Skip to main content

%1

U.S. Said to Probe 16 Financial Institutions over RMBS

Submitted by webadmin on

Sixteen financial institutions are being investigated by government officials as part of their scrutiny of bank actions in the years before the financial crisis, according to a court filing by Wall Street’s largest mortgage due-diligence firm, Bloomberg News reported today. Clayton Holdings LLC, objecting today to a July 1 subpoena seeking documents related to the firm’s work on residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS), said the U.S. Justice Department was engaged in a “fishing expedition” aimed at collecting massive amounts of data on almost 200 clients. Clayton didn’t identify the 16 institutions being probed by the RMBS working group, a group of federal and state officials that includes the Justice Department. The Justice Department’s financial fraud task force has increased its activity in RMBS cases, suing Bank of America Corp. last month as New York-based JPMorgan Chase & Co. disclosed criminal and civil investigations. Bank of America has denied wrongdoing and said it will fight the suit.

SAC Initiates Settlement Talks with the Government

Submitted by webadmin on

Lawyers for hedge fund SAC Capital Advisors last week reached out to prosecutors in New York to say that SAC founder Steven Cohen is interested in settling the civil and criminal cases against him and his company, Bloomberg News reported yesterday. The settlement of the criminal case against the firm would likely involve a substantial fine and the current number being discussed is in the neighborhood of $1 billion. One of the factors being considered in determining financial penalties is the desire to inflict monetary pain on Cohen personally without damaging other parties. After a multiyear investigation conducted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office, the FBI, and the Securities and Exchange Commission, a grand jury indicted SAC Capital on July 25, accusing the firm of fostering a culture where employees engaged in rampant securities fraud. The indictment said traders at SAC engaged in insider trading that was “substantial, pervasive, and on a scale without known precedent in the hedge fund industry.”

Commentary Is Richmond Calif.s Mortgage Seizure Scheme Even Legal

Submitted by webadmin on



ABI Bankruptcy Brief | September 24, 2013


 


  

September 24, 2013

 

home  |  newsroom  |  chart of the day  |  blogs  |  bankruptcy code and rules  |  statistics  |  legislative news  |  volo
  NEWS AND ANALYSIS   

COMMENTARY: IS RICHMOND, CALIF.'S MORTGAGE SEIZURE SCHEME EVEN LEGAL?

The possibility of using eminent domain to reduce underwater mortgage debt in the city of Richmond, Calif., survived several tough challenges a week ago, according to a Washington Post commentary on Sunday. The Richmond City Council decided to go ahead with the process after a long hearing that could have possibly derailed it. Meanwhile an attempt by Wells Fargo and Deutsche Bank to have the action shut down even before it properly started was tossed out by a U.S. district court. The arguments will now proceed to the two parts of eminent domain law: demonstrating public purpose for the takings and offering fair value. If the case succeeds, according to the commentary, it is likely that other cities that have been hesitant to adopt the tactic will consider moving forward. The biggest remaining worry, according to the commentary, is whether or not this proposal will permanently harm the ability of people in Richmond to obtain new mortgages. One of the main arguments from the banks is that the housing market is recovering at a rapid clip, and if this process scares off lenders, then it could hurt both future homeowners and the fragile economic recovery. Read more.

ANALYSIS: RETHINKING FANNIE, FREDDIE -- AND THE 30-YEAR MORTGAGE

While Congress debates how to replace Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, an additional question has surfaced as to whether all Americans should continue to have relatively easy access to the pre-payable, 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage, the Wall Street Journal reported yesterday. The 30-year mortgage provides payments that are stable for the life of the loan, which makes finances easier to manage. In many other countries, homes are financed with adjustable-rate mortgages, where payments rise and fall with prevailing interest rates. The government plays an unusually large role in the U.S. mortgage market because banks don't like holding 30-year mortgages. During the 1980s, many savings-and-loan associations failed when rates jumped because the interest they had to pay to depositors soared above the payments they received on those 30-year mortgages (known as "interest-rate risk"). While Fannie and Freddie take on the risk by buying the mortgages from lenders, package them into securities and sell those to investors, they also promise to make investors whole when mortgages default. Those who want the government out of the mortgage business say the 30-year fixed isn't all it's cracked up to be. Because borrowers pay a lot of interest during the first few years of the loan, it's hard to build equity quickly. Defenders, however, say it's the wrong time to push more people into adjustable-rate loans because interest rates are likely to increase over the coming decade. Read more. (Subscription required.)

