Skip to main content

%1

How the Child Care Crisis Will Distort the Economy for a Generation

Submitted by ckanon@abi.org on
Schools across the U.S. are closed. Parents are exhausted from  round-the-clock care while trying to work from home, and kids are slipping behind academically. Now comes the bad news: We haven’t seen the worst of it yet, Politico reported. When the economist Betsey Stevenson looks at the pandemic-era economic crisis, she sees a long-simmering child care crisis that has suddenly surged to the foreground of people’s lives — and whose true scope we’ve barely begun to reckon with. Its potential to inflict lasting damage to the economy is enormous, and it’s getting short shrift in the recovery plans coming out of Washington. “The work of recovering from it will not end just because we have a vaccine,” says Stevenson, a labor economist at the University of Michigan and former member of President Barack Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers. “We are making choices right now about where we will be as an economy in 20 years, in 30 years, based on what we do with these kids.” Among those most likely to be affected are working mothers, who shoulder an outsize share of child care responsibilities, and have suddenly had far more work dropped in their laps. Women already need to make difficult choices between work advancement and their family roles, which can bring down their incomes over time; Stevenson expects the crisis to make that conflict sharply worse: “The impact of the child care crisis on women’s outcomes is going to be felt over the next decade.”

Nostalgic for 2019: Three in Four Americans Worry Life Will Never Go Back to “Normal”

Submitted by ckanon@abi.org on
Remember the good old days, way back in 2019? It’s an odd feeling to be nostalgic for a time that just passed, but according to a new survey of 2,000 Americans, many are worried the world will never return to its simpler, pre-coronavirus state, Study Finds reported. All in all, 75% of those surveyed said they fear life will never return to what was once “normal.” The survey, commissioned by Torch, asks respondents how they envision the world will appear in the wake of COVID-19. One overarching theme that participants echo is just how different the workplace, and employment in general, will be. As of now, 59% of surveyed Americans admit that they would be far too afraid to start reporting to a shared workplace once again. Meanwhile, 36% have concerns they’ll <em>never</em> be able to get back to the office without potentially putting themselves and their family in harm’s way. In broader terms, 63% of participants flat out say that their job will never be the same. That same group is anticipating working remotely for at least the rest of 2020.

Trump Administration Proposal Would Push 3 Million Americans Off Food Stamps

Submitted by ckanon@abi.org on
The U.S. Department of Agriculture proposed new rules to limit access to food stamps for households with savings and other assets, a measure that officials said would cut benefits to about 3 million people, The Washington Post reported. U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue and Acting Deputy Under Secretary Brandon Lipps said that the proposed new rules for the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP) were aimed at ending automatic eligibility for those who were already receiving federal and state assistance. “This proposal will save money and preserve the integrity of the program,” Perdue said. “SNAP should be a temporary safety net.” About 40 million low-income people received SNAP benefits in 2018. Forty-three states routinely grant eligibility to low-income people already receiving other government benefits, without undergoing income or asset tests. Lipps said the proposal would result in an annual budgetary savings of $2.5 billion and restrict less needy individuals from qualifying for benefits. USDA officials said that the proposal was aimed at closing a loophole that was famously exploited by a wealthy Minnesota man, Rob Undersander, who claims he received food stamps for 19 months despite owning significant assets such as property and bank accounts. Lipps said that the proposal aimed to make sure that beneficiaries are treated equally across all states, and that recipients’ geographic location should not dictate their benefit level. The USDA officials had no specifics on the financial cutoff for their proposal. Current rules give states latitude to raise SNAP income eligibility limits so that low-income families with housing and child care costs that consume a sizable share of their income can continue to receive help affording adequate food. This option also allows states to adopt less restrictive asset tests so that families, seniors and people with a disability can have modest savings or own their own home without losing SNAP benefits.