A noncompetition agreement that would preclude finding other sources of revenue can be the basis for showing irreparable harm and entitlement to a preliminary injunction.
Litigation in bankruptcy can be highly contentious, and attorneys often believe that the normal rules in federal district court governing depositions do not apply to a Rule 2004 examination of a debtor. But do those attorneys have it wrong in an adversary proceeding or contested matter? Rule 2004 exams are not always as broad as interested parties hope.
If It Ain’t Broke, Should the Court “Fix” It? Payment Periods in Nonconsensual Sub V Plans