STRUGGLING SAN JOSE TESTS A WAY TO CUT BENEFITS

San Jose, the third-largest city in California, now spends one-fifth of its $1.1 billion general fund on pensions and retiree health care, and the amount keeps rising, the New York Times reported today. To free up the money, services have been cut, libraries and community centers closed, the number of city workers trimmed, salaries reduced, and new facilities left unused for lack of staff. From potholes to home burglaries, the city's problems are growing. The situation in San Jose is not anywhere near as dire as it is in Detroit or two other California cities, Stockton and San Bernardino, which are already in bankruptcy. But government officials and municipal bankruptcy experts across the country are watching San Jose closely because of a plan to reduce benefits, which was drafted by Mayor Chuck Reed (D) and passed by 70 percent of voters in a referendum last year. The plan is being opposed in court by unions that say that it is illegal under state law. It would introduce a second tier for new city employees involving much lower pension and health benefits. It would also alter pension benefits for existing workers, allowing them to choose either a similar, second-tier benefits plan or to pay significantly more out of their own pockets for the benefits they have come to expect. Read more.

SOME SMALLER BANKS STILL OWE TARP MONEY

Five years after the financial crisis, 113 small to midsize U.S. banks still owe taxpayers about $2.7 billion, turning what was supposed to be a short-term government lifeline into a long-term source of capital, the Wall Street Journal reported today. The banks, which received funds through the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), pose a challenge for the Treasury Department, which is eager to get rid of its financial stakes but is finding many of the banks too weak to forgo government capital. Repaying the government is about to get harder, as quarterly dividend payments owed to the Treasury are set to nearly double to 9 percent. The institutions left in TARP highlight an incongruity in the banking sector: While much of the industry has returned to health, some smaller banks -- particularly those with heavy exposure to commercial real estate loans -- still are clawing their way back. Many of the banks are so weak that they have been unable to make required dividend or interest payments to the government: Seventy-nine of the remaining banks are behind, owing about $217 million to the government, according to the Treasury. Of those, 63 have missed 10 or more payments, which can be a harbinger of trouble: Anchor BanCorp Wisconsin Inc., which had a $110 million TARP infusion, missed at least 17 payments before filing for bankruptcy in August, wiping out the taxpayers' shares in the bank. California's Saigon National Bank owes roughly $1.5 million, plus an additional $390,000 in missed dividend payments. It has missed 18 of those payments, more than any other bank in the program. Read more. (Subscription required.)

ABI'S UNSECURED TRADE CREDITORS COMMITTEE INVITES YOU TO TAKE PART IN ITS OCT. 2 DISCUSSION: CONSIDERATIONS ARISING OUT OF CLAIM-TRANSFER TRANSACTIONS

Members are encouraged to join ABI's Unsecured Trade Creditors' Committee in a discussion on Oct. 2 at 4 p.m. ET about considerations that arise out of claim-transfer transactions. Bankruptcy claim transfers are an active part of the bankruptcy process in today's marketplace, and for this reason, the Judicial Conference of the United States imposed a new fee on each transfer, effective May 1, 2013. The moderator for the call, Neil B. Glassman of Bayard, P.A. (Wilmington, Del.), will lead a discussion focusing on the steps in a claim-sale transaction, standard provisions in the transaction documents, developments in the industry, and tricks and traps creditors' counsel can avoid. If you would like to participate on the committee call, please contact Martha Cannon at mcannon@abiworld.org.

ABILIVE WEBINAR NEXT WEEK LOOKS AT THE INTERSECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND BANKRUPTCY: KODAK, NORTEL AND OTHER CASES

IP experts will shed light on the mysteries of understanding IP law and navigating the often puzzling sales processes, drawing from their experiences in Nortel, Kodak and other important cases, in an abiLIVE webinar on Oct. 3 from 1:00-2:15 p.m. ET. Speakers will include David Berten (Global IP Law Group, LLC; Chicago), Pauline K. Morgan (Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP; Wilmington, Del.), Cassandra M. Porter (Lowenstein Sandler LLP; Roseland, N.J.), Kelly Beaudin Stapleton (Alvarez & Marsal; New York) and Christopher Burton Wick (Hahn Loeser & Parks LLP; Cleveland). To register, click here.


