Ashley Romeo
St. John’s University School of Law
American Bankruptcy Institute Law Review Staff
Victoria Rey
St. John’s University School of Law
American Bankruptcy Institute Law Review Staff
Latif Pelinku
St. John’s University School of Law
American Bankruptcy Institute Law Review Staff
Joseph Parone
St. John’s University School of Law
American Bankruptcy Institute Law Review Staff
Hayung Park
St. John’s University School of Law
American Bankruptcy Institute Law Review Staff
Richard Ortiz
St. John’s University School of Law
American Bankruptcy Institute Law Review Staff
Demetri Mihalios
St. John’s University School of Law
American Bankruptcy Institute Law Review Staff
Kalina Mesrobian
St. John’s University School of Law
American Bankruptcy Institute Law Review Staff
According to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, a beneficiary of an independent pension improvement fund is not entitled to defer a ruling on the debtor’s objections to them in abeyance by asserting that contingent claims may arise in the future.[1]
Brendan McLaughlin
St. John’s University School of Law
American Bankruptcy Institute Law Review Staff
Ori Kopilev
St. John’s University School of Law
American Bankruptcy Institute Law Review Staff