Skip to main content

%1

Lehman Loses Court Bid for Revised Ruling on 8.6 Billion JPMorgan Suit

Submitted by webadmin on

Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. lost a bid for a revised ruling on its $8.6 billion lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase & Co. when the judge said that he was satisfied with the way he had dealt with the issues, Bloomberg News reported today. Bankruptcy Judge James Peck in April dismissed some of the defunct investment bank's claims, leaving others in place. Lehman, which is gathering money for a second payment to creditors, said that it might gain hundreds of millions of dollars if he reinstated some claims he dismissed. Judge Peck declined in an order signed yesterday. In a July 12 hearing, Judge Peck told Lehman that it had other ways of recovering money from JPMorgan.

Knight Capital Reaches Rescue Deal with Investor Group

Submitted by webadmin on

The Knight Capital Group reached a deal on Sunday to secure a financial lifeline from an investor group that included TD Ameritrade and the Blackstone Group, capping its efforts to stay alive, The New York Times reported yesterday. The lifeline came together days after the trading firm disclosed a $440 million trading loss tied to a glitch in its software that sent shares in 148 companies gyrating on Wednesday. Under the terms of the plan, the new investors would receive securities that give them the right to buy new shares in Knight at a price of roughly $1.50 each. The rescue package, which was arranged by the Jefferies Group and is worth about $400 million, will significantly dilute the holdings of existing shareholders, with the new investors owning roughly 70 percent of the firm, but it will leave Knight alive and independent, averting a potentially messy bankruptcy.

Ex-UBS Executives Go to Trial in Bond Bid-Rigging Case

Submitted by webadmin on

Peter Ghavami, former co-head of UBS AG's municipal-derivatives group, goes on trial today with two ex-colleagues in a bond bid-rigging probe in which banks have paid more than $700 million to settle U.S. claims, Bloomberg News reported today. Ghavami, Gary Heinz and Michael Welty are charged in a six- count indictment with "long-running conspiracies and schemes to defraud" municipal-bond issuers and U.S. tax authorities by fixing prices on agreements for investing the proceeds of municipal-bond sales.Prosecutors expect to prove “the knowing and active participation” of UBS, JPMorgan Chase & Co., Bank of America Corp. and General Electric Co. in the fraud alleged against the three former UBS executives, according to a July 6 court filing. Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, UBS, Wells Fargo & Co. and GE Funding Capital Market Services, a former unit, have paid more than $700 million to settle claims by the government. Beverly Hills, Calif.-based CDR and 13 individuals have pleaded guilty to criminal charges.

New York Lender Files Libor Lawsuit

Submitted by webadmin on

In the latest sign of the potential legal vulnerability facing banks ensnared in the world-wide probe of interest-rate manipulation, a New York lender alleges in a lawsuit that it was cheated out of interest income because rates on loans tied to Libor were "artificially" depressed, the Wall Street Journal reported today. The lawsuit effectively argues that the alleged manipulation short-changed lenders by helping borrowers pay less for mortgages and other loans. Berkshire Bank, with 11 branches in New York and New Jersey and about $881 million in assets, claims in a proposed class-action lawsuit in U.S. District Court in New York that "tens, if not hundreds, of billions of dollars" of loans made or sold in the state were affected by rigging the London interbank offered rate. The lawsuit, filed last week, targets as defendants the 16 banks on the panel that set the U.S. dollar London interbank offered rate from August 2007 to May 2010.

MBIA Tells Court Restructuring Protects All Policyholders

Submitted by webadmin on

MBIA Inc.'s 2009 restructuring was approved by New York regulators because it protected all policyholders, including the banks challenging the decision, a lawyer for the bond insurer told a trial judge, Bloomberg News reported yesterday. Banks suing MBIA cannot prove their argument that the approval of the restructuring was "arbitrary and capricious," said Marc Kasowitz, an attorney with Kasowitz Benson Torres & Friedman LLP representing Armonk, New York-based MBIA. Justice Barbara Kapnick of the New York Supreme Court is hearing a nonjury trial on claims by Bank of America Corp. and Societe Generale SA that the February 2009 approval of MBIA's proposal by then-Superintendent Eric Dinallo was based on inaccurate and incomplete information and should be annulled.