FIRST ABI WORKSHOP PROGRAM LOOKS AT RISKY TIMES FOR SECURED LENDERS AND SERVICERS! ATTEND IN PERSON OR VIA LIVE WEBSTREAM

You will not want to miss the abiWorkshops series' inaugural program, "Risky Times for Secured Lenders and Servicers." The program is cosponsored by TMA (Chesapeake), IWIRC (D.C./Greater Maryland) and RMA (Potomac), and will be held on Nov. 6 from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. ET in the ABI Headquarters Conference Center in Alexandria, Va. The abiWorkshops series provides attendees two great ways of participating: You can register to attend in person at the ABI Conference Center, or you can participate via a live webstream! Topics that will be covered on the Nov. 6 program include:



- Living with the New CFPB Mortgage Servicing Rules

-
Business Lending: Navigating What Lies Ahead

- Business Lending: Recent Legal Developments



For more information or to register for the "Risky Times for Secured Lenders and Servicers" abiWorkshop on Nov. 6, please click here.

RECORDING AVAILABLE OF THE ABILIVE WEBINAR EXAMINING THE NEW U.S. TRUSTEE FEE GUIDELINES!

If you were not able to join ABI's recent well-attended abiLIVE webinar examining the U.S. Trustee Fee Guidelines for chapter 11 cases filed on or after Nov. 1, a recording of the program is now available for downloading! A panel of experts, including Clifford J. White, the director of the U.S. Trustee Program, discussed some of the ways the new guidelines could change day-to-day operations in firms, issues relating to the new market rate benchmarks, and how these changes might alter insolvency practice. The 90-minute recording is available for the special ABI member price of $75 and can be purchased here.

ABI GOLF TOUR UNDERWAY; LAST STOP FOR 2013 IS WINTER LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE IN DECEMBER

The 7th and final stop for the 2013 ABI Golf Tour is on Dec. 5 at the Trump National Golf Club, held in conjunction with ABI’s Winter Leadership Conference. Final scoring to win the Great American Cup — sponsored by Great American Group — is based on your top three scores from the seven ABI events. See the Tour page for details and course descriptions. The ABI Golf Tour combines networking with fun competition, as golfers "play their own ball." Including your handicap means everyone has an equal chance to compete for the glory of being crowned ABI's top golfer of 2013! A 22-handicapper won the tour event at July’s Southeast Bankruptcy Workshop. There's no charge to register or participate in the Tour.

ABI IN-DEPTH

NEW CASE SUMMARY ON VOLO: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. V. ARMSTRONG (IN RE ARMSTRONG; 8TH CIR.)

Summarized by Bruce Weiner of Rosenberg, Musso & Weiner

The Eighth Circuit BAP affirmed the bankruptcy court's ruling that the debt owed by the debtor to Bank of America was nondischargeable under § 523(a)(4). The debtor received insurance checks payable to his business and the mortgage-holder on the property owned by the business. The debtor used almost all the money for personal expenses instead of repairs or paying it to the mortgage-holder. Bank of America succeeded the rights of the mortgage-holder. Because the mortgage-holder was a loss payee on the policy, it was the owner of the insurance proceeds, and therefore when the debtor failed to remit the funds or even inform the mortgage-holder about the funds, he knowingly took funds that he knew belonged to the mortgage-holder. The debtor was not lawfully entitled to use the funds, and therefore the obligation of the debtor to Bank of America was nondischargeable under § 523(a)(4).

There are more than 1,000 appellate opinions summarized on Volo, and summaries typically appear within 24 hours of the ruling. Click here regularly to view the latest case summaries on ABI’s Volo website.

NEW ON ABI’S BANKRUPTCY BLOG EXCHANGE: BANKRUPTCY COURT DECIDES IRS FORM 1099-C CONSTITUTES ADMISSION THAT BANK CANCELLED CLAIM

The Bankruptcy Blog Exchange is a free ABI service that tracks more than 80 bankruptcy-related blogs. A recent blog post examines a decision from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee that highlights the interplay between bankruptcy and tax issues. In In re Reed, Judge Richard Stair, Jr. held that an Internal Revenue Service "Cancellation of Debt" Form 1099-C delivered by a bank to a debtor, who as a result of which reported cancellation-of-debt income, constituted an admission by the bank that its claim had been cancelled. The court emphasized that the issuance of Form 1099-C itself did not discharge the debt. Rather, the issuance of the form "reflects" the discharge or cancellation of the debt.

Be sure to check the site several times each day; any time a contributing blog posts a new story, a link to the story will appear on the top. If you have a blog that deals with bankruptcy, or know of a good blog that should be part of the Bankruptcy Exchange, please contact the ABI Web team.

