Skip to main content

%1

July Total Bankruptcy Filings Increase 3 Percent from Last Year, Commercial Filings Increase 4 Percent

Submitted by jhartgen@abi.org on

Total U.S. bankruptcy filings increased 3 percent in July 2019 from July 2018, according to data provided by Epiq Systems, Inc. Total filings registered 64,283 in July 2019, up from the July 2018 total of 62,241. The 61,025 consumer filings in July also represented a 3 percent increase from the previous year’s consumer total of 59,110. July 2019 business filings increased 4 percent to 3,258 from July 2018’s business total of 3,131. The 417 commercial chapter 11 filings in July 2019 were a 1 percent increase over the 413 commercial chapter 11 filings last July.

July Total Bankruptcy Filings Increase 3 Percent from Last Year, Commercial Filings Increase 4 Percent

Submitted by jhartgen@abi.org on

Alexandria, Va. Total U.S. bankruptcy filings increased 3 percent in July 2019 from July 2018, according to data provided by Epiq Systems, Inc. Total filings registered 64,283 in July 2019, up from the July 2018 total of 62,241. The 61,025 consumer filings in July also represented a 3 percent increase from the previous year’s consumer total of 59,110. July 2019 business filings increased 4 percent to 3,258 from July 2018’s business total of 3,131. The 417 commercial chapter 11 filings in July 2019 were a 1 percent increase over the 413 commercial chapter 11 filings last July.

“Amid increasing debt loads and growing global challenges, bankruptcy provides financial shelter for distressed consumers and businesses,” said ABI Executive Director Samuel J. Gerdano. “Congress recently passed legislation that will provide better access to the financial fresh start of bankruptcy for struggling small businesses, veterans and family farmers.”

The U.S. Senate on Aug. 1 passed the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 (H.R. 3311), the Honoring American Veterans in Extreme Need Act of 2019 (H.R. 2938) and the Family Farmer Relief Act of 2019 (H.R. 2336) by a voice vote. The three bills modernize the Bankruptcy Code to ensure that struggling veterans, Main Street businesses and family farmers have access to better tools for achieving a financial fresh start. ABI testified in support of the three bills, and the legislation will now proceed to President Trump for signature into law.

July’s total bankruptcy filings increased 5 percent in July from last month’s total of 61,079. Consumer filings also rose 5 percent in July from the 58,003 filings in June.

Commercial filings represented a 6 percent increase over last month’s total of 3,076. However, commercial chapter 11 filings represented a 2 percent decrease from the June total of 425.

The average nationwide per capita bankruptcy-filing rate in July was 2.50 (total filings per 1,000 per population), a slight decrease from the filing rate of 2.51 during the first six months of 2019. Average total filings per day in July 2019 were 2,962, a 4 percent decrease from the 3,072 total daily filings in July 2018. States with the highest per capita filing rates (total filings per 1,000 population) in July 2019 were:

1. Alabama (5.61)

2. Tennessee (5.39)

3. Georgia (4.31)

4. Mississippi (4.25)

5. Nevada (3.79)

ABI has partnered with Epiq Systems, Inc. in order to provide the most current bankruptcy filing data for analysts, researchers and members of the news media. Epiq Systems is a leading provider of managed technology for the global legal profession. To view the full monthly statistic tables provided by Epiq Systems, be sure to visit ABI’s Newsroom.

For further information about the statistics or additional requests, please contact ABI Public Affairs Manager John Hartgen at 703-894-5935 or jhartgen@abiworld.org.

###

ABI is the largest multi-disciplinary, nonpartisan organization dedicated to research and education on matters related to insolvency. ABI was founded in 1982 to provide Congress and the public with unbiased analysis of bankruptcy issues. The ABI membership includes nearly 11,000 attorneys, accountants, bankers, judges, professors, lenders, turnaround specialists and other bankruptcy professionals, providing a forum for the exchange of ideas and information. For additional information on ABI, visit www.abi.org. For additional conference information, visit http://www.abi.org/calendar-of-events.

Epiq Systems is a leading provider of managed technology for the global legal profession. Epiq Systems offers innovative technology solutions for electronic discovery, document review, legal notification, claims administration and controlled disbursement of funds. Epiq System’s clients include leading law firms, corporate legal departments, bankruptcy trustees, government agencies, mortgage processors, financial institutions, and other professional advisors who require innovative technology, responsive service and deep subject-matter expertise. For more information on Epiq Systems, Inc., please visit http://www.epiqsystems.com.

