Skip to main content

%1

Sears Proposal to Raise Adviser Fees Rejected by Bankruptcy Judge

Submitted by jhartgen@abi.org on

A bankruptcy judge overseeing Sears Holdings Corp.’s case rejected the company’s request to increase compensation for three advisers hired to recover money by filing lawsuits against the retailer’s vendors and other parties, WSJ Pro Bankruptcy reported. Judge Robert Drain of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in White Plains, N.Y., said that he needs to see more information on why Sears needs to raise the advisers’ contingency fees to pursue claims against any third parties who received payment from Sears within three months before its bankruptcy filing. Sears hired law firms ASK LLP and Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP and financial adviser Stretto to pursue so-called preference lawsuits. While such lawsuits typically play a minor role in obtaining recoveries for creditors, they have become a critical avenue to potentially collect money in the Sears case, because the Sears bankruptcy case remains open more than two years after all of its stores and operations were sold, and more than a year after Judge Drain confirmed its restructuring plan, because there wasn’t enough money left to pay top-ranking creditors—including suppliers who sold merchandise to the retailer during the bankruptcy case.

Purdue Bankruptcy Judge OKs Law Firms’ Deal Giving Up $1M in Fees

Submitted by ckanon@abi.org on
The judge overseeing Purdue Pharma’s bankruptcy approved a deal yesterday under which three law firms will forfeit a combined $1 million in fees to resolve allegations that they failed to disclose connections to Sackler family members that own the company, Reuters reported. During a virtual hearing, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Robert Drain in White Plains, N.Y., signed off on the deal between the U.S. Trustee’s office and Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, and Dechert. There were no objections to the settlement, which was announced in April. Under the deal, the firms will reduce their fee applications for their legal services to Purdue by a total of $1 million. Purdue filed for bankruptcy protection in September 2019 in an effort to resolve about 3,000 lawsuits accusing it of fueling the national opioid crisis through deceptive marketing. It has proposed a settlement that it says is worth more than $10 billion to set up trusts that would distribute funds to states, local governments and other organizations for opioid abatement programs. The Sackler family members who own the company have agreed to contribute $4.3 billion to the deal, paid out over nine years. The U.S. Trustee accused the three firms of failing to comply with bankruptcy disclosure requirements when they were hired by Purdue by failing to disclose “joint interest agreements” with Sackler family members. The agreements required the law firms, representing Purdue in pre-bankruptcy opioid-related litigation, to keep information shared between Purdue and Sackler family members confidential. All three firms have said they do not believe they were required to make the disclosures under bankruptcy law.

Purdue Law Firms to Waive $1 Million in Fees over Sackler Defense Disclosures

Submitted by ckanon@abi.org on
Law firms representing Purdue Pharma LP in litigation and investigations around its OxyContin painkiller have agreed with the Justice Department to forgo a combined $1 million in fees over their failure to disclose a deal their attorneys signed between the drugmaker and its Sackler family owners, WSJ Pro reported. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, WilmerHale and Dechert LLP agreed to waive the fees and update their disclosure to include other connections, should any exist, to other parties linked to Purdue’s ongoing chapter 11 case, according to a settlement filed in bankruptcy court on Thursday between the firms and Justice Department officials. The settlement follows a Wall Street Journal report in February about Skadden and WilmerHale not disclosing a joint defense agreement between the company and members of the Sackler family when the firms applied to be retained by Purdue after its 2019 bankruptcy filing. “These disclosure violations are particularly concerning because a central question in these cases has been the independence of Purdue from the Sackler families,” said Cliff White, director of the U.S. Trustee Program. Skadden, WilmerHale and Dechert said in the court filing that they don’t believe they needed to disclose the defense agreement in their retention applications, but “have agreed to resolve the matter in the interest of expediency.” Click here to view the settlement.