Skip to main content
ABI Journal

November 03, 2020

Sixth Circuit Creates a Split: The 14-Day Deadline for an Appeal Is Not Jurisdictional

Impliedly overruling the law in five circuits, the Supreme Court changed the rules for deciding when a deadline is jurisdictional, the Sixth Circuit says.

6th Circuit

October 19, 2020

California Judge Explains Why Acevedo Doesn’t Bar Retroactive Orders

Retroactive and nunc pro tunc orders aren’t the same thing, Judge Jaime says. Orders may be retroactive when the power is implied by statute.

9th Circuit, California, California Eastern District

October 14, 2020

‘13’ Plans Already in Default on March 27 May Be Extended Under the CARES Act

Judge Grabill finds nothing in Section 1329(d) to preclude extending the duration of a plan if payments were already in default when the CARES Act was enacted on March 27.

5th Circuit, Louisiana, Louisiana Eastern District

October 13, 2020

Unrepentant Lender Slammed with $260,000 in Damages for an ‘Egregious’ Stay Violation

Lender soon recognized that home foreclosure violated the stay but continued denying liability through seven years of litigation.

4th Circuit, North Carolina, North Carolina Western District

October 13, 2020

Supreme Court Hears Argument in Fulton: Is Inaction an Automatic Stay Violation?

Supreme Court to resolve a circuit split by deciding whether a change in the status quo must occur before the automatic stay is violated.

Supreme Court

October 08, 2020

Chapter 13 Debtors Retain Appreciation in Property After Conversion or Plan Amendment

On an issue where the courts are split, the Tenth Circuit BAP sides with debtors and allows them to retain postpetition appreciation in the value of assets that were in the estate on filing.

10th Circuit

October 05, 2020

Courts Remain Split on Allowing Credit Counseling on the Same Day but After Filing

Another judge follows statutory language that didn’t achieve the result Congress probably intended.

10th Circuit, Colorado

October 02, 2020

Eleventh Circuit Reads Husky Narrowly, Perhaps Too Narrowly

Reading Husky narrowly, the Eleventh Circuit requires that fraud occur before a debt arises to make the debt nondischargeable under Section 523(a)(2)(A).

11th Circuit

October 01, 2020

Repaying Salary After Arrest Isn’t Compensation for Loss and Isn’t Dischargeable

An obligation can be penal in nature, and thus nondischargeable, even though it’s measured by pecuniary loss.

3rd Circuit, New Jersey

September 30, 2020

On a Split, Long Island Judge Allows Selling a Home Despite the Homeowner’s Objection

A homestead exemption does not bar selling a home when the chapter 7 debtor has no equity in the property, Judge Robert Grossman says.

2nd Circuit, New York, New York Eastern District