Senate Panel to Examine Derivatives Reform and Improving Market Oversight

Submitted by webadmin on

The Senate Banking Committee's Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Subcommittee will hold a hearing at 10 a.m. ET today titled "Implementing Derivatives Reform: Reducing Systemic Risk and Improving Market Oversight." Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Mary Schapiro and Commodity Futures Trading Commission Chairman are the witnesses scheduled to appear before the committee. For prepared witness testimony, please click here: http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&…

Justice Department Opens JPMorgan Inquiry

Submitted by webadmin on



ABI Bankruptcy Brief | May 15, 2012


 


  

May 15, 2012

 

home  |  chart of the day  |  blogs  |  bankruptcy code and rules  |  statistics  |  legislative news  |  volo
  NEWS AND ANALYSIS   

JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OPENS JPMORGAN INQUIRY



The Justice Department has opened an inquiry into JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s $2 billion-plus trading loss, the Wall Street Journal reported today. The probe is at an early stage and it is not clear what possible legal violation federal investigators may be focusing on. Last week, the Securities and Exchange Commission began its own review of the matter, examining the company's accounting and disclosures to investors. The trading loss has aroused intense scrutiny in Washington, D.C., where some lawmakers have been fighting efforts by big banks to delay or scale back regulations mandated by the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial overhaul. Read more. (Subscription required.)

ANALYSIS: BANKS TREAD A FINE LINE IN TRADING



When JPMorgan Chase revealed its $2 billion loss last week, it looked as though the big Wall Street banks were up to their old tricks, using their government-backed funds to make risky trades in a misguided effort to improve their profits, according to an analysis in the New York Times' Dealbook Blog on Sunday. While few other banks pursue the complex strategies that led to JPMorgan's losses, many traditional lenders regularly buy and sell securities, and make bets with derivatives, as part of their core operations. Financial firms say that such activities allow them to earn a basic return on the deposits they collect and to offset risks on their balance sheets. These widespread trading practices are creating a headache for regulators, who are trying to devise new rules to prevent another financial crisis. Regulators are putting the finishing touches on the so-called Volcker Rule, which would ban banks from making speculative bets with their own money. However, regulators face a dilemma when faced with the question of "what constitutes proprietary trading?" Such activities are easy to spot when financial firms run independent trading units devoted to making profits. Already, most big banks have moved to exit these businesses in preparation for the Volcker Rule. Regulators, however, are having a harder time telling when other trading activities — like market-making and portfolio hedging — cross the line. Big banks, even those with little presence on Wall Street, contend that their trading activities are part of prudent risk-management. Without the ability to invest in bonds and other securities, these companies argue that they would not be able to make loans or extend credit as easily. Read more.

DOJ NOT KEEPING STATS ON FINANCIAL CRISIS CONVICTIONS



The Department of Justice has been short on answers for congressional inquiries looking to find out how many executives have been convicted of criminal wrongdoing related to the financial crisis of 2008-09, as the department said that it does not keep count of the numbers of board-level prosecutions, according to a report today in the Wall Street Journal. In a response earlier this month to a March request from Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), the Justice Department said that it does not hold information on defendants' business titles. "Consequently, we are unable to generate the [requested] comprehensive list" of Wall Street convictions stemming from the 2008 meltdown, the letter from the Department of Justice to Grassley said. Prof. William Black, a former bank regulator, said that the government used to keep these figures. He points to a 1993 report by the Government Accountability Office on the savings-and-loan crisis of a generation ago. The report said that "30 percent of those prosecuted are the major corporate insiders—CEOs, presidents, shareholders, directors and officers" of the affected firms. Some other law-enforcement agencies are keeping a similar tally for the latest financial crisis. The Securities and Exchange Commission highlights on its website its civil crisis-related enforcement actions against senior corporate officers—a total of 55 so far. Read more. (Subscription required.)

In related news, the House Financial Services Committee will hold a hearing on Thursday titled "Examining the Settlement Practices of U.S. Financial Regulators." Click here to view the witness list.

COMMENTARY: SAYING NO TO STATE BAILOUTS



States that have followed Europe's economic policy model of unbridled spending are getting Europe's economic results: low growth and looming fiscal catastrophe, according to a commentary by Rep. Kevin Brady (R-Texas) and Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.), members of the Joint Economic Committee (JEC), in today's Wall Street Journal. Compared with the 10 U.S. states with the lowest rates of economic growth since 1990, according to a JEC report released today, the states with the highest rates of growth had smaller unfunded pension ratios (by 26 percent); lower debt ratios (by 18 percent); less tax revenue collected (by 22 percent); and lower welfare benefits (by 31 percent). The report also shows that over the last decade, states with no income tax have much higher rates of job growth and population growth than states with the highest income taxes. The fuse on the U.S. debt bomb—which according to the National Bureau of Economic Research may be armed with as much as a $211 trillion fiscal shortfall—may prove to be the states' public-employee pension systems, according to the commentary. Years of overly optimistic growth projections, underfunding and overpromising by politicians, according to the commentary, have rendered many of these public pension systems toxic assets on states' books. Read more. (Subscription required.)

