%1
Judgment Void for Violating Discharge Doesn’t Qualify for Rooker-Feldman Protection
Circuits Split on Enjoining the IRS from Pursuing Corporate Officer to Collect Taxes
Retention of Jurisdiction by Itself Does Not Confer Subject Matter Jurisdiction, Circuit Holds
Commentary: Supreme Court Issues Another Blow to Forum Shopping for Plaintiffs Bar
The Supreme Court made clear that forum shopping has limits and the plaintiffs bar has gone too far, according to a Wall Street Journal reported yesterday. The Justices ruled 8-1 that out of state plaintiffs could not sue in Montana when the railroad company in question, BNSF, wasn’t incorporated there, the plaintiffs didn’t live there and the injuries didn’t occur there. That BNSF does business in Montana wasn’t adequate grounds for the company to be sued there. (BNSF v. Tyrell). “Our precedent,” Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote for the majority, “explains that the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause does not permit a State to hale an out-of-state corporation before its courts when the corporation is not ‘at home’ in the State and the episode-in-suit occurred elsewhere.” The ruling overturned the Montana Supreme Court.