New Yorks High Court Considers Fees From Defunct Law Firms
The debate over who deserves to profit from work that originated at a law firm that collapsed comes to a head on Wednesday when New York's highest court will hear arguments in cases stemming from the bankruptcies of Coudert Brothers LLP, which went under in 2005, and Thelen LLP, which closed in 2008, the Wall Street Journal reported today. A decision by the New York Court of Appeals will provide clarity into how much money, if any, should flow back to defunct firms' creditors, including those of the biggest U.S. law-firm failure ever, Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP. At issue is whether the estates of bankrupt law firms have stakes in so-called unfinished business, the assignments taken by partners to a new firm as their old firm dissolves. Bankruptcy administrators have long argued that the failing firms have valid claims. But partners at the nation's top law firms say that client business isn't a commodity that can be bought and sold. They say that clients have the freedom to choose counsel, and lawyers — and their new employers — shouldn't be punished for sticking with an assignment after a law firm collapses.