Individuals with Two-Year Gap in Medical Coverage Nearly Twice as Likely to File for Bankruptcy, According to Research Included in Summer ABI Law Review

Submitted by jhartgen@abi.org on

Alexandria, Va. — Individuals who experienced a gap in medical care coverage over a two-year period were roughly twice as likely to file for bankruptcy as those who retained continuous coverage, according to an article in the Summer 2019 edition of the American Bankruptcy Institute (ABI) Law Review (Volume 27, No. 2). In their article “Moving Beyond Medical Debt,” Prof. Brook E. Gotberg of the University of Missouri School of Law (Columbia, Mo.) and Prof. Michael D. Sousa of the University of Denver Sturm College of Law (Denver, Colo.) detail their research looking at data from a national survey of adults from 2004 through 2014 that indicates that the principal predictor of consumer bankruptcy is a lapse in medical insurance coverage.

Gotberg and Sousa's study was funded in 2016 by ABI's Anthony H.N. Schnelling Endowment Fund to examine whether the expansion of Medicaid through the Affordable Care Act (ACA) has had a correlative effect on the rate of consumer bankruptcy filings across the country. “Most existing empirical studies attempt to quantify the percentage of consumer bankruptcies that are ‘caused’ by unmanageable medical indebtedness,” Gotberg and Sousa write. “This article addresses what we believe to be a more significant line of empirical inquiry, namely, the connection between health insurance coverage and consumer bankruptcy as a more precise measurement of how national health insurance programs may or may not affect bankruptcy filing rates.”

“These findings contribute to the ongoing debate regarding the Affordable Care Act and the provision of health insurance to low-income Americans, and the role consistent health insurance coverage plays in relation to the consumer bankruptcy system.”

Other articles included in the Summer 2019 ABI Law Review include:

  • “Credit Card Debt and Consumer Bankruptcy: Can We ‘Nudge’ Our Way Out?” by Prof. Robert J. Landry III of Jacksonville State University's School of Business and Industry (Jacksonville, Ala.).
  • “‘The Supreme Court’s Jevic Decision Regarding Structured Dismissals in Bankruptcy Is Wrong. What's a Lawyer to Do?” by Prof. Jeffrey Davis of the University of Florida Levin College of Law (Gainesville, Fla.).
  • “Escape from Pandemonium: Reconciling § 363(F) and § 365(H) in Qualitech’s Shadow and Spanish Peaks’ Wake” by Amir Shachmurove of Troutman Sanders (Washington, D.C.).

ABI’s Law Review, published in conjunction with St. Johns University School of Law in Jamaica, N.Y., is among the most cited and respected scholarly publications in the bankruptcy community. Now in its 27th year, it has the largest circulation of any bankruptcy law review. Past issues of the Law Review have focused on a variety of timely insolvency issues, including chapter 11 reform, distressed sectors, single-asset cases, consumer bankruptcy, revised Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code and other topics.

Members of the press looking to obtain any of the articles from the Summer 2019 issue should contact John Hartgen at 703-894-5935 or jhartgen@abiworld.org.

###

ABI is the largest multi-disciplinary, nonpartisan organization dedicated to research and education on matters related to insolvency. ABI was founded in 1982 to provide Congress and the public with unbiased analysis of bankruptcy issues. The ABI membership includes nearly 11,000 attorneys, accountants, bankers, judges, professors, lenders, turnaround specialists and other bankruptcy professionals, providing a forum for the exchange of ideas and information. For additional information on ABI, visit www.abiworld.org. For additional conference information, visit http://www.abi.org/calendar-of-events.

 

Bill Raising Debt Ceiling for Family Farm Bankruptcies Heads to White House

Submitted by jhartgen@abi.org on

With farm bankruptcies rising and agricultural debt loads soaring, the U.S. Senate on Thursday passed a bill that will make it easier for more farmers with larger amounts of debt to file for bankruptcy protection, Reuters reported. The bipartisan bill — H.R. 2336, the "Family Farmer Relief Act of 2019" — raises the ceiling on how much debt producers who file for chapter 12 bankruptcy can have, to $10 million from the previous $4 million. It costs far more now to run a U.S. farm than it did 30 years ago, according to U.S. Department of Agriculture data. Without this change to the law, bankruptcy experts say, farmers whose debts exceed $4.15 million are forced to use chapter 11 protection, which is more costly and onerous. ABI testified in support of the bill. A Reuters analysis of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation data found that — after years of building up their farm lending portfolios in the wake of the U.S. housing meltdown of the late 2000s — top Wall Street banks are now pulling back from the sector as farm incomes are falling and farm loan delinquency rates are rising. Read more

