Medical Staffing Co. Says "Surprise Billing" Ban Hastened Bankruptcy
American Physician Partners, which until recently provided outsourced emergency room services to 150 U.S. hospitals, said Thursday that a ban on so-called "surprise" medical bills hastened the company's descent into bankruptcy, Reuters reported. The company's chief restructuring officer John DiDonato said at a Thursday bankruptcy court hearing in Wilmington, Delaware, that the 2020 No Surprises Act hampered the company's ability to raise revenue and recover from the long-term impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. The law was passed to protect patients from surprise billing for care from providers outside their insurers' network. Insurers pay a much lower share of the cost of out-of-network providers than in-network providers. Before the No Surprises Act, providers typically billed patients for the balance of the cost. DiDonato on Thursday said although the law was motivated by a "sound" policy goal, it has unexpectedly worsened negotiations between healthcare providers and insurers who "unilaterally" refuse or delay payment for medical care. The private equity-backed company, which once employed 2,500 physicians, filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy on Monday after transitioning all of its medical services to new contractors and winding down operations. It has more than $570 million in debt. "The No Surprises Act had the unintended consequence of shifting the balance of power toward insurers," DiDonato told U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Brendan Shannon. "Surprise" billing had been particularly prevalent for emergency department visits, when patients would visit a hospital that was part of their insurance network but later receive a bill for out-of-network care from doctors who are not part of the same insurance network as the hospital. About 70% of emergency departments in the U.S. are outsourced, according to American Physician Partners' court filings. The company said that it did not bill patients for costs not covered by insurance. But the regulations implementing the ban have encouraged insurers to unilaterally reduce or deny payments, funneling cost disputes into a slow and ineffective "independent dispute resolution" process, according to the company's court filings.
