Skip to main content

%1

Global Regulators to Cut List of Too-Big-To-Fail Banks to 28

Submitted by webadmin on

Global regulators will publish a list of 28 too-big-to-fail banks that must hold additional capital, one less than the 29 identified last year, Bloomberg News reported today. The list will be published today in advance of a Nov. 4 meeting in Mexico of finance officials from the world’s biggest economies. The Financial Stability Board last year published a list of 29 banks that should hold more capital than required by other international agreements because of their importance to the global financial system. Citigroup Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., BNP Paribas SA, Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc, and HSBC Holdings Plc were provisionally earmarked to face the top level of surcharges, set at 2.5 percent of risk-weighted assets. The most likely bank to drop off the updated list is Dexia SA, the Franco-Belgian lender that is being broken up after losing access to unsecured funding, Karel Lannoo, chief executive officer of the Centre for European Policy Studies in Brussels, said last month.

Barclays Faces 435 Million Fine Another Probe

Submitted by webadmin on

Barclays PLC faced a double-barreled assault from U.S. authorities, as the federal energy-market regulator sought a record $435 million in penalties for the bank's alleged manipulation of U.S. electricity markets, and the lender also disclosed that it was facing a U.S. anti-corruption investigation, the Wall Street Journal reported today. The corruption investigation, being conducted by the Justice Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission, focuses on potential violations during the bank's efforts to raise money from Middle Eastern investors in the early days of the financial crisis. Barclays said yesterday that it is investigating the matter itself and cooperating with authorities.

Senators Call for an End to Volcker Rule Delay

Submitted by webadmin on

Democratic lawmakers yesterday criticized regulators for taking too long to finalize the Volcker Rule, a controversial provision passed in 2010 aimed at restricting banks from making risky investments with their own money, the Washington Post reported today. Democratic Sens. Carl Levin (Mich.) and Jeff Merkley (Ore.) said that the uncertainty surrounding the Volcker Rule jeopardizes the health of the economy. During the legislative debate on the Dodd-Frank Act in 2010, Merkley and Levin spearheaded the amendment banning banks from using their own capital to make trades, a practice known as proprietary trading. The provision called for stricter prohibitions than what was initially proposed by former Fed chairman Paul Volcker. But critics of the legislation argue that the rule unnecessarily limits some safe forms of trading and will severely affect profit at some of the nation’s largest banks. Ratings agency Standard & Poor’s issued a report this week the Volcker rule could reduce pre-tax earnings for the eight largest banks by up to $10 billion a year. Investment banks Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs stand to lose the most because a hefty percentage of their revenue is derived from trading.

Analysis One Year After MF Global New Protections for Customer Money

Submitted by webadmin on

Nearly a year after MF Global raided customer accounts in a failed bid to survive, regulators moved this week to tighten restrictions for brokerage firms and adopt new safeguards for client money, the New York Times DealBook blog reported yesterday. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission voted unanimously to propose new customer protections aimed at closing loopholes, bolstering internal controls and forcing firms to provide more disclosures to their clients. The proposal, which may be changed over the next several months, comes as the futures industry suffers a crisis of confidence in the wake of the MF Global debacle.

Regulators Clash over Volcker Definitions

Submitted by webadmin on

A rift has emerged among regulators responsible for crafting the Volcker rule, one of the most complex and contentious regulations of the landmark Dodd-Frank financial overhaul, the Wall Street Journal reported today. The dispute, between U.S. banking regulators and the Securities and Exchange Commission, casts doubt on whether regulators will finish drafting the rule by the end of the year and raises the unattractive possibility that the agencies will issue conflicting standards. The SEC and a trio of banking regulators are butting heads over how to define the buying and selling of securities on behalf of clients, as well as over banks' ability to invest in outside investment vehicles such as hedge funds. Since brokers, which are overseen by the SEC, conduct market-making activities, the SEC is pushing for more influence over the issue.

