Finality depends on the final resolution of a dispute, not an issue within a dispute, Circuit Judge Easterbrook says.
Sixth Circuit revives lawsuit against lender that allegedly aided Ponzi scheme.
Unusual facts permit no exception to rigid rules on appellate jurisdiction.
Evidence Rule 701 requires the homeowner’s opinion on value, not someone else’s.
Showing intentional violation of court order isn’t enough for nondischargeability.
A ‘profound impact’ on an estate does not by itself result in a ‘core’ claim.
Try garnishment, not contempt, to collect support from a chapter 13 debtor.
‘Related to’ jurisdiction arises only if unsecured creditors are affected, judge holds.