Skip to main content

%1

Chief Justice Roberts Appoints New York Judge to Oversee Puerto Rico Bankruptcy

Submitted by ckanon@abi.org on
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts has appointed a New York judge with experience overseeing bankruptcy and financial crime cases to preside over the bankruptcy of Puerto Rico, USA Today reported on Friday. Roberts named U.S. District Court Judge Laura Taylor Swain of the Southern District of New York to lead a case involving prodigious complexity and scope, not to mention profound implications for millions of American citizens, creditors and pensioners. The appointment of Swain to oversee Puerto Rico's debt-cutting case may alleviate concerns among some legal observers that the case could fall into the hands of a federal judge without bankruptcy expertise. Justice Roberts was required by law to appoint a district court judge, not a bankruptcy judge as is typical in municipal cases. Swain was a bankruptcy judge in the Eastern District of New York from 1996 through 2000 until then-President Bill Clinton appointed her to her current role in the district court. She has played a key role in revising federal bankruptcy procedures, which will be critical to Puerto Rico's case, having earned a reputation for thoroughness and fair treatment in her past cases. "Judge Swain is an excellent choice," said Melissa Jacoby, a University of North Carolina law professor who has studied municipal bankruptcy and the Puerto Rico case, and a former ABI Resident Scholar. "She is a judge and person of unimpeachable integrity. Stakeholders of all kinds should be confident that the process will be fair."

Editorial: Puerto Rico’s Only Hope: The Bankruptcy Process Will Be Painful, but It’s Necessary

Submitted by ckanon@abi.org on
Puerto Rico, deep in a fiscal hole it dug partially with its own shovels, is about to grab a rope and start pulling itself out, according to an editorial in today’s New York Daily News. All who care about the island Commonwealth, including the 3.5 million people who live there and 800,000 New Yorkers of Puerto Rican descent, should suck up the inevitable pain and hope to high heaven that this works. The day of reckoning is here for many reasons, but foremost because, over decades, Puerto Rico’s government spent way more than it took in. While American states have to balance their budgets, a task they often fudge through fiscal trickery, Puerto Rico didn’t even have that fig leaf. So the government issued more and more debt to fund its operations, up to $70 billion by 2014, and now north of $100 billion. Add to that more than $40 billion in unfunded pension liabilities. But Washington more than contributed to the calamity. In 1984, Congress shamefully and inexplicably stripped Puerto Rico of the ability to seek bankruptcy, a right open to all 50 states and every political subdivision therein. More than 30 years too late, Congress finally wised up last summer and gave Puerto Rico the bankruptcy option. As the plan begins to bite, there will no doubt be major dislocations, from public sector layoffs to reduced pensions to big losses for investors, as the island’s debt exceeding $100 billion is restructured. It’s not going to be fun. But pray that all who love this great place stay on board long enough to let its people crawl out of the hole and start walking.
 
For more news and analysis of Puerto Rico's debt crisis, be sure to visit ABI's "Puerto Rico in Distress" webpage.

 

Nobody Wins if Hartford Goes Bankrupt

Submitted by ckanon@abi.org on
For Hartford, Conn., the threat of bankruptcy is real. Other cities have structural deficits but Hartford also faces an immediate cash flow crisis, the Hartford Courant reported yesterday. Structural deficits can be solved over time. Cash flow crises require immediate action so that the city can pay its bills. Earlier this year, the National Resource Network was brought on to help Hartford identify options to achieve fiscal sustainability. As the General Assembly considers proposals to aid Hartford and the city council debates budget for the fiscal year starting July 1, there are some preliminary findings. Bankruptcy or continued decline in city services would have a negative effect statewide. If Hartford went bankrupt, made draconian service cuts or adopted higher tax rates, local employers would have to consider whether they want to bear additional cost or risk — or leave. Bankruptcy would cause the city to spend millions in legal and other fees. It would limit the city's ability to borrow and make the long term investments needed to grow the economy. Hartford can avoid bankruptcy, but all stakeholders will need to address challenges head-on. There is no low hanging fruit left for the city to reduce cost or increase revenue — certainly not enough to close the projected gap in the next fiscal year's budget, let alone future projected deficits. Under the current rules, Hartford cannot win. That's why any solution will require a change to the rules.
 
