Skip to main content

%1

Selling Assets in Chapter 15 Matters: Practical Considerations in Cross-Border Insolvencies

Asset sales under § 363 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code[1] have become a critical component of the bankruptcy practitioner’s arsenal, and a preferred avenue of monetizing a debtor’s assets. The process is generally straightforward, and the Bankruptcy Code provides the framework of how sales should proceed. U.S.

Pension Fund Withdrawal Liability: No Problem for § 363 Sale

Section 363 allows a debtor to sell its assets free and clear of interests in such property. If a creditor has a significant claim on a debtor’s assets, a § 363 sale may allow a debtor to sell its assets at a higher price than it could outside of bankruptcy. When debtors attempted a § 363 sale of their assets in In re K & D Industrial Services, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Michigan addressed whether they could make the sale free and clear of a pension fund’s claim.

2017 Winter Leadership Conference - The Role Of Financial Advisors And Investment Bankers In Bankruptcy Sales

Hosted by the Asset Sales and Financial Advisors and Investment Banking Committees. FAs, IBs, RE advisors, attorneys: too many cooks in the kitchen? This panel will discuss the anatomy of the bankruptcy sales process and focus on optimizing value by drawing on the resource skills of attorneys, investment banks, financial advisors and real estate advisors.

Committee Webinar - Creditor Committees and Individual Creditors in Asset Sales

The Asset Sales Committee will host a webinar on the roles of secured, undersecured and unsecured creditors and committees in asset sales and bidding processes involving complex capital structures. The discussion will focus on the challenges and complications that can arise in seeking an expedited sale free and clear of claims and liens and means by which creditors and committees can use the sale process to their advantage.

Stalking-Horse Bid Protections: Getting the “Credit” You Deserve at the § 363 Auction

Investors and those representing them go to great lengths to maximize the value of their deals in § 363 asset purchases. But if they’re not careful, they could easily find themselves in the following auction scenario, where a little ambiguity jeopardizes significant value that a “stalking horse” bidder thought it had already negotiated.

The Scenario