%1
Modifying the Stay Doesn’t Relinquish Jurisdiction Entirely over the Dispute
Lack of Financial Distress Doesn’t Divest a Court of Subject Matter Jurisdiction
A Summary of Intellectual Property Infringement and Bankruptcy
The Bankruptcy Code, in its current form, anticipates the inclusion of intellectual property (IP) within the property of an estate. Not only is IP defined [1] in the Bankruptcy Code, it is also explicitly considered in terms of executory contracts. [2] While “executory contract” is not specifically defined in the Code, the U.S.
Cursing the Debtor by Itself Isn’t a Violation of the Automatic Stay
Finality in Bankruptcy Appeals: Ritzen and Its Aftermath
In Ritzen Grp. Inc. v. Jackson Masonry LLC,[1] the U.S. Supreme Court definitively established that an order denying a motion for relief from the automatic stay under Bankruptcy Code § 362(d) is a final order that may be — and must be — immediately appealed. In the years following Ritzen, almost every circuit court has had an opportunity to ring in on finality issues. This article surveys notable circuit court opinions applying Ritzen in contexts ranging from discovery motions to claim objections.