Get a better understanding of municipal bankruptcy and chapter 9 with Municipalities in Peril: The ABI Guide to Chapter 9, 2nd Edition.

 

Article Tags

Puerto Rico's Fate Hangs on Chief Justice Roberts

Submitted by ckanon@abi.org on
A little-noticed provision in a bill signed into law in 2016 places the fate of Puerto Rico in the hands of Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, USA Today reported yesterday. PROMESA gives Chief Justice Roberts the power to appoint a U.S. district court judge to oversee the bankruptcy-like case involving a U.S. territory. That was a "jarring break" from traditional municipal bankruptcies, which are overseen by bankruptcy judges, said Melissa Jacoby, a University of North Carolina law professor. One significant difference is that district court judges, unlike bankruptcy judges, are political appointees. As other municipal bankruptcies have demonstrated, the judge in control of the case retains significant sway over the outcome. Chief Justice Roberts' views on municipal debt issues are unclear but in a case that came before the court and decided last June, he joined a 5-2 decision that rejected Puerto Rico's attempt to establish its own legal procedure akin to municipal bankruptcy. The fierce legal battle that's about to ensue will involve a fight over which creditors deserve to be paid the most. This may ultimately require the judge in control of the case to make tough decisions, distinguish between creditors, referee disputes with little legal precedent and possibly decide whether retirees will endure cuts to their pensions and health care.
 
For more news and analysis of Puerto Rico's debt crisis, be sure to visit ABI's "Puerto Rico in Distress" webpage.
 

 

Puerto Rico Starts $70B Bankruptcy Proceeding, Biggest Ever for Municipal Bond Market

Submitted by ckanon@abi.org on
Puerto Rico has officially requested to enter into a bankruptcy-like proceeding to restructure its massive debt load after talks with its creditors failed, CNBC reported yesterday. Puerto Rico's governor, Ricardo Rosselló, announced Wednesday that he had requested that the federally appointed oversight board trigger title III of the PROMESA Act, a court-supervised debt restructuring similar to bankruptcy, in order to guarantee the best interests of the Puerto Rican people. The restructuring of Puerto Rico's roughly $70 billion in outstanding debt would be the largest in the history of the U.S. municipal bond market and will set the stage for a lengthy legal battle between the island and its creditors, which include multiple hedge funds and mutual funds, as they face off in court, where a federally appointed judge could force creditors to accept unfavorable repayment terms. Following the Title III announcement, the Ad Hoc Group of General Obligation bondholders, which holds approximately $3 billion of the island's debt, issued a strongly worded statement accusing the oversight board of sabotaging creditor talks in order to push Puerto Rico into bankruptcy. "A Title III filing at this point in time enables Puerto Rico to freeze numerous lawsuits, maintain essential services for its residents, and rely on a court-driven restructuring process to objectively determine respective creditors' rights," said Susheel Kirpalani of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan. "While it is regrettable that Puerto Rico is facing a bankruptcy-like process to resolve its historic fiscal challenges, this was certainly an option of last resort."
 
Click here to read Puerto Rico Governor Ricardo Rosselló’s letter to the Financial Oversight and Management Board.
 
For more news and analysis of Puerto Rico's debt crisis, be sure to visit ABI's "Puerto Rico in Distress" webpage.

Analysis: Puerto Rico Bondholders Are In for a Bumpy Bankruptcy Ride

Submitted by ckanon@abi.org on
ABI BANKRUPTCY BRIEF
CLICK HERE TO VIEW ONLINE VERSION.