ABI Quick Poll

Success fees for financial advisors should be prohibited.

Click here to vote on this week's Quick Poll. Click here to view the results of previous Quick Polls.

INSOL INTERNATIONAL



INSOL International is a worldwide federation of national associations for accountants and lawyers who specialize in turnaround and insolvency. There are currently 43 member associations worldwide with more than 9,000 professionals participating as members of INSOL International. As a member association of INSOL, ABI's members receive a discounted subscription rate. See ABI's enrollment page for details.

Have a Twitter, Facebook or LinkedIn Account?

Join our networks to expand yours.

  

 

FRIDAY:

 

 

VFB2013

Register Today!

 

 

COMING UP

 

 

MW2013

Register Today!

 

 

 

MW2013

Register Today!

 

 

 

Mid-Level PDP 2013

Register Today!

 

 

 

Detroit

Register Today!

 

 

 

Detroit

Register Today!

 

 

 

CFRP13

Register Today!

 

 

 

CFRP13

Register Today!

 

 

 

CRC13

Register Today!

 

 

 

ACBPIA13

Register Today!

 

 

 

Detroit

Register Today!

 

 

 

Delaware

Register Today!

 

 

 

WLC

Register Today!

 

 

 

40-Hour Mediation Program

Register Today!

 

   
  CALENDAR OF EVENTS
 

2013

September

- Bankruptcy 2013: Views from the Bench

    Sept. 27, 2013 | Washington, D.C.

October

- abiLIVE Webinar: The Intersection of Intellectual Property and Bankruptcy: Kodak, Nortel and Other Cases

     Oct. 3, 2013

- Midwestern Bankruptcy Institute Program and Midwestern Consumer Forum

    Oct. 4, 2013 | Kansas City, Mo.

- Professional Development Program

    Oct. 11, 2013 | New York, N.Y.

- Chicago Consumer Bankruptcy Conference

    Oct. 14, 2013 | Chicago, Ill.

- International Insolvency & Restructuring Symposium

    Oct. 25, 2013 | Berlin, Germany

November

- abiWorkshop: "Risky Times for Secured Lenders and Servicers"

   Nov. 6, 2013 | Alexandria, Va.

  




- Complex Financial Restructuring Program

   Nov. 7, 2013 | Philadelphia, Pa.

- Corporate Restructuring Competition

   Nov. 7-8, 2013 | Philadelphia, Pa.

- Austin Advanced Consumer Bankruptcy Practice Institute

   Nov. 10-12, 2013 | Austin, Texas

- Detroit Consumer Bankruptcy Conference

   Nov. 11, 2013 | Detroit, Mich.

- Delaware Views from the Bench

   Nov. 25, 2013 | Wilmington, Del.

December

- Winter Leadership Conference

    Dec. 5-7, 2013 | Rancho Palos Verdes, Calif.

- ABI/St. John’s Bankruptcy Mediation Training

    Dec. 8-12, 2013 | New York


 
 

ABI BookstoreABI Endowment Fund ABI Endowment Fund
 


Brookfield AIG Agree to End Suit Tied to 2008 Collapse

Submitted by webadmin on

American International Group Inc. and Brookfield Asset Management Inc. agreed to end a 2009 lawsuit in which Brookfield sought a judge’s ruling that the insurer’s collapse triggered default provisions in interest-rate swaps, Bloomberg News reported yesterday. Brookfield sued in federal court in Manhattan, alleging that New York-based AIG and its Financial Products unit “refused to concede the occurrence” of a default even though AIG got a $182.3 billion bailout package from the U.S. government. Brookfield, based in Toronto, and its Brysons International Ltd. unit, which joined in the suit as a plaintiff, sought a declaration from a federal judge that the insurer’s collapse triggered default provisions in two interest-rate swaps. AIG had said that Brookfield, based in Toronto, had attempted to evade a $1.5 billion debt.

JPMorgan Said to Face U.S. Mortgage Securities Charges

Submitted by webadmin on

Charges related to JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s sales of mortgage-backed securities could be filed as early as today by U.S. prosecutors in California who have been investigating the bank, Bloomberg News reported today. The bank said last month in a regulatory filing that the U.S. Attorney’s office in Sacramento had parallel civil and criminal investigations under way. Investigators already have concluded that it broke civil laws and were examining whether criminal laws were broken, according to the filing. JPMorgan last week admitted to violating federal securities laws and agreed to pay about $920 million in connection with more than $6.2 billion in trading losses at its London offices. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission said senior managers at the bank knew in April 2012 that the bank’s chief investment office in London was using aggressive valuations that hid losses. The probe of the New York-based bank’s securities sales stems from the work of an Obama administration task force set up to investigate causes of the financial crisis. The group includes U.S. Attorney Ben Wagner in Sacramento and New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman.

