Stores that Stocked Up on Debt Face a Harsh Holiday Reckoning
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
The judge overseeing PG&E Corp.’s bankruptcy has rejected efforts to slow down voting on a proposed $13.5 billion settlement for wildfire victims as negotiations over certain terms continue, WSJ Pro Bankruptcy reported. Bankruptcy Judge Dennis Montali of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in San Francisco said that he won’t order the dissemination of a supplemental disclosure that urges wildfire victims to withhold votes until at least the end of the month on PG&E’s chapter 11 exit proposal. The ruling marks a setback for an official committee of wildfire victims that has been trying to stop the exit proposal from accumulating support among the roughly 70,000 individuals and businesses who filed claims against PG&E over wildfires linked to its equipment. If fewer than two-thirds of those creditors vote to back the proposal, it would create a serious hurdle for the company in its bid to exit chapter 11 by a state-imposed June 30 deadline. PG&E would have to either reopen negotiations with wildfire victims or ask Judge Montali to approve the proposal without their support, which he has signaled that he is unlikely to do.
The judge presiding over the massive PG&E Corp. bankruptcy on Tuesday declined to sanction an attempt to halt wildfire victims’ voting on the company’s restructuring plan, a setback for a group of lawyers that has tried to force changes to a crucial $13.5 billion settlement deal, the San Francisco Chronicle reported. Bankruptcy Judge Dennis Montali said in a written order that he would not approve a letter from a creditor committee of fire victims that would ask tens of thousands of people to delay casting a vote on PG&E’s plan to resolve the case. His decision came one day after attorneys for the committee asked for permission to send the letter, which was intended to get PG&E to provide stronger assurances about how fire victims will be paid for their losses. “Hundreds, if not thousands” of victims have voted already, Judge Montali wrote. “The (committee) apparently does not want to upset those votes, but it is beyond doubt that confusion will reign if the court permits the proposed letter to go out, leaving countless fire victims confused even more than they might be now.” About 80,000 victims are able to vote for or against PG&E’s plan until May 15. The committee wanted them to wait a few weeks in large part because the economic turmoil caused by the coronavirus pandemic prompted concern that PG&E may not actually be able to provide the full $13.5 billion after the case concludes.
Mallinckrodt PLC said yesterday that an agreement to refinance a large chunk of its $5.4 billion debt load has fallen apart, and the drugmaker has instead struck a deal for a more limited bond exchange, WSJ Pro Bankruptcy reported. Mallinckrodt said yesterday that the previous deal, which would have refinanced over $1.2 billion of its near-maturing debt, has been terminated. The pact was premised upon the pharmaceutical giant being able to raise a new term loan, but the deterioration of financial markets as a result of the coronavirus pandemic made it difficult for Mallinckrodt to obtain the new financing. Instead, the company has entered into a new exchange agreement with bondholders Aurelius Capital Master Ltd., Franklin Advisers Inc., Capital Research and Management Co. and Columbus Hill Capital Management LP to exchange $495 million of bonds maturing on April 15 for a new first lien senior secured note due 2025, Mallinckrodt said Tuesday. The remaining $120 million balance on the bonds due next week will presumably be paid out from cash from the company’s balance sheet.
A group of attorneys for victims of wildfires caused by PG&E Corp. have indicated they won’t support its plan to exit bankruptcy anymore unless the company can guarantee that it will actually fund the full $13.5 billion it has promised to pay their clients, the San Francisco Chronicle reported. The lawyers want their clients to hold off on voting for PG&E’s bankruptcy plan until next month, by which point they hope to have secured a better deal with the company. Fire victims and their lawyers have been increasingly vocal about their dissatisfaction with a $13.5 billion settlement that would pay their claims because they no longer trust that PG&E will provide the full dollar amount. So the creditor committee of victims in the company’s bankruptcy case is trying to get PG&E to improve the arrangement by April 28. The committee yesterday asked U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Dennis Montali to let the group send a letter to victims urging them not to vote on the exit plan until after they send a follow-up report on May 1 detailing whether the company improved the settlement deal. All creditors have until May 15 to vote on the plan.