May 4, 2017

 
%%first_name%% %%last_name%%
Update profile
%%dynamic_content_227%%
ABI Bankruptcy Brief
 
 
 
 
NEWS AND ANALYSIS

Analysis: Puerto Rico Bondholders Are In for a Bumpy Bankruptcy Ride

If Puerto Rico’s record-setting bankruptcy follows the template of other municipal restructurings, general obligation bondholders may be in for a long ride, despite constitutional guarantees on their debt, according to an analysis in Reuters today. The federal financial oversight board for Puerto Rico yesterday pushed the U.S. commonwealth into a court-sanctioned restructuring process (Title III), and similar filings for the island’s public agencies could be coming soon. The island's constitution guarantees the debt of GO, or general obligation, bondholders, while other debt, known as COFINA, is backed by revenue streams from tax proceeds. But in past bankruptcies, that has not meant much. In five of six recent public bankruptcies in which the debtor defaulted on bonds, pensioners walked away with full recovery while bondholders took haircuts, according to data from Moody’s Investors Service. “If the market hasn’t taken this dynamic into account by now, you can imagine they will after Puerto Rico, given its enormous scale,” said bankruptcy expert and ABI Resident Scholar Drew Dawson, a professor at the University of Miami School of Law. Moody’s has rated the commonwealth's GO and COFINA debt on equal footing, forecasting recoveries for both of between 65 and 80 cents on the dollar, and ahead of debt from Puerto Rican agencies like the Government Development Bank, which it sees as recovering less than 35 cents. Susheel Kirpalani, a lawyer for a COFINA investor group, on Wednesday called the filing “sound public policy.” All along, COFINA holders have favored the bankruptcy route. But Andrew Rosenberg, a lawyer for a GO bond group, said “the economy of Puerto Rico will be put on hold for years” in a bankruptcy.
read more

Op-Ed: Puerto Rican Bankruptcy: Better Late than Never

Wednesday's application by Puerto Rican Governor Ricardo Rosselló for bankruptcy protection for the island under the provisions of the PROMESA Act underlines the dictum that if a debt cannot be repaid, it will not be repaid, according to an op-ed in The Hill today. One must now hope that wise use will be made of the forthcoming bankruptcy process not only to ensure that a fair deal is secured for both Puerto Rico and its creditors, but also to put the Puerto Rican economy back on an economic growth path that might restore prosperity to the island. It was always fanciful to think that Puerto Rico could either repay or engineer a voluntary restructuring of its public-debt mountain, according to the op-ed, but the island has no fewer than 18 separate bond issues, each of which has different legal protections or claims to different streams of government revenues. In light of the island’s highly compromised public finances, one should not have been surprised by Wednesday’s request by Governor Rosselló for bankruptcy protection. After all, the island was being hit by a slew of damaging creditor lawsuits in the immediate wake of the May 1 expiry of the temporary stay against such litigation. Rather, one should have been surprised that the governor waited until after the lawsuits had been filed before he sought such protection, given how inevitable bankruptcy for the island seemed to be. One must welcome Governor Rosselló’s decision now to seek bankruptcy protection, according to the op-ed. This should provide the framework for an orderly and fair restructuring of the island’s debt without rancorous and economically damaging creditor lawsuits. The orderly restructuring of Puerto Rico’s debt should also be seen as a necessary, but far from sufficient, condition for its economic revival.
read more

House Panel Approves Plan to Undo Parts of Dodd-Frank Financial Law

The House Financial Services Committee voted 34-26 along party lines today to approve the first comprehensive congressional plan to undo Obama-era financial regulations, the Wall Street Journal reported today. The committee sent the Financial Choice Act, a bill by the panel’s chairman that unwinds significant parts of the 2010 Dodd-Frank law approved after the financial crisis, to the full House, where it will likely get a vote in the coming weeks. The legislation eases regulations and some capital requirements for healthy firms, forces failing firms to go through bankruptcy and restructures the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. “Our plan replaces Dodd-Frank’s growth-strangling regulations on small banks and credit unions with reforms that expand access to capital so small businesses on Main Street can grow and create jobs,” said House Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas). Democrats relentlessly fought to stop the bill’s first passage over three days of committee debate by proposing nearly two dozen amendments, many of which would have preserved components of the law Republicans want to eliminate. All of the Democratic amendments were rejected. But some of the issues, such as narrowing the CFPB’s powers and the process for unwinding a failed financial firm, will come up again as debate over changing Dodd-Frank moves through Congress.
read more