States Shift Foreclosure-Suit Funds

Submitted by webadmin on



ABI Bankruptcy Brief | October 18, 2012


 


  

October 18, 2012

 

home  |  newsroom  |  chart of the day  |  blogs  |  bankruptcy code and rules  |  statistics  |  legislative news  |  volo
  NEWS AND ANALYSIS   

STATES SHIFT FORECLOSURE-SUIT FUNDS



When states received $2.5 billion from big banks in a mortgage-foreclosure settlement earlier this year, the expectation was that most of it would be used to aid distressed homeowners, but a new report claims that less than half of the money has been designated for that cause so far, the Wall Street Journal reported today. States used much of the settlement money to help close budget gaps, says a report scheduled for release Thursday. In March, 49 states reached a $25 billion settlement with five of the nation's largest mortgage lenders over charges that they had improperly processed foreclosures. The agreement allowed the banks—Ally Financial Inc., Bank of America Corp., Citibank Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Wells Fargo & Co.—to pay $20 billion of the settlement in the form of relief to distressed homeowners. The states received $2.5 billion of the total. Only about $1 billion of the state funds have been designated for some type of homeowner aid, while $1 billion will go toward state general funds. States haven't decided how to spend the remaining $500 million, according to the report by Enterprise Community Partners, a housing nonprofit. Only 14 states plan to spend their entire allotment on housing relief, according to the report. Read more. (Subscription required.)

DUELING REPORTS LEAVE CONGRESS CONTINUING TO FIGHT OVER "TOO BIG TO FAIL"



Republican and Democratic leaders on the House Financial Services Committee are continuing their battle over the Dodd-Frank financial reform law in a pair of competing reports, The Hill reported yesterday. Nearly two and half years after the Wall Street overhaul was signed into law, the two parties remain entrenched on one of its fundamental questions: Does the law end the problem of firms being "too big to fail" and requiring bailouts? Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), a key author of the law and top Democrat on the committee, on Monday released a report intended to rebut GOP arguments that Dodd-Frank codifies "too big to fail" and explicitly identifies banks as such. “The Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act clearly establishes a framework that allows large financial firms to fail while preventing catastrophic harm to the broader economy," according to the report, compiled by Democratic committee staff. Just two days later, Committee Chairman Spencer Bachus (R-Ala.) fired back with a report of his own. While shorter, this report contended that the law actually codified essential firms that the government would have to bail out. One provision of the law allows regulators to identify banks and other institutions as "systemically significant." Republicans contend that this label hands out an advantage to the singled-out firms and that the government has effectively identified them as "too big to fail." But the Democrats contend in their study that this designation comes with increased regulation and oversight, as well as a requirement that the institutions establish "living wills" that would detail how they could be unraveled if they were on the brink of collapse. Read more.

COMMENTARY: WHY THE FDIC'S APPROACH TO FINANCIAL FAILURES MAKES SENSE



The FDIC's single receivership approach offers a better way to avoid an uncoordinated and destabilizing series of insolvencies for systemically important financial institutions, according to a commentary in yesterday's New York Times DealBook blog by Michael H. Krimminger, the former general counsel of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. The agency proposes, if it is appointed and where possible, to close the financial holding company, but keep the viable subsidiaries operating. Subsidiaries that are not viable would be closed and gradually wound down to prevent a sudden collapse, as occurred in the case of Lehman, according to Krimminger. The holding company would be restructured into a bridge entity that can continue to provide financing to viable subsidiaries. Access to funding is critical to continued operations. Dodd-Frank provides for this financing from an "orderly liquidation fund," and it must be paid back from the sale of the subsidiaries or from assessments from the industry. The shareholders and creditors of the holding company – which owned the subsidiaries – bear the losses for the failure as no losses can be borne by taxpayers, according to Krimminger's commentary. Read more.

REGULATORS PROPOSE CAPITAL RULES FOR DERIVATIVES TRADING



Federal authorities moved a step closer to overhauling the derivatives market yesterday, as regulators proposed tougher standards for the nation's biggest banks, the New York Times DealBook blog reported. Firms like Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase would have to bolster their capital cushion and post additional collateral for certain derivatives trades. The Securities and Exchange Commission proposed the crackdown as part of a broader effort to rein in the opaque derivatives business, a main player in the financial crisis. "These rules are intended to make the financial system safer, and the derivative markets fairer, more efficient, and more transparent," SEC chair Mary L. Schapiro said. Schapiro and the agency's commissioners voted unanimously, 5-0, to advance the plan. It now enters a 60-day public comment period, after which the SEC and other federal regulators must finalize the rules. Read more.

