Skip to main content

%1

In re Family Christian: Michigan Bankruptcy Court Holds § 503(b)(9) Claims Are “Freight” that Must Be Paid in 363 Asset Sale

In June 2015, Bankruptcy Judge John T. Gregg ruled in In re Family Christian[1] that all administrative priority claims, including those arising under § 503(b)(9), must be paid as part of the price of a § 363 sale of the debtor’s assets.

Factual Background

GM Second Circuit Appellate Briefing on Appeal of Bankruptcy Court Successor Liability/Due Process Decision

One of the most significant benefits of acquiring assets out of a bankruptcy estate is the ability to obtain those assets free and clear of liens, claims, interests and encumbrances, pursuant to § 363 of the Bankruptcy Code and the terms of a bankruptcy court sale order. In certain circuits, including the Second Circuit, the term “interests” includes not only in rem interests, but in personam interests as well, such as successor liability claims.

Committee Call: Gifting in 363 Sales and Plans

The Unsecured Trade Creditors' Committee's call discussed “gifting” and other recent developments regarding application of the absolute priority rule. In In re ICL Holding, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals recently held that “gifting” is permissible in section 363 sales. Conversely, in prior opinions, both the Second and Third Circuits have held that “gifting” is not permissible in the context of a chapter 11 plan.