%1
SEC Venue Target of House Bill
A new bill in Congress seeks to curb securities regulators' purported in-house advantage over defendants who are brought before the agency's administrative law judges, the National Law Journal reported today. But law scholars who have crunched the numbers say that the legislation is inspired by incomplete data. Rep. Scott Garrett (R-N.J.) last month introduced the Due Process Restoration Act of 2015, which gives targets of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission the right to terminate any proceeding the agency brings in front of an administrative law judge rather than in a U.S. district court. The bill would also boost the government's standard of proof for any defendant who keeps a case in the administrative venue. Individual and corporate defendants have spent several years challenging the commission's forum selection, arguing that administrative proceedings unfairly strip constitutional due process and jury rights that would otherwise be available in a federal trial court.
SEC Takes Tougher Stance on Enforcement in J.P. Morgan Case
Federal regulators want to restrict JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s ability to raise funds for clients, in an effort to impose a broader range of consequences on financial firms accused of breaking the rules, the Wall Street Journal reported today. J.P. Morgan has already agreed to pay more than $200 million to resolve allegations by the Securities and Exchange Commission and other regulators that it didn’t make proper disclosures when touting its own investment products to clients over those offered by its competitors. But the settlement has been held up for several weeks by the SEC’s demands that J.P. Morgan also accept limits on its ability to sell stock or bonds via private placements for several years.
Obama Picks Wall Street Bailout Critic, Corporate Governance Expert for SEC
President Obama yesterday nominated Lisa M. Fairfax, a professor at the George Washington University Law School, and Hester Peirce, a senior research fellow at George Mason University’s Mercatus Center and a critic of financial reform, to serve as members of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Washington Post reported today. Fairfax and Peirce would fill seats at the five-member SEC, which is chaired by Mary Jo White. One seat, left by departing Republican Daniel Gallagher, is currently vacant, and the term of one of the four current members, Democrat Luis A. Aguilar, expires this year. Fairfax, a corporate governance expert, has experience in securities industry enforcement from her service on the review council of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, a private corporation that acts as a self-regulatory organization for the industry. In that role, she adjudicated appeals by brokerage firms and brokers accused of breaking the law. Peirce is a well-known critic of the government’s Wall Street bailout and the legislation that expanded regulatory requirements after the financial crisis.
SEC Readies Clawback Rules for Punishing Bad Accounting
The Securities and Exchange Commission is about to issue new rules that would require companies to punish accounting missteps by clawing back pay from a wider range of top executives, the Wall Street Journal reported today. Many companies object to the proposed rules, which are awaiting the SEC’s final approval after a public-comment period ended last month. Corporate critics say that the rules could wallop executives who had no knowledge of errors in the books or any role in overseeing them. The Dodd-Frank Act of 2010 required the SEC to write the rules, in hopes that putting executive pay at risk would discourage fraud and undue risk taking. The rules apply only to pay that is tied to a company’s financial performance, a type that is increasingly common.

SEC Trims Use of In-House Judges
The Securities and Exchange Commission has quietly pulled back on its use of in-house judges, a practice that had brought upon it criticism and legal challenges, the Wall Street Journal reported today. SEC leaders defend the fairness of using agency administrative law judges even for serious, contested cases, in accordance with the powers the agency gained through the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial law. A review of 160 cases affecting more than 500 defendants shows that in the three months through September, the SEC sent just 11 percent—four of 36—of its contested cases to its administrative law judges. That was down from 40 percent in the like period of 2014. For the full fiscal year ended Sept. 30, the SEC used its internal tribunal for 28 percent of its contested cases, compared with 43 percent for the previous 12 months, according to the analysis and SEC data, both of which exclude settled and routine cases.
A U.S. Recession Just Got a Little More Likely
Pierluisi Introduces Legislation Authorizing U.S. Treasury Department to Guarantee Future Puerto Rico Bonds
|
|
|
Global Markets Rebound on Yellen Speech
Appeal by “Diva of Distressed” Spotlights SEC In-House Court
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's controversial use of in-house judges to enforce federal securities laws is about to undergo a major test, Reuters reported yesterday. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit today will hear arguments over whether to revive a lawsuit by Lynn Tilton, a private equity chief dubbed the "Diva of Distressed," to block the SEC from pursuing fraud charges in an in-house administrative proceeding instead of federal court. Critics say that the proceedings are unfair because there are no juries, and defense lawyers have a limited ability to depose witnesses and gather evidence. Some, including Tilton, also say the appointment of administrative judges, who are on the SEC payroll, is unconstitutional. The SEC charged Tilton and her Patriarch Partners firm in March with hiding the poor performance of assets underlying three collateralized loan obligation funds that raised over $2.5 billion. Tilton and Patriarch deny wrongdoing, and have said their investment strategy was consistently disclosed. Should the court not intervene, Tilton faces trial on Oct. 13.