ABI IN-DEPTH

MEMBERS WILL NOT WANT TO MISS ABI'S PROGRAM AT NCBJ'S ANNUAL MEETING ON OCT. 26



Members planning to attend the 86th Annual NCBJ Annual Conference in San Diego from Oct. 24-27 will not want to miss the exciting line-up scheduled for the ABI program track on Oct. 26. In addition to roundtable discussions on the hottest consumer and business bankruptcy topics, ABI will be hosting a ticketed luncheon that will feature the presentation of the 7th Annual Judge William L. Norton, Jr. Judicial Excellence Award and entertainment by Apollo Robbins, a sleight-of hand artist, security consultant and self-described gentleman thief. Click here to register for the Conference.

To view the list of ABI programs on Oct. 26 and the full NCBJ Annual Conference schedule, please click here.



ABI's Chapter 11 Reform Commission will also be holding a public hearing on Oct. 26 from 2:30-4:30 p.m. PT at the San Diego Marriott. Interested parties have the opportunity to submit testimony at the hearing. For further information, please contact ABI Executive Director Samuel J. Gerdano at sgerdano@abiworld.org.

LATEST CASE SUMMARY ON VOLO: IN RE GLEASON (11TH CIR.)



Summarized by Michael Pugh of Thompson, O'Brien, Kemp & Nasuti, PC

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the order entered by the bankruptcy court and upheld on appeal by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida that suspended an attorney who practiced bankruptcy law from practice before the bankruptcy court for 60 days. The Court of Appeals ruled that the sanctions order did not violate the attorney's First Amendment right to free speech or Fifth Amendment right to due process, and that the bankruptcy court did not clearly err in determining that the attorney's actions amounted to bad faith that warranted the imposition of sanctions.

There are more than 650 appellate opinions summarized on Volo, and summaries typically appear within 24 hours of the ruling. Click here regularly to view the latest case summaries on ABI’s Volo website.

NEW ON ABI’S BANKRUPTCY BLOG EXCHANGE: AIDING AND ABETTING CLAIMS IN PONZI CASES ARE STILL ALIVE AND WELL



The Bankruptcy Blog Exchange is a free ABI service that tracks 35 bankruptcy-related blogs. A recent blog post examines how aiding and abetting claims against banks in Ponzi scheme cases continue to gain traction in the case law.

Be sure to check the site several times each day; any time a contributing blog posts a new story, a link to the story will appear on the top. If you have a blog that deals with bankruptcy, or know of a good blog that should be part of the Bankruptcy Exchange, please contact the ABI Web team.

ABI Quick Poll

Section 523(a)(8) should be amended to allow private student loans to be discharged in bankruptcy.

Click here to vote on this week's Quick Poll. Click here to view the results of previous Quick Polls.

HAVE YOU TUNED IN TO BLOOMBERG LAW'S VIDEO PODCASTS?



Bloomberg Law's video podcasts feature top experts speaking about current bankruptcy topics. The podcasts are available via Bloomberg Law's YouTube channel so that you can access the programs from your computer or device of your choice! Click here to view the Bloomberg Law video podcasts.

INSOL INTERNATIONAL



INSOL International is a worldwide federation of national associations for accountants and lawyers who specialize in turnaround and insolvency. There are currently 37 member associations worldwide with more than 9,000 professionals participating as members of INSOL International. As a member association of INSOL, ABI's members receive a discounted subscription rate. See ABI's enrollment page for details.

Have a Twitter, Facebook or LinkedIn Account?

Join our networks to expand yours.

  

 

TOMORROW:

 

ABI/ST. JOHN'S "BANKRUPTCY AND RACE: IS THERE A RELATION?" SYMPOSIUM

Oct. 19, 2012

Register Today!

 

 

COMING UP:

 

 

ABI'S PROGRAM AT NCBJ'S ANNUAL MEETING

Oct. 26, 2012

Register Today!

 

 

MEXICO 2012

Oct. 29, 2012

Register Today!

 

 

MEXICO 2012

Nov. 7, 2012

Register Today!

 

 

4TH ANNUAL PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM

Nov. 9, 2012

Register Today!

 

 

SE 2012

Nov. 12, 2012

Register Today!

 

 

SE 2012

Nov. 29 - Dec. 1, 2012

Register Today!

 

 

MT 2012

Dec. 4-8, 2012

Register Today!

 

 

ACBPIKC 2013

Jan. 24-25, 2013

Register Today!

