Boy Scouts of America Asks Supreme Court to Allow Sex-Abuse Settlement to Advance
The Boy Scouts of America asked the U.S. Supreme Court to reject a plea by some sex-abuse victims to put on hold a $2.4 billion settlement that allowed the youth organization to exit bankruptcy last year, WSJ Pro Bankruptcy reported. In a response filed late Thursday, lawyers for the Boy Scouts said that putting a stop to the distribution of funds to abuse victims that got under way last year would be unfair to the more than 99% of survivors who are not seeking to stay the Boy Scouts’ chapter 11 plan. A fraction of more than 82,000 survivors who filed sex-abuse claims against the organization asked the Supreme Court in recent weeks to suspend settlement payments while the court reviews a challenge to opioid maker Purdue Pharma’s bankruptcy plan. Lawyers pushing to pause the Boy Scouts settlement payments argued that a central feature of the Boy Scouts deal is similar to Purdue Pharma’s chapter 11 plan that is under an expedited review in the U.S. Supