The majority on a Third Circuit panel decided that a confirmation order many years earlier prevented one nondebtor from suing another nondebtor on an issue that wouldn’t affect the debtor’s estate but did entail interpreting the confirmation order.
Reversing its prior decision after rehearing, the Third Circuit allowed a bankruptcy judge to interpret a confirmation decision made 12 years before by a district judge.
The concurring opinion in Bestwall could be read to suggest that Circuit Judge G. Steven Agee might have an open mind if a confirmed plan comes to the Fourth Circuit on appeal.
The Bestwall dissenter understands the Bankruptcy Clause as having the 18th century definition of ‘bankruptcy,’ thus requiring insolvency or inability to pay debts.
Fourth Circuit majority and dissenting opinions might be read to suggest that Bestwall could have tough sledding on an appeal from confirmation since the debtor is solvent.