In addition to the Family Farmer Relief Act, the Senate on Thursday also passed H.R. 3311, the Small Business Reorganization Act; H.R. 2938, the Honoring American Veterans in Extreme Need Act (HAVEN Act); and H.R. 3304, the National Guard and Reservist Debt Relief Extension Act. ABI testified in support of H.R. 2938, H.R. 3311 and H.R. 2336. All the bills passed the U.S. House of Representatives and are non-controversial. The bills received unanimous consent to proceed to passage. The legislation will now be sent to President Trump to be signed into law. Click here to read ABI’s press release. 

Senate Passes Four Bipartisan, Bicameral Bankruptcy Bills

Submitted by jhartgen@abi.org on

August 1, 2019

 
ABI Bankruptcy Brief
 
 
 
 
NEWS AND ANALYSIS

Senate Passes Four Bipartisan, Bicameral Bankruptcy Bills

The U.S. Senate today passed four bipartisan and bicameral bankruptcy bills before adjourning for its August recess. The bills are H.R. 3311, the Small Business Reorganization Act; H.R. 2336, the Family Farmer Relief Act; H.R. 2938, the Honoring American Veterans in Extreme Need Act (HAVEN Act); and H.R. 3304, the National Guard and Reservist Debt Relief Extension Act. ABI testified in support of H.R. 3311, H.R. 2336 and H.R. 2938. All the bills passed the U.S. House of Representatives last week and are non-controversial. The bills received unanimous consent to proceed to passage. The legislation will now be sent to President Trump to be signed into law. Click here to read ABI’s press release.

Consumer Groups Seek Extension of FDCPA Comment Period

Consumer advocacy groups have formally requested a two-month extension — to Oct. 21 — on the comment period for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s proposed debt-collection rule, Auto Finance News reported. The comment period is currently set to expire on Aug. 19. Seven advocacy groups signed the letter, citing the long and complicated nature of the proposal. “The proposal’s broad and potential impact — on virtually every person in this country — adds to the complexity of analyzing and commenting on the implications for different constituencies,” the letter said. In fact, the consumer advocacy groups hold that these rules affect not only consumers with debt, but “anyone who may mistakenly be the subject of debt collection communications and litigation against the wrong person, wrong number or email address, or debts paid long ago,” making it difficult to respond adequately. Further, the letter cites the CFPB’s other activities as having consumed many of the resources of the consumer advocacy groups, including a proposal to rescind much of the payday loan rule, request for comment on overdraft opt-in rules, and the proposed rule under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act. As of yesterday, 1,978 comments on the proposal had been submitted on the CFPB’s website.

Tapping Homes for Cash to Get Tougher Under New FHA Limits

The Trump administration is moving to restrict mortgage refinancings in which borrowers withdraw cash, the latest effort to curb the federal government’s exposure to potential defaults, the Wall Street Journal reported. The Federal Housing Administration, an arm of the Department of Housing and Urban Development that insures loans for mostly first-time buyers, announced today that it will limit cash-out refinancings in its program. Borrowers will be able to pull cash out only when the new loan amounts to 80 percent of the value of the home or less, down from 85 percent. The policy change, expected to take effect in September, follows a sharp rise in the use of cash-out refinancings over the past several years. Officials believe this has added risk to the $1.3 trillion government mortgage program. Borrowers aren’t tapping their homes for nearly as much cash as they did before the financial crisis. But rising home prices have rewarded owners with more equity in their homes, and many are turning it into cash to make home improvements or pay bills. In the FHA program, there were nearly 151,000 cash-out refinances in the 12 months that ended in September, versus roughly 43,000 during the same period five years earlier. (Subscription required.)

