Skip to main content

%1

U.S. Homeownership Rate Hits Highest Level in 12 Years — But It Could Be a Fluke

Submitted by ckanon@abi.org on
The U.S. homeownership rate hit the highest level in almost 12 years in the second quarter during the height of the coronavirus pandemic, but the gain could be a data collection fluke, Yahoo Finance reported. The rate grew to 67.9% in the second quarter, the highest since the third quarter of 2008 and up from 65.3% in the first quarter, according to the Census Bureau. The 2.7-percentage-point jump was also the largest on record. But the bureau said the rate could have been affected by the data-collection methods in the second quarter, which relied on only telephone surveys and no in-person interviews, which were suspended on March 20 due to the COVID-19 outbreak. As a result, the response rate was 12 percentage points lower than in the first quarter. Still, experts said an increase in the rate would not have been out of line of the recent trend in increasing homeownership, largely because of millennials taking advantage of low mortgage rates. Last week, the rate on the 30-year mortgage was 3.01%, just barely higher than the all-time low of 2.98% it hit in the prior week, according to Freddie Mac.

Rural Real Estate Prices Rise as People Consider Leaving Cities

Submitted by ckanon@abi.org on
The COVID-19 pandemic has already changed the way Americans live, but its long-term repercussions may be with our world even after the virus is eventually controlled, NBC News reported. Recent data serves as a reminder of how consequential the coronavirus could be to the country’s future, even beyond health concerns. The most common word associated with the virus, through its rise and plateau and renewed rise, might be uncertainty — and that mood is reflected in a shift in how Americans are spending. The COVID crisis is challenging and changing long-held consumer patterns. The shifts happening during the pandemic are not only far-reaching, they potentially could endure long after a vaccine or treatment is found. New data that shows an even more enduring change could be coming: New attitudes about where people want to live, as people are interested in moving and there seems to be an increasing appeal in properties outside of cities. These figures, which compared this June to June 2019, found that homes in rural and suburban zip codes saw the biggest jump in average views per property.

Small-Business Bankruptcy Program Adds New Risk to Home Equity Loans

Submitted by ckanon@abi.org on
To their list of worries about how the coronavirus pandemic is affecting customers and their own bottom lines, bankers can now add this: a potential spike in home mortgage modifications tied to small-businesses bankruptcies, the American Banker reported. Last year, Congress made changes to the Bankruptcy Code that allowed borrowers to modify these second mortgages in the event their businesses fail, perhaps saving them from having to sell their homes to settle their debts. Protections were further expanded when the coronavirus relief package was passed in March. While these changes provide a measure of relief to borrowers — particularly with bankruptcies expected to increase as the pandemic drags on — they can cause problems for banks and investors that hold the loans. That’s because interest rates are often lowered in the modification process, reducing a loan’s value. “It could be a headache in that a mortgage that a lender thought was not modifiable is now suddenly modifiable,” said Bonnie Pollack of Cullen and Dykman LLP who represents lenders in these new bankruptcy cases. Banks have been combing through their portfolios searching for which mortgages might suddenly be modified in the new bankruptcy program. An exact number across the industry is hard to pin down, but a 2018 survey by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. sheds some light on how often small-business owners use the equity in their homes to secure a loan.
Article Tags

Big Banks’ Request HUD Not to Weaken Redlining Rule

Submitted by jhartgen@abi.org on

Executives from the country’s four biggest banks — Bank of America, Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo — have asked the Department of Housing and Urban Development not to rewrite requirements to ensure they’re not accidentally discriminating against Black and Latino customers in their mortgage businesses, the New York Times reported. “HUD should acknowledge that Americans’ attention to racial discrimination is more pronounced and expansive,” Michael DeVito, Wells Fargo’s executive vice president for home lending, said in a letter to HUD Secretary Ben Carson on Tuesday. “People across the country have considered more closely that centuries of discrimination, segregation and economic disenfranchisement have lasting impacts today, including discriminatory effects in housing,” DeVito wrote. Although the banks stopped short of saying no policy change should ever be made, the request for a delay was unusual in the world of finance, where firms regularly seek fewer regulations. The proposed change would spare the banks from fines and legal fees by effectively reducing the number of lawsuits and government enforcement actions against them. It would also make it easier for banks to use algorithms and artificial intelligence to market, underwrite and price home loans without worrying whether those calculations accidentally discriminated against disadvantaged groups. But the banks may be realizing there’s more to the issue than the regulatory and legal considerations. The proposed rule governs the concept of “disparate impact,” in which a practice by a lender or housing provider creates an unequal playing field, even if unintentionally. Policies that have a disparate impact on disadvantaged groups are illegal under the Fair Housing Act of 1968.

As Big U.S. Banks Let Customers Delay Payments, Loan Losses Remain Unclear

Submitted by jhartgen@abi.org on

Major U.S. bank executives this week said that they extended forbearance programs to millions of credit card, auto loan and mortgage customers who were financially hard hit by the coronavirus pandemic, Reuters reported. While that is good news for customers who need more time to pay their bills, the delays mean some of the largest U.S. banks may not know how many consumer loans have gone bad until the end of this year or early next. “Significant credit card losses won’t show up until 180 days past the end of (forbearance) programs,” Bank of America Chief Financial Officer Paul Donofrio said yesterday. “I would not expect to see significantly higher losses until 2021.” JPMorgan Chase & Co., Bank of America, Citigroup and Wells Fargo & Co. have all extended programs launched this spring that allow customers to delay payments on their credit card balances or loans without incurring late fees or hurting their credit. The four banks set aside $38 billion this quarter for loans that could go bad, according to Reuters calculations.

House Financial Services Committee Hearing Today to Examine Mortgage Services' Implementation of the CARES Act

Submitted by jhartgen@abi.org on

The House Financial Services Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations will hold a hearing at noon ET today titled "Protecting Homeowners During the Pandemic: Oversight of Mortgage Servicers’ Implementation of the CARES Act." For the full witness list, access to prepare testimony and a link to the live webcast of the hearing, please click here.