Skip to main content

%1

Biden Seeks $2.5 Trillion in Corporate Tax Hikes to Fully Pay for Infrastructure

Submitted by jhartgen@abi.org on

The Treasury Department on Wednesday released a report detailing President Biden’s proposals to increase corporate taxes to fund infrastructure investments, The Hill reported. Department officials said the proposals would raise about $2.5 trillion over 15 years and fully offset the cost of the new infrastructure spending. During a call with reporters, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen argued that the plan will be beneficial for both the federal government and businesses. “Tax reform is not a zero-sum game, with corporations on one side and government on the other. There are policies that are mutually beneficial,” Yellen said. “Win-win is a very overused phrase, but we have a real one in front of us now.” Biden last week released a $2.25 trillion infrastructure plan that would be paid for over 15 years through corporate tax changes, including an increase in the corporate rate from 21 percent to 28 percent. The plan has quickly faced opposition from Republicans and business groups, who argue it will make the U.S. business climate less competitive. It will need widespread support from congressional Democrats to be enacted, given that Democrats only narrowly control the House and Senate. Read more.

In related news, one million jobs would be lost in the first two years if the corporate tax rate increased to 28 percent and other policies went into effect, according to a new study from the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM), The Hill reported. NAM, in a study conducted by Rice University economists, calculated the impact of increasing the corporate tax rate to 28 percent, increasing the top marginal tax rate, repealing the 20 percent pass-through deduction, and eliminating certain expensing provisions. Biden’s proposed $2.25 trillion infrastructure package would increase the corporate tax rate to 28 percent and establish a minimum global tax. The 2017 GOP tax law lowered the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent. The NAM study found that global domestic product (GDP) would be down by $117 billion by 2023, $190 billion in 2026, and by $119 billion in 2031. “[T]his study tells us quantitatively what manufacturers from coast to coast will tell you qualitatively: increasing the tax burden on companies in America means fewer American jobs. One million jobs would be lost in the first two years, to be exact,” NAM President and CEO Jay Timmons said in a statement. It also calculated that ordinary capital, or investments in equipment and structures, would be $80 billion less in 2023, $83 billion less in 2026, and and $66 billion less in 2031. Read more.

Article Tags

IRS Chief Says Agency Has No Present Plans to Extend Tax-Filing Season

Submitted by jhartgen@abi.org on

IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig said Tuesday that the agency doesn't have any current plans to extend the tax-filing deadline nationally after a group of House Democrats urged him to do so last week, The Hill reported. "We have no present plans to extend the filing season," Rettig said at a hearing held by the House Appropriations Committee's financial services and general government subpanel. "Keep in mind, it creates a lot of confusion for taxpayers. It also backs up the Internal Revenue Service." Last year's tax-filing season was extended from April 15 to July 15 because of the coronavirus pandemic. A group of Democrats on the House Ways and Means Committee last week requested that the agency take similar action again this year. The lawmakers said that many taxpayers are facing the same pandemic-related challenges that prompted last year's extension, and noted that this year's filing season started later than usual.

Article Tags

California’s 40-Year-Old Tax Revolt Survives a Counterattack

Submitted by ckanon@abi.org on
For 40 years, the legacy of Proposition 13, a landmark California law that limits property tax increases, has shaped state politics. The measure weathered various legislative and legal challenges, including a trip to the Supreme Court, and came to be considered untouchable. Now the law has survived perhaps its biggest test after California voters rejected a ballot initiative that would have undone a portion of Proposition 13, The New York Times reported. The new law, Proposition 15, would have removed commercial properties like office buildings and industrial parks from Proposition 13’s limits, and it would have given labor and progressive groups a long-sought victory to increase funding for education and local services. The Associated Press called the result of the Nov. 3 vote on the measure on Tuesday night, when the count was 51.8 percent to 48.2 percent against it. “This is an important moment in California political history — the biggest attempt to reform Proposition 13,” said Manuel Pastor, an author and sociology professor at the University of Southern California. “Given that this is the third rail of California politics, it actually came pretty close with very significant headwinds including a recession, and the limits the pandemic placed on door-knocking and other high-touch voter contact.” Proposition 15 would have raised $6.5 billion to $11.5 billion a year for public schools, community colleges and city and county governments, according to a nonpartisan state agency. Proponents had promoted the measure as a needed investment in public services when the economy and budgets are under stress. The measure had won prominent endorsements. Opponents, including business associations and large property owners, said the measure would hurt small businesses and open the door to raising taxes on residential properties as well.

