To amend the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act to prohibit debt collectors from collecting, or attempting to collect, on a debt of a consumer with respect to which the statute of limitations has expired, and for other purposes.
To amend the Truth in Lending Act to extend the consumer credit protections provided to members of the Armed Forces and their dependents under title 10, United States Code, to all consumers.
To amend the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act to prohibit debt collectors from collecting on certain Federal student loan debt when the borrower would not be required to make payments under an income-driven repayment plan, and for other purposes.
To amend the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act to provide a timetable for verification of medical debt and to increase the efficiency of credit markets with more perfect information, to prohibit consumer reporting agencies from issuing consumer reports containing information about debts related to medically necessary procedure, about and for other purposes.
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to include court-ordered receivership in the list of actions resulting in a change of ownership of institutions of higher education.
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to permit a Federal student loan borrower to elect to terminate repayment pursuant to income-based repayment and repay such loan under any other repayment plan for which the borrower is otherwise eligible.
Lawyers for former Corinthian College students are asking a federal judge in San Francisco to increase the amount of sanctions the Department of Education must pay for violating a court order barring the collection of certain student loan payments, the National Law Journal reported. Lawyers at Housing and Economic Rights Advocates in Oakland and the Legal Services Center of Harvard Law School have asked U.S. District Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim of the Northern District of California to reconsider the $100,000 sanction order she issued in October. In May, Judge Kim issued an order putting a hold on all government collection on loans that were subject to “borrower defense” to repayment, or the contention that borrowers were defrauded by the for-profit school. The judge held Education Secretary Betsy DeVos and the Education Department in contempt and sanctioned them in October for continuing to collect on loans despite her order. In court papers, the plaintiffs’ lawyers contend that records provided by the government at the time of her October ruling were “grossly inaccurate.” They contend that the government’s representations that it had violated the order 16,000 times by seeking to collect from individuals covered by Judge Kim’s injunction was “off by almost 300 percent” and that the government has collected more than $21 million from individuals who are lawfully covered by the injunction since it went into place.
Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), the chairwoman of the House Financial Services Committee, said that she plans to advance a bipartisan bill to impose a strict limit on interest rates when Congress reconvenes next year, The Hill reported. Waters said that her committee will take up the Veterans and Consumers Fair Credit Act, which would impose a national cap on interest rates at 36 percent. Under federal law, lenders are banned from offering loans to active-duty military members with interest rates higher than 36 percent. But the bill, spearheaded by 16 Democrats and one Republican, would expand that protection to all Americans. Waters and dozens of Democrats have been fiercely critical of the “payday” loan industry, which offers loans at high interest rates and repayment deadlines as short as two weeks. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) issued a rule in 2017 to impose strict limits on payday loans, but the regulation was gutted under Trump-appointed officials in 2019. It’s unlikely that a hard limit on payday loan interest rates would clear a Republican-controlled Senate. GOP lawmakers have been critical of Democratic efforts to curb payday lending through regulation and insist short-term, high-interest loans are a crucial financial lifeline for low-income Americans. But Waters, her Democratic colleagues and consumer advocates argue that payday loans are often used to trap vulnerable customers in cyclical debt that could decimate their financial health and credit.