 

 

ACBPIKC 2013

Feb. 7-9, 2013

Register Today!

 

 

ACBPIKC 2013

Feb. 17-19, 2013

Register Today!

 

   
  CALENDAR OF EVENTS
 

October

- ABI/St. John's "Bankruptcy and Race: Is There a Relation?" Symposium

     October 19, 2012 | Queens, N.Y.

- ABI Program at NCBJ's Annual Conference

     October 26, 2012 | San Diego, Calif.

- ABI Endowment Event at Peter Max Gallery

     October 29, 2012 | New York, N.Y.

November

- U.S./Mexico Restructuring Symposium

     November 7, 2012 | Mexico City, Mexico

- Professional Development Program

     November 9, 2012 | New York, N.Y.

- Detroit Consumer Bankruptcy Conference

     November 12, 2012 | Detroit, Mich.

- Winter Leadership Conference

     November 29 - December 1, 2012 | Tucson, Ariz.

  

 

December

- Forty-Hour Bankruptcy Mediation Training

     December 4-8, 2012 | New York, N.Y.

2013

January

- Rocky Mountain Bankruptcy Conference

     January 24-25, 2013 | Denver, Colo.

February

- Caribbean Insolvency Symposium

     February 7-9, 2013 | Miami, Fla.

- Kansas City Advanced Consumer Bankruptcy Practice Institute

     February 17-19, 2013 | Kansas City, Mo.


 
 

ABI BookstoreABI Endowment Fund ABI Endowment Fund
 


SEC Accuses Hedge Fund of Lying About Performance

Submitted by webadmin on

The Securities and Exchange Commission filed a complaint yesterday against a hedge fund that once managed as much as $1 billion in assets, accusing the firm of lying to its investors about performance and asset values to earn higher fees, the New York Times DealBook reported yesterday. The agency said that as a result of the misrepresentation, the fund, Yorkville Advisors, persuaded investors to give it $280 million to manage, which translated into more than $10 million in excess fees. The complaint also names its founder and president, Mark Angelo, and its chief financial officer, Edward Schinik.

SEC Probes Bankrupt San Bernardino Calif.s Finances

Submitted by webadmin on

A U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission “informal inquiry” of San Bernardino, Calif.'s finances requires the bankrupt city to preserve bond documents and communications with underwriters, Bloomberg News reported today. The nature of the agency’s inquiry isn’t detailed in the Oct. 11 letter from Robert H. Conrrad, a Los Angeles-based SEC senior enforcement counsel, to City Attorney James Penman. It calls on city officials to preserve all records of securities offerings and written communications with underwriters, fiscal advisers and credit ratings companies. The SEC has stepped up efforts to enforce disclosure rules that apply to states and cities that raise money from investors, and has said it plans to recommend ways to improve regulation of the $3.7 trillion municipal-bond market.

Analysis How Pennies Add Up in a Securities Fraud Case

Submitted by webadmin on

Charges filed by the Justice Department last week accuse two former brokers at the New York office of Linkbrokers Derivatives, Marek Leszczynski and Benjamin Chouchane, of securities fraud and conspiracy for secretly adding a few pennies to the cost of securities trades processed by the firm to generate $18.7 million in gains, the New York Times DealBook blog reported yesterday. A sales trader and middle-office assistant at the firm, Henry A. Condron, entered a guilty plea and is cooperating in the government's case. The Securities and Exchange Commission also filed civil charges against the three men, and added another broker as a defendant who was not named in the criminal case.

ABI Tags

Stress for Banks as Tests Loom

Submitted by webadmin on

U.S. banks and the Federal Reserve are battling over a new round of "stress tests" even before the annual exams get going later this fall, the Wall Street Journal reported today. The clash centers on the math regulators are using to produce the results. Bankers want more detail on how the calculations are made, and the Fed thus far has resisted disclosing more than it has already. A senior Fed supervision official, Timothy Clark, irked some bankers last month when he said at a private conference that they would not get additional information about the methodology. Smaller banks will soon have to grapple with similar requirements. Three U.S. banking regulators—the Fed, the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.—plan today to complete rules requiring smaller banks with more than $10 billion in assets to also run an internal stress test each year. That would widen the pool of test participants beyond the Fed's current requirement of $50 billion in assets, a group comprised of 30 banks.