On an issue dividing the courts, the Seventh Circuit rules that an obligation to repay a domestic support obligation is a dischargeable debt, not a nondischargeable DSO.
If a lower court buys an argument that’s clearly wrong, is the argument nonetheless ‘objectively reasonable?’ And does Taggart apply to an automatic stay violation?
Please note that in order to view the content for the
Bankruptcy Headlines
please
log in
if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may
Become an ABI Member