JPMorgan Fined 389 Million for Deceptive Credit Card Practices

Submitted by webadmin on

Federal regulators yesterday slapped JPMorgan Chase with $389 million in penalties for deceiving millions of customers into buying costly and unneeded services when they signed up for credit cards, the Washington Post reported today. The nation’s largest bank will pay $309 million to reimburse about 2.1 million consumers who were duped into paying for credit monitoring and other add-ons between October 2005 and June 2012. Those consumers enrolled in and paid for identity theft protection products but did not receive the full benefit of the products, according to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. The bank regulator hit JPMorgan with an additional $60 million civil penalty based, in part, on the scope and duration of the violations. The OCC also is requiring the bank to take a number of corrective measures, including developing a better risk-management program for consumer products marketed or sold by JPMorgan or its vendors.

JPMorgan Said to Pay 900 Million to Settle London Whale Probes

Submitted by webadmin on

JPMorgan Chase & Co. is poised to pay about $900 million to settle U.S. and U.K. claims that lax internal controls led the bank to provide inaccurate information about last year’s record trading loss to the board, investors and regulators, Bloomberg News reported yesterday. The bank announced deals yesterday with four regulators over its handling of the trades by an employee known as the "London Whale" because his bets were so large. Separately, the firm may also pay less than $80 million to settle two watchdogs’ probes tied to consumer lending practices.

Ex-JPMorgan Employees Indicted over 6.2 Billion Loss

Submitted by webadmin on

Two former JPMorgan Chase & Co. traders were indicted for engaging in a securities fraud to hide trading losses that eventually surpassed $6.2 billion on wrong-way derivatives bets last year, Bloomberg News reported yesterday. Javier Martin-Artajo, who oversaw trading strategy for the synthetic portfolio at the bank’s chief investment office in London, and Julien Grout, a trader who worked for him, were named in the indictment, unsealed yesterday in federal court in Manhattan. The U.S. announced preliminary charges against the men in August. Both were indicted by a grand jury on five counts, including securities fraud, conspiracy, filing false books and records, wire fraud and making false filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The pair, along with unidentified co-conspirators, are accused of engaging in a scheme to manipulate and inflate the value of position markings in the synthetic credit portfolio, or SCP. They face prison terms of up to 20 years if convicted of securities fraud, the most serious charge.

DRW Investments Sues to Forestall CFTC Enforcement Action

Submitted by webadmin on

DRW Investments LLC, a Chicago-based investment firm, filed a preemptive lawsuit against the Commodity Futures Trading Commission seeking a court’s finding that the company didn’t breach derivatives trading regulations, Bloomberg News reported yesterday. DRW Investments and its principal, Donald R. Wilson, sued the CFTC yesterday saying that its case is a response to the agency’s “stated intention to bring an enforcement action.” At issue are interest-rate swap futures contracts traded on the Nasdaq OMX Futures Exchange and cleared through the International Derivatives Clearinghouse from August 2010 through September 2011. Wilson and the company, a unit of DRW Holdings LLC, alleged that when the trades were carried out, no regulation or rule made them illegal and any attempt by the agency to make them so now would violate their constitutional right to fair notice of what activities would be considered market manipulation.

Banks Face Fines for Benchmark Safeguard Breaches in EU Plan

Submitted by webadmin on

Banks risk fines as high as 10 percent of their yearly sales for failing to set up adequate safeguards to combat benchmark rigging, under European Union anti-manipulation rules presented today, Bloomberg News reported. Michel Barnier, the EU’s financial services chief, is also seeking to empower regulators so that they can force banks to take part in some benchmark-setting panels, in proposals targeting scandals that began with the London interbank offered rate (Libor) and spread across the financial system. Benchmarks from oil to foreign exchange are being probed by global regulators as they seek to restore trust in rates undermined by evidence of endemic rigging. Authorities have fined UBS AG, Barclays Plc and Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc about $2.5 billion for distorting Libor and other interbank rates. Other firms are under investigation around the world.