieved Lenders Struggle to Unwind ‘Creditor Violence’ Deals

Submitted by ckanon@abi.org on
For corporate lenders, clashes with fellow creditors can pay off — especially if the borrower is destined for bankruptcy, WSJPro Bankruptcy reported. The recent chapter 11 case of Revlon Inc. shows why. A rescue financing deal completed in 2020 gave investment firms Angelo Gordon & Co., Glendon Capital Management LLC and other lenders dibs on the company’s intellectual property, and their collateral rights were honored in the chapter 11 case the cosmetics giant subsequently filed. Those lenders will recover an estimated 78 cents on the dollar, according to Revlon’s bankruptcy filings. A competing lender group including Symphony Asset Management and HPS Investment Partners LLC was shut out of the 2020 deal and failed in its attempts to unwind it. They will now recover roughly a fifth of their claims when Revlon leaves chapter 11, court filings show. The outcome marks one of the first times that bankruptcy courts have sorted out the so-called creditor-on-creditor violence that has become more common among distressed borrowers. Companies in recent years have become increasingly creative in designing rescue deals to stay out of bankruptcy, sometimes by shifting collateral from one creditor group to another to secure new borrowing and buy time for a turnaround. By looking for, and taking advantage of, loopholes in existing credit agreements that can either benefit themselves or give them an advantage over other financiers, lenders can allow new money to enter the capital structure with some new seniority. That means that struggling businesses and their owners, often private-equity backers, can come up with new funding, potentially without the portfolio companies filing for bankruptcy.

CFPB Seeks Ban Against Operator of Student Loan Debt Relief Scam Reboot

Submitted by jcarman@abi.org on

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has taken action against the owner of a student-loan debt relief company for allegedly withdrawing hundreds of thousands of dollars from student borrowers’ bank accounts, without authorization, according to a press release on the agency’s website. The CFPB alleges that Frank Gebase, Jr. controlled a company that took the borrowers’ money after obtaining their names and account information from a previous student-loan debt-relief scammer that the CFPB shut down. The CFPB’s proposed settlement, if entered by the court, would ban Gebase from the debt-relief industry and order him to pay a penalty. On March 30, 2016, the CFPB ordered Student Aid Institute to shut down its debt-relief operations and rescind all of its consumer agreements. Gebase had leased office space to Student Aid Institute, and he was a longtime associate of its principal. In 2016, Gebase founded Processingstudentloans in San Diego, and he was the founder, sole owner, CEO, and sole corporate officer. The CFPB alleges that from approximately May 20, 2016 to April 5, 2017, Processingstudentloans was a non-bank provider of student-loan debt-relief services. As alleged in the complaint, without authorization, Processingstudentloans collected recurring fees from customers, typically $39 per month, stealing hundreds of thousands of dollars in total fees from hundreds of student loan borrowers. In addition to controlling Processingstudentloans and facilitating the debits, Gebase was aware or should have known that the debits were unauthorized and unlawful. By April 2017, under this scheme, Gebase’s company had unlawfully debited more than $240,000 from hundreds of student borrowers’ accounts.