Commentary: Mortgage Rates Are Already Lower, but Not Providing a Spark to Homebuying*

Cheaper mortgages are usually a boon to the housing market, but this year, a sharp drop in mortgage rates hasn’t provided much of a lift, according to a New York Times commentary. Consumer borrowing costs, including mortgage rates, are heavily influenced by the market for government bonds, and yields on those bonds have been falling this year. Similarly, the rate on the 30-year fixed mortgage rate is down more than one percentage point, to 3.75 percent last week, according to Freddie Mac. Over the last 30 years, the rate has averaged about 6.25 percent. So the current rates might reasonably have been expected to spark a flurry of refinancing and home buying. But, because of rising home prices, there has been no boom so far. Through June, sales of existing homes were down 2 percent from a year earlier, and investment in residential structures had declined for six straight quarters. Sales of newly built homes remain well below their recent peak in late 2017. The housing market has traditionally been one of the most important channels by which the Fed’s rates can influence the economy because it can spur construction employment, sales of appliances and furniture, and services such as landscaping, all of which multiply the economic impact of a home’s purchase. But the math facing prospective American home buyers is daunting. Since June 2009, when the U.S. economy started its current expansion, the median price of existing homes has risen nearly 60 percent, far outpacing the 24 percent gain in median weekly earnings.

*The views expressed in this commentary are from the author/publication cited, are meant for informative purposes only, and are not an official position of ABI.

Sign up Today to Receive Rochelle’s Daily Wire by E-mail!
Have you signed up for Rochelle’s Daily Wire in the ABI Newsroom? Receive Bill Rochelle’s exclusive perspectives and analyses of important case decisions via e-mail!

Tap into Rochelle’s Daily Wire via the ABI Newsroom and Twitter!

BLOG EXCHANGE

New on ABI’s Bankruptcy Blog Exchange: HUD Plan Would Raise Bar for Claims of Fair-Lending Abuse

Under a proposal yet to be officially unveiled, plaintiffs relying on the so-called “disparate impact” doctrine would have to show a more direct link between a lender’s policy and discriminatory effect, according to a recent blog post.

To read more on this blog and all others on the ABI Blog Exchange, please click here.

 
© 2019 American Bankruptcy Institute
All Rights Reserved.
66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 600
Alexandria, VA 22314
 

Bill Would Let Cash-Strapped Injured Veterans Keep Disability Money During Bankruptcy

Submitted by jhartgen@abi.org on

Congress passed a bill that would extend a lifeline to financially struggling injured veterans, enabling them to spend disability payments instead of using them to pay down debt in bankruptcy protection, WSJ Pro Bankruptcy reported. The Senate yesterday passed four bankruptcy bills that included the Honoring American Veterans in Extreme Need Act (HAVEN Act) that consumer advocates say fixes a mistake written into a 2005 overhaul of the country’s bankruptcy rules. The House passed the bill last week. It now goes to the White House for President Trump’s signature where he is expected to sign the bill. The newly passed bill excludes disability payments from the Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense to veterans or their dependent survivors from the classification of disposable income. The bill would provide relief for military veterans, who face higher rates of homelessness, mental-health problems and unaffordable debt, including from medical expenses for combat-related injuries. A 2017 study from Stanford University found that veterans make up a larger portion of people who have filed for bankruptcy protection. Read more

The Senate yesterday also passed H.R. 3311, the Small Business Reorganization Act; H.R. 2336, the Family Farmer Relief Act; and H.R. 3304, the National Guard and Reservist Debt Relief Extension Act. ABI testified in support of the HAVEN Act (H.R. 2938), H.R. 3311 and H.R. 2336. All the bills passed the U.S. House of Representatives last week and are non-controversial. The bills received unanimous consent to proceed to passage. The legislation will now be sent to President Trump to be signed into law. Click here to read ABI’s press release. 

U.S. Appeals Court Won’t Make Student Loans Easier to Discharge

Submitted by jhartgen@abi.org on

A Texas woman can’t unload thousands of dollars in unpaid student loans through bankruptcy, a federal appeals court said, a setback for consumer lawyers hoping her case could weaken the high bar for student borrowers to discharge educational debt, WSJ Pro Bankruptcy reported. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on Tuesday ruled against Vera Frances Thomas, who has struggled to maintain employment because of a degenerative nerve disease and sought relief from more than $7,800 in student debt. The ruling comes as some judges, experts and politicians re-evaluate the legal hurdles preventing individuals in difficult financial straits from using bankruptcy to leave behind student loans. The appellate court defended a legal test dating back to the late 1980s that requires borrowers seeking education-related bankruptcy relief to show they are totally incapable of repaying their student debt. Consumer advocates who filed papers supporting Thomas said that the test is outdated and came about before significant changes to modern student loan programs. “The consequence of the…test is that sympathetic debtors like Ms. Thomas are held to the same standard as debtors who are less sympathetic. But that is an outcome for Congress to address, should it desire,” wrote Circuit Judge Edith H. Jones. Read more.

For further analysis on this case, be sure to read today’s Rochelle’s Daily Wire column