Skip to main content

%1

A Step Too Far in the Right Direction? Narrowing § 546(e)’s Settlement Payment Safe Harbor by Broadly Defining the “Mere Conduit” Rule

In July 2016, the Seventh Circuit issued its decision in FTI Consulting v. Merit Mgmt. Grp. LP (FTI). There, the appellant asked the court to review the application of 11 U.S.C. § 546(e) (the safe harbor), which protects settlement payments made “by or to (or on the behalf of)” a broad range of financial institutions, intermediaries and brokers (collectively, financial actors) from many types of avoidance actions.

Committee Call: Uniform Voidable Transactions ACT

The topic of the most recent Commercial Fraud Committee call, discussed the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act (UVTA), formerly named the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA), which was amended (and retitled) in 2014 for the first time since its creation in 1984. According to the Uniform Law Commission, the amended Act, which strengthens creditor protections by providing remedies for certain transactions by a debtor that are unfair to the debtor’s creditors, addresses a small number of narrowly-defined issues and is not a comprehensive revision of the Act.

Over Thirty Years Later Johns-Manville Asbestos Litigation Still Alive

On June 30, 2016, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York issued yet another decision around the Johns-Manville asbestos litigation. Before the court was Graphic Packaging International’s emergency motion to enforce the confirmation and channeling orders in the Johns-Manville Corp. (“Manville”) and the Manville Forest Products Corp. (“MFP”) chapter 11 cases. The motion sought to enjoin an asbestos-related lawsuit brought in Louisiana state court against Graphic, the successor of MFP.

Second Circuit: “Free and Clear” Section 363 Sale Order Does Not Enjoin Faulty Ignition Switch Claims Against General Motors

In 2009, General Motors (“Old GM”) commenced an historic chapter 11 case. With federal government backing, Old GM sold the bulk of its business and assets “free and clear” of liabilities to the new entity (“New GM”) predominantly owned by the U.S. Treasury, emerging from chapter 11 in just 40 days. In the contentious aftermath, courts have continued to grapple with issues arising from the case. On July 13, 2016, a Second Circuit panel reversed in part a decision by the U.S.