Analysis: CFPB Faces 'Rock and a Hard Place' in Pushing Arbitration Rule
The question hanging over the CFPB’s arbitration rule — a proposal that drew tens of thousands of comments from consumer and business advocates — is less now about the finer points of the final rule than about whether the regulations will ever see the light of day at all, according to a National Law Journal analysis. President Donald Trump and Republican lawmakers are erasing a host of Obama-era rules through the Congressional Review Act — a statutory tool that, before the Trump administration, had only been used once in its 21-year history to roll back a regulation. The law gives Congress a window of 60 legislative days — after an agency has transmitted a new rule to Capitol Hill — to enact a disapproval resolution. If the rule is voided by the Congressional Review Act, the CFPB would be prevented from enacting a “substantially similar” regulation unless it is supported by a new statute. Such a setback would indefinitely handcuff the agency, stymieing its ability to limit forced-arbitration agreements — often found in the fine print of consumer contracts — that the bureau has described as “contract gotchas.”