Interest Rates Remain Unchanged; Fed Notes Softness in Economy

The Federal Reserve’s Open Market Committee’s decision about raising interest rates was a no go, Forbes reported Wednesday. That likely doesn’t surprise market-watchers who have been following the CME’s FedWatch Tool, which has been predicting with a 95 percent probability for some time now that Wednesday’s Fed decision would be a nondecision. Could there be a step-up by June? Hard to say, based on the Central Bank’s statement. Sticking with the “gradual pace” of tightening that Fed Chair Janet Yellen has advocated for some time, the Fed statement noted softness in the economy and a slowdown in household spending, but signaled a stay-the-course position on monetary policy. “The committee views the slowing in growth during the first quarter as likely to be transitory and continues to expect that, with gradual adjustments in the stance of monetary policy, economic activity will expand at a moderate pace, labor market conditions will strengthen somewhat further, and inflation will stabilize around 2 percent over the medium term,” according to the Central Bank’s statement. The statement failed to give any clear hints about when the Fed might raise interest rates next, noting that it believes that “economic conditions will evolve in a manner that will warrant gradual increases in the federal funds rate” and adding that “the federal funds rate is likely to remain, for some time, below levels that are expected to prevail in the longer run.”
read more

Sign up Today to Receive Rochelle’s Daily Wire by E-mail!
Have you signed up for Rochelle’s Daily Wire in the ABI Newsroom? Receive Bill Rochelle’s exclusive perspectives and analyses of important case decisions via e-mail!

Tap into Rochelle’s Daily Wire via the ABI Newsroom and Twitter!

PRESIDENTIAL PARTNERS
Bloomberg Law  Gavin / SolmoneseThomson-ReutersThompson-Reuters
UPCOMING EVENTS
7th Annual Steven M. Yoder Memorial Golf Tournament May 15, 2017 Avondale, Pa.
Litigation Skills Symposium May 17-20, 2017 Coronado, Calif.
New York City Bankruptcy Conference May 18, 2017 New York, N.Y.
Central States Bankruptcy Workshop June 8-10, 2017 Acme, Mich.
Northeast Conference & Consumer Forum July 20-23, 2017 Newport, R.I.
Southeast Bankruptcy Workshop July 27-30, 2017 Hilton Head, S.C.
Mid-Atlantic Bankruptcy Workshop August 3-5, 2017 Hershey, Pa.
Click here for Full calendar

BLOG EXCHANGE

New on ABI’s Bankruptcy Blog Exchange: How Ending the FDIC's Resolution Powers Would Hurt Americans

The full-scale attack on the “orderly liquidation authority,” the Dodd-Frank Act provision authorizing the government to manage wind-downs of failed companies, is unfortunate, according to a recent blog post.

To read more on this blog and all others on the ABI Blog Exchange, please click here.

 
© 2017 AMERICAN BANKRUPTCY INSTITUTE
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
66 CANAL CENTER PLAZA, SUITE 600,
ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314

TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM FUTURE BANKRUPTCY BRIEF EMAILS,
CLICK HERE.

 

 

Puerto Rico Teeters on Brink of Historic Bankruptcy as Lawsuits Mount

Submitted by ckanon@abi.org on
The cash-strapped island of Puerto Rico was hit with several lawsuits yesterday just hours after a stay on litigation expired as the commonwealth failed to reach a restructuring agreement with its bondholders on its massive debt load, CNBC reported yesterday. In a suit filed by Ambac, one of the largest insurers of debt issued by Puerto Rico, the company argued that "the Commonwealth, egged on by the Oversight Board, continues to flagrantly disregard the rule of law" and said the company is seeking a declaratory judgment that the commonwealth's fiscal plan is unconstitutional and illegal. Ambac is also seeking to block Puerto Rico from officially launching Title III, a court-supervised bankruptcy-like restructuring process. The restructuring of Puerto Rico's roughly $70 billion in outstanding debt would be the largest in the history of the U.S. municipal bond market. The lawsuits filed yesterday could be the tipping point for the government of Puerto Rico and its seven-member oversight board — which was also put in place by PROMESA and tasked with overseeing the daunting challenge of restructuring the island's debt — to officially push the island into a Title III proceeding, which could force creditors to accept unfavorable repayment terms. However, in a statement released late Monday evening, Puerto Rico's fiscal agency signaled that despite the stay expiring, it wasn't going to rush into Title III.
 