REGISTER FOR THE LABOR & EMPLOYMENT COMMITTEE'S "EVOLVING LABOR ISSUES IN CHAPTER 11" WEBINAR



Make sure to mark your calendars for May 23 from 2-3:30 p.m. ET for the ABI Labor and Employment Committee's "Evolving Labor Issues in Chapter 11" Webinar. A panel of experts will be discussing recent developments in several large complex bankruptcy cases, including Hostess, Kodak, Nortel and American Airlines. The expert panel includes Babette A. Ceccotti of Cohen, Weiss & Simon LLP (New York), former chief counsel of the PBGC Jeffrey B. Cohen of Bailey & Ehrenberg PLLC (Washington, D.C.), Marc Kieselstein of Kirkland & Ellis LLP (New York) and Ron E. Meisler of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP.
Issues to be discussed include:

• Hostess' efforts to eliminate their multi-employer pension plan contribution liability through motions to reject their labor agreements under Section 1113.

• Kodak's attempt to terminate retiree health benefits.

• The effect of the automatic stay upon efforts by the U.K. Pension Protection Fund and the U.K. Nortel Pension Plan to enforce its powers under the U.K. Pensions Act.

• American Airlines' efforts to reduce legacy costs in bankruptcy.

Click here to register.

U.S. TRUSTEE PROGRAM RE-OPENS COMMENT PERIOD ON PROPOSED GUIDELINES FOR ATTORNEY COMPENSATION IN LARGE CHAPTER 11 CASES



The U.S. Trustee Program has re-opened the comment period until May 21, 2012, on proposed guidelines for reviewing applications for attorney compensation in large chapter 11 cases ("fee guidelines"). The USTP also scheduled a public meeting for June 4, 2012, at the U.S. Department of Justice in Washington, D.C. on the proposed fee guidelines. Click here for more information on submitting comments or attending the public hearing.

ABI IN-DEPTH

JUNE 5 WEBINAR WILL EXAMINE HOW TO HANDLE AN ADMINISTRATIVELY INSOLVENT ESTATE



Panelists from one of the top-rated sessions at the 2011 Winter Leadership Conference are going to reconvene for an ABI and West LegalEd Center webinar on June 5 titled, "Handling the Administratively Insolvent Estate- What to Do When Your Chapter 11 Goes South." CLE credit will be available for the webinar, which will last from 11 a.m. - 12:30 p.m. ET.

Speakers include:

Robert J. Feinstein of Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP (New York)

Cathy Rae Hershcopf of Cooley LLP (New York)

Robert L. LeHane of Kelley Drye & Warren LLP (New York)

Robert J. Keach of Bernstein Shur (Portland, Maine) will be the moderator for the webinar.

The webinar costs $115, and purchase provides online access for 180 days. If you are purchasing a live webcast, you will receive complimentary access to the on-demand version for 180 days once it becomes available. Click here for more information.

LATEST CASE SUMMARY ON VOLO: MCNEAL V. GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC (IN RE MCNEAL; 11TH CIR.)



Summarized by Melissa Youngman of McCalla Raymer, LLC

The Eleventh Circuit held that a wholly unsecured junior lien on a chapter 7 debtor's home may be "stripped off" pursuant to Section 506(d) of the Bankruptcy Code.

More than 500 appellate opinions are summarized on Volo typically within 24 hours of the ruling. Click here regularly to view the latest case summaries on ABI’s Volo website.

NEW ON ABI’S BANKRUPTCY BLOG EXCHANGE: FURTHER INSIGHT ON HOW THE SUPREME COURT MAY APPROACH CREDIT BIDDING IN THE RADLAX CASE



The Bankruptcy Blog Exchange is a free ABI service that tracks 35 bankruptcy-related blogs. A blog post provides further insight on a few approaches that the Supreme Court may take on the credit-bidding issues presented in the RadLAX case.

Hear a discussion of the RadLAX post-argument featuring lead counsel David Neff by clicking here. ABI will hold a webinar on the Court’s decision as soon as it is announced in late June.

