Skip to main content
ABI Journal

Professional Compensation/Fees

Judge Ambro Explains the Primacy of Section 327(a) over State Ethics Rules

Absent an ‘actual conflict,’ disqualification is not automatic, the Third Circuit says.

Bankruptcy Courts in Colorado and Minnesota Bar Bifurcated Fee Arrangements

Local rules require lawyers to prepare and fill all required chapter 7 papers regardless of whether the debtor pays the fee or agrees to pay the fee.

In Reciprocity States, the Court Must Rule on Contract Issues to Shift Fees, Circuit Says

Even if a dischargeability suit is based on a contract, the winner is not entitled to fee-shifting if the court rules on noncontract issues.

Tuesday, May 24, 2022
Please note that in order to view the content for the Bankruptcy Headlines please log in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Second Circuit Allows Appellate Attorneys’ Fees for Upholding a Contempt Citation

Finally, a circuit court cites Taggart to help a debtor enforce the discharge injunction.

Tuesday, May 17, 2022
Please note that in order to view the content for the Bankruptcy Headlines please log in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Denial of Receipt by Itself Won’t Defeat the ‘Mailbox Presumption,’ District Judge Says

Special counsel unfamiliar with bankruptcy procedures weren’t excused from the requirement to file a final fee application by the deadline.

How and Why We Avoid Conflicts of Interest: The Relevance of Conflict Checks in Turnaround Work

From its inception, the National Ethics Task Force [1] was charged with answering the question of whether there is a need for national ethics rules, standards and general practice guidance in the bankruptcy context.

Uncommon and Controversial, Are Post-Petition Retainers Authorized Under the Bankruptcy Code?

Bankruptcy courts have not always favored post-petition retainers to debtor’s counsel. [1] But does the Bankruptcy Code prohibit them? That is exactly the question Judge David D. Cleary answered in In re Golden Fleece Beverages Inc., in which he held that the Code indeed supports post-petition retainers. [2]