U.S. Companies Get Tax Reprieve in IRS Foreign-Income Rules

Submitted by ckanon@abi.org on
The Treasury Department relaxed some tax rules on U.S.-based multinational corporations, issuing final regulations that give relief to companies operating in high-tax foreign countries, The Wall Street Journal reported. The final rules gave companies some but not all of what they wanted and will reduce the U.S. tax burden on companies operating in places such as Germany and Japan. The change may encourage them to invest more in such high-tax places, according to an analysis by the Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service. Companies can now seek retroactive benefits, going back to periods before the proposed regulations came out in June 2019. They also have somewhat looser rules about how their foreign subsidiaries are defined. The rules implement the Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (GILTI) system that Congress created in the 2017 tax law. That requires U.S. companies to pay additional U.S. taxes if their foreign rates are below certain thresholds. It was designed to prevent companies from concentrating profits in low-tax jurisdictions. Lawmakers and companies say they thought the GILTI tax wouldn’t apply if companies paid rates above 13.125%. But there were technicalities in how the new U.S. system interacted with longstanding U.S. tax rules.

Trump Demands Payroll Tax Cut While GOP Eyes Benefit Cuts for Unemployed

Submitted by ckanon@abi.org on
President Trump sought to draw a hard line on the coronavirus relief bill Sunday, saying that it must include a payroll tax cut and liability protections for businesses, as lawmakers prepare to plunge into negotiations over unemployment benefits and other key provisions in coming days, The Washington Post reported. “I would consider not signing it if we don’t have a payroll tax cut,” President Trump said in an interview on “Fox News Sunday.” Democrats strongly oppose a payroll tax cut, and some Republicans have been cool to it, but Trump said “a lot of Republicans like it.” President Trump also said that “we do need some kind of immunity” in the bill. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has repeatedly insisted the legislation must include liability protections for businesses, health-care providers, schools and others. Democrats oppose this, too. President Trump’s comments come as Senate Republicans are exploring new limits on emergency unemployment benefits for people who were high earners before losing their jobs. If the White House and Senate GOP priorities make it into the bill, the legislation would effectively cut taxes for people who have jobs while cutting benefits for the unemployed. Sen. McConnell is expected to introduce an approximately $1 trillion stimulus bill in coming days that will include a limited extension of the federal unemployment benefits approved by Congress in March. Those benefits are set to expire as soon as this week.

Neiman Marcus Delays Bankruptcy Hearing as Plan Hits Roadblocks

Submitted by jhartgen@abi.org on

Objections from dissenting creditors are threatening to delay Neiman Marcus’s bankruptcy restructuring after the group said an acceptable plan must preserve the right of minority stakeholders to pursue legal claims related to a 2018 asset transfer, Bloomberg News reported. The retailer asked U.S. Bankruptcy Judge David Jones to postpone a hearing on certain details of its plan to July 21 as it looks to address concerns from lower-ranking creditors. Neiman filed for chapter 11 protection on May 7 after striking an agreement to let senior creditors take control of the chain. But lower-ranking creditors say the court must first allow a full investigation into a controversial asset transfer that shifted value out of investors’ reach and lowered recovery values. The company’s plan, however, includes broad liability releases that would protect previous owners and directors, including Neiman’s private equity owners Ares Management Corp. and the Canadian Pension Plan Investment Board, from future claims. The lower-ranking creditors drew up their own restructuring plan, which differs from Neiman’s namely in its treatment of the future liabilities, and asked the court for permission to formally submit it as an alternative. The rescheduled hearing, which was originally set to take place on Friday, will include a response to that request, according to an agenda filed with the court.