Be sure to check the site several times each day; any time a contributing blog posts a new story, a link to the story will appear on the top. If you have a blog that deals with bankruptcy, or know of a good blog that should be part of the Bankruptcy Exchange, please contact the ABI Web team.

ABI Quick Poll

The Constitutional scheme of uniform federal bankruptcy is a bad idea; the states should have more leeway to adopt their own different approaches to financial distress, at least for their own individual citizens and companies with purely intra-state operations. Click here to vote on this week's Quick Poll. Click here to view the results of previous Quick Polls.

INSOL INTERNATIONAL



INSOL International is a worldwide federation of national associations for accountants and lawyers who specialize in turnaround and insolvency. There are currently 37 member associations worldwide with more than 9,000 professionals participating as members of INSOL International. As a member association of INSOL, ABI's members receive a discounted subscription rate. See ABI's enrollment page for details.

Have a Twitter, Facebook or LinkedIn Account?

Join our networks to expand yours.

  

 

NEXT EVENT

ABI'S "Evolving Labor Issues in Chapter 11" Webinar

May 23, 2012

Register Today!


COMING UP

 

MEMPHIS 12

June 1, 2012

Register Today!

 

ABI'S "Handling the Administratively Insolvent Estate- What to Do When Your Chapter 11 Goes South?" Webinar

June 5, 2012

Register Today!

 

CS 2012

June 7-10, 2012

Fees Go Up Sunday! Register Today!

 

NE 2012

July 12-15, 2012

Register Today!

 

SE 2012

July 25-28, 2012

Register Today!

 

MA 2012

August 2-4, 2012

Early Bird Rate Expires Friday! Register Today!

 

   
  CALENDAR OF EVENTS

May

- ABI Labor and Employment Committee's "Evolving Labor Issues in Chapter 11" Webinar

     May 23, 2012



June

- Memphis Consumer Bankruptcy Conference

     June 1, 2012 | Memphis, Tenn.

- ABI'S "Handling the Administratively Insolvent Estate- What to Do When Your Chapter 11 Goes South?" Webinar

     June 5, 2012

- Central States Bankruptcy Workshop

     June 7-10, 2012 | Traverse City, Mich.

  


July

- Northeast Bankruptcy Conference and Northeast Consumer Forum

     July 12-15, 2012 | Bretton Woods, N.H.

- Southeast Bankruptcy Workshop

     July 25-28, 2012 | Amelia Island, Fla.

August

- Mid-Atlantic Bankruptcy Workshop

     August 2-4, 2012 | Cambridge, Md.

 
 

ABI BookstoreABI Endowment Fund ABI Endowment Fund
 


J.P. Morgan Reports 2 Billion Loss after Losses on Risky Trades

Submitted by webadmin on

A massive trading bet boomeranged on JPMorgan Chase & Co., leaving the bank with at least $2 billion in trading losses, the Wall Street Journal reported today. The losses stemmed from wagers gone wrong in the bank's Chief Investment Office, which manages risk for the New York company. The Wall Street Journal reported early last month that large positions taken in that office by a trader nicknamed "the London whale" had roiled a sector of the debt markets. The bank, betting on a continued economic recovery with a complex web of trades tied to the values of corporate bonds, was hit hard when prices moved against it starting last month, causing losses in many of its derivatives positions. The losses occurred while J.P. Morgan tried to scale back that trade.

FDIC to Set Plan for Bank Failures

Submitted by webadmin on

When the next crisis brings a major financial firm to its knees, U.S. regulators will seize the parent company but allow its units around the globe to keep operating while the mess is cleaned up, according to a plan to be announced today from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., the Wall Street Journal reported. The equity stakeholders of the large bank or other financial firm will be wiped out, and bondholders will face losses as their holdings are swapped for equity in a new entity, as a part of the FDIC's plan. If several federal agencies and the Treasury Department agree to seize a firm, the FDIC will unwind the parent bank holding company of the faltering firm, placing it in receivership and revoking its charter. The firm's subsidiaries around the world would continue to operate, supported with liquidity the FDIC-held parent company can borrow from the government under the Dodd-Frank financial overhaul. Next, the FDIC would transfer most of the firm's assets and some of its liabilities into what's known as a "bridge company," according to FDIC officials. There, regulators would oversee a debt-for-equity swap akin to what occurs under a chapter 11 restructuring: Equity holders would be wiped out, but creditors would get equity in exchange for the claims they held. The company eventually would emerge from the process as a new, recapitalized private entity.