In 2024, as corporate bankruptcies surge in the US, an increasing number of companies are entering bankruptcy with existing litigation assets in addition to avoidance and other claims that arise post-filing. Debtors and creditors should not overlook a tool to generate incremental value for bankruptcy estates: Selling or substantially monetizing large litigations—valuable collateral that has historically been overlooked as a source of incremental value for a debtor.
In this session we will outline some real-life case studies which illustrate the value of legal finance for recovering value for bankruptcy estates.
MagCorp: A mining firm had been involved in a long-standing lawsuit against its former holding company, accusing them of driving them into bankruptcy. After winning a $213 million judgment, MagCorp's bankruptcy trustee faced a shortage of funds to continue pursuing the case. To address this cash flow issue, the trustee and their attorney organized a groundbreaking public auction to sell an interest in the right to receive litigation recoveries from the $213 million judgment on appeal. The sale, which amounted to $26.2 million, allowed the estate to liquidate a portion of its contingent asset, mitigate the risk of the appeal, and ensure a minimum recovery for MagCorp's creditors.
Maines: A large food service distributor filed for voluntary bankruptcy following increased business pressures due to Covid-19 restaurant closures and was acquired by another company. The main assets in the estate were a portfolio of various food antitrust claims that would be hard for the company to pursue due to a lack of personnel and time constraints. The appointed trustees were able to distribute the cash proceeds from the sale of the litigation assets directly to creditors—generating liquidity that they would otherwise not have been able to access and delivering an accelerated and guaranteed financial result ahead of case resolution.
Cox Operating LLC: The recent 363 auction process run by the debtor and its advisor Moelis & Company in the In re: MLCJR LLC Chapter 11 bankruptcy for MLCJR’s subsidiary Cox Operating LLC’s pre-filing litigation claim generated substantial incremental liquidity for the debtor from a litigation claim that in the past may have been overlooked as an independent source of value.
Making various parties of interests to a particular bankruptcy aware of their optionality around unlocking the value of litigation assets through monetization or sale of those assets.
Other
Suggested Speakers
Emily
Slater
eslater@burfordcapital.com
Connor
Murphy
cmurphy@burfordcapital.com
Kelly
Daley
Kdaley@burfordcapital.com
Charlie
Griffin
cgriffin@burfordcapital.com
Christina
Madden
cmadden@burfordcapital.com
Burford Capital
The ethical issues involving Judge David Jones in Texas are in the news all over the world. What lessons to we learn? What obligations do professionals -- both practitioners and judges have to question "connections"? How do we protect our industry which is built on transparency, notice and fairness? What happens when we fail to protect it? Does the public shrug their shoulders and figure that none of it is fair and only the powerful benefit? The mistrust hurts us all and especially in a court system that sees more businesses and individuals than any other. Are we destroying ourselves by regarding this as more of a game and forgetting that this is a profession that is built on trust?
What should professionals and judges consider for disclosure of "connections"?
How do we determine what should be disclosed?
How do we live within our ethical obligations while providing the best representation of our clients?
Business
Lenders face a fundamental problem in life: the math, from the onset, favors the borrower. This is nowhere better displayed than in real estate transactions, where most debt is non-recourse and secured at the property level. Much legal work in a real estate transaction can be viewed as an effort to make up for and possibly invert the inherent disadvantages of the lender. This session aims to provide an intuitive, practical understanding of the role of option theory in structuring and valuing the positions of borrowers and lenders.
Be able to look at any situation and better assess the value of embedded optionality. See value or costs where you didn't see them before. Capture more value for your clients. Be able to draw option diagrams on cocktail napkins at networking events.
Debtor
Suggested Speakers
Israel
Shaked
ishaked@michel-shaked.com
Ken
Miller
kmiller@advisorsguardian.com
Guardian Advisors
For many practitioners, courtroom matters often become more routine recitations of settlements or agreed isolated issues to be argued. Likely all practitioners would appreciate a "tune up" on getting through a hotly contested case. Topics might include: pretrial motions (when and how to make); discovery right/procedures/objections; review of burden of proof and burden shifting rules; advice on presenting evidence by witness & common objections; how to get "in the record" the evidence you need - appraisals, valuation, lien position, payments, etc; Expert witness rules.
Other
David
Cox
david@coxlawgroup.com
Cox Law Group
Debtor estates and other distressed stakeholders can monetize formerly contaminated parcels which have no higher or better use than solar by leasing or selling those assets to specialized brownfields-to-solar developers. These niche developers can buy suitable parcels outright or offer twenty-year leases which can be transferred with the property. The Inflation Reduction Act and renewable energy-friendly states provide significant financial incentives which allow for generous lease rates. Bankruptcy trustees, debtor estates, creditors and other stakeholders have begun exploring this monetization strategy, which can be accomplished out of court, as long as the assets are at least partially remediated.
What is the brownfields solar financial model, whether through lease or acquisition, and how much revenue would it generate in a sample project?
What types of real estate assets are suitable for solar siting (and no other, higher/better uses)?
What geographical locations/states provide the best financial incentives (tax incentives, rec programs, high power rates) to generate the highest lease rate or purchase price for a trustee, debtor estate or other stakeholder?
What are the relevant provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act?
What are some of the relevant provisions in states with favorable policies?
How can a trustee, debtor estate or other stakeholder mitigate the environmental risk associated with brownfields solar projects?
How can public sector creditors properly dispose of or monetize through lease brownfield properties where the property owner is missing or refuses to appear in court proceedings?
Can environmental liabilities be discharged under section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code? Is that necessary in the context of developing solar on brownfields?
Debtor
Suggested Speakers
creation of special “Chapter 11 districts” and the Texas Two-Step
Other
Denise
Barnett
Denise_Barnett@tnwb.uscourts.gov
United States Bankruptcy Judge Western District of Tennessee (Memphis)
(regardless of what the Supreme Court concludes)
Other
Denise
Barnett
Denise_Barnett@tnwb.uscourts.gov
United States Bankruptcy Judge Western District of Tennessee (Memphis)
9th and 10th Circuits have one view, the is another view developing the 2nd Circuit, and the 6th Circuit have some cases being worked through the system.
Other
Denise
Barnett
Denise_Barnett@tnwb.uscourts.gov
United States Bankruptcy Judge Western District of Tennessee (Memphis)
how this technology may aid in various aspect of the bankruptcy practice (consumer, business, sales, cases with large number of claims, etc.) and ethical concerns.
Other
Denise
Barnett
Denise_Barnett@tnwb.uscourts.gov
United States Bankruptcy Judge Western District of Tennessee (Memphis)