Case Against Weinstein Encounters Challenges
Just five months ago, disgraced Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein was escorted in handcuffs past a phalanx of reporters and photographers and into the Manhattan Criminal Courts Building where a grand jury had voted to indict him, setting the stage for arguably the most important prosecution of the #MeToo era. But now the case against Weinstein appears to be fraying, the New York Times reported. A detective failed to turn over important evidence to prosecutors. A judge dismissed part of the indictment. Evidence has emerged undermining the allegation of one of the accusers. In addition, assistants of Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance Jr., thought that once they filed charges, a flood of new complaints might lead to more victims being added to the case. It has not worked out that way. Prosecutors maintain they are still interviewing potential victims, and that the evidence remains strong enough to win a conviction, even with just two women to testify against Weinstein. “We are moving full speed ahead,” the lead prosecutor on the case, Joan Illuzzi, said in court. But Mr. Weinstein’s lawyer, Benjamin Brafman, has argued that the entire indictment was contaminated because prosecutors failed to show the grand jury evidence favorable to his client. So far, Justice James Burke has only dismissed one charge related to Lucia Evans, a marketing executive.