For more news and analysis of Puerto Rico's debt crisis, be sure to visit ABI's "Puerto Rico in Distress" webpage.

Anticipating Bankruptcy, Puerto Rico’s Creditors Make Eleventh-Hour Maneuvers

Submitted by ckanon@abi.org on
With Puerto Rico on the brink of entering an unprecedented bankruptcy, Wall Street firms with billions of dollars on the line are losing hope of keeping restructuring talks out of the courtroom, the Wall Street Journal reported yesterday. Creditor groups were negotiating this week to reach standstill agreements designed to prolong private negotiations and forestall the need for a court-supervised restructuring proceeding. But major creditors hadn’t signed forbearance agreements as of Monday evening, hours before the expiration of a key deadline, heightening the likelihood that federal oversight officials will see no choice but to place the struggling U.S. territory under bankruptcy protection. Starting today, a legal shield protecting Puerto Rico from debt-related lawsuits vanishes, exposing the territory and Gov. Ricardo Rosselló to rulings that could favor one creditor group over another. The federal board overseeing its restructuring could also invoke a quasi-bankruptcy proceeding to keep the legal stay in place. Negotiations between the board, the territory and its creditors have revolved around a fiscal plan that allocates roughly $800 million a year, less than a quarter of what is owed, to creditors over the next decade. But creditors — mainly hedge funds, mutual funds and bond insurers — have criticized the fiscal plan, saying that it fails to comply with directives issued by Congress when lawmakers installed the oversight board and erected a binding legal framework for the adjustment of Puerto Rico’s debts.
 
For more news and analysis of Puerto Rico's debt crisis, be sure to visit ABI's "Puerto Rico in Distress" webpage.

 

Puerto Rico Takes One Step Closer to Bankruptcy

Submitted by ckanon@abi.org on
A federal stay barring Puerto Rico’s creditors from taking legal action against the commonwealth and most of its entities for nonpayment of debt expires on Tuesday, the Wall Street Journal reported yesterday. The stay was ordered under the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management and Economic Stability Act, or PROMESA, passed by Congress in June 2016. It was designed to give cash-strapped Puerto Rico time to come up with a viable long-term fiscal plan, and to work with creditors toward a voluntary debt restructuring, but both sides appear to be far apart. The expiration of the stay could allow Puerto Rico’s newly elected Gov. Ricardo Rosselló to seek bankruptcy protection for much of that debt, as provided for under PROMESA, but creditors won’t go down without a fight.
 
For more news and analysis of Puerto Rico's debt crisis, be sure to visit ABI's "Puerto Rico in Distress" webpage.

How Wall Street ‘Innovations’ Cost Taxpayers Millions

Submitted by ckanon@abi.org on
The City of Chicago, Jefferson County, Ala., Riverside, Calif., and a school district north of San Diego have lost millions of dollars by using creative municipal finance, and if citizens around the country aren’t vigilant and outspoken, their city, county or school district may become the next victim of an unnecessarily complex bond deal, The Fiscal Times reported today. Perhaps the worst victim of municipal financial “innovation” was Jefferson County which filed for bankruptcy after its interest rate swaps blew up. After suffering a series of rating downgrades, the City of Chicago paid $270 million to close out swaps and convert its variable rate debt to fixed. Why bother with such complicated deals in the first place? Bankers who promoted interest rate swaps argued that municipal issuers would have lower interest costs overall by borrowing at variable rates. But fees banks collected for arranging the swaps offset these savings. Also, because bankers are more knowledgeable about swaps than politicians and government finance staffers, the terms and conditions of these deals often protected banks at the expense of borrowers.