Lawyers for more than half the wildfire victims who negotiated a $13.5 billion settlement with PG&E Corp. say their clients plan to vote overwhelmingly in favor of the bankrupt utility’s reorganization plan, Bloomberg News reported. The attorneys represent about 40,300 of the estimated 70,000 who lost homes, businesses and other property in blazes blamed on PG&E equipment. Members of the largest group, represented by the firm Watts Guerra LLP, have voted nearly unanimously in favor of the deal, with more than half of 18,000 total votes already cast. The vast majority of the second largest group, represented by the Singleton Law Firm, also solidly back the plan, although most haven’t voted yet, a senior partner said. “So far, the response has been overwhelming,” said the partner, Gerald Singleton, whose firm represents roughly 7,000 victims. The preliminary tallies come as attorneys for a committee representing fire victims in the bankruptcy have asked a federal judge to modify the settlement because half of the payout will be funded with stock that’s been battered by the coronavirus fallout. PG&E’s chapter 11 plan must win support from two thirds of wildfire victims who cast a ballot. Voting began this week and concludes May 15.
The Buffalo (N.Y.) Diocese is advising its 161 Catholic parishes to hire bankruptcy attorneys from Idaho and Rochester to represent them collectively, as the diocese moves ahead with chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings, the Buffalo News reported. More than 250 Child Victims Act lawsuits against the diocese were put on hold in the state court system as a result of the diocese’s filing in federal bankruptcy court in February. But at least 80 parishes across Western New York have been named as defendants alongside the diocese, and because the parishes are separately incorporated legal entities, they are not part of the diocese’s chapter 11 filing and the lawsuits against them are continuing in state courts. Until now, the parishes for the most part have relied heavily on the diocese for legal help, including having diocese-hired lawyers prepare the legal paperwork answering Child Victims Act complaints. But diocese officials have strongly recommended that the parishes band together and retain their own attorney to represent them going forward, as has been done in the Rochester Diocese bankruptcy case. Parish pastors, trustees and finance councils were being asked to consider hiring J. Ford Elsaesser, a bankruptcy expert in Idaho who has been involved with at least six other diocese bankruptcies, and Timothy P. Lyster of Woods Oviatt Gilman in Rochester. Lyster also represents the Rochester Ad Hoc Parish Committee in the Rochester Diocese bankruptcy.
If the past is any guide, the government funds being used to help businesses during this downturn will surely produce False Claims Act investigations and litigation, according to a commentary in the National Law Journal. In the five years after 2009, when Congress passed stimulus bills to respond to the financial crisis, the government and private whistleblowers filed nearly 4,000 FCA cases and recovered almost $23 billion. On March 27, President Donald Trump signed the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, which provides $2 trillion in federal funds to fight the ongoing health and economic crisis caused by COVID-19. The CARES Act is the largest economic stimulus package in U.S. history, more than twice as large as the measures passed in 2009. It provides $349 billion in loans for small businesses, $130 billion in relief for hospitals and medical suppliers, and $500 billion in assistance to other businesses, states, and municipalities. Many companies desperately need the funds the CARES Act offers, but they should carefully ensure that they meet the eligibility requirements, according to the commentary. Any person or business that recklessly submits a material false statement in connection with a claim for funds could wind up as the target of an FCA investigation.
Driven partly by a legal reformist spirit and entrepreneurial zeal, some lawyers are testing a new weapon in arbitration: sheer volume, according to a New York Times analysis. And as companies face a flood of claims, they are employing new strategies to thwart the very process that they have upheld as the optimal way to resolve disputes. Companies, in a few instances, have refused to the pay fees required to start the arbitration process, hoping that would short-circuit the cases. “There is no way that the system can handle mass arbitrations,” said Cliff Palefsky, a San Francisco employment lawyer who has worked to develop fairness standards for arbitration. “The companies are trying to weasel their way out of the system that they created.” Even as Supreme Court rulings over the last two decades have enshrined arbitration as the primary way that companies can hash out disputes, giving them enormous sway, consumer advocates and labor rights groups have criticized its inequities. One of the biggest obstacles for consumers and workers is that payouts on individual arbitration judgments don’t justify the costs of mounting a complex case against a big company. Teel Lidow runs FairShake, a start-up that uses an automated system to get the arbitration process started. If the claim results in a payout, the start-up takes a cut. Lidow got interested in arbitration after the e-commerce company he founded to sell ethically sourced clothing shut down. A former mergers and acquisitions lawyer, he wanted to use some of his digital know-how to disrupt the legal system that nearly every American must agree to use instead of going to court against their employer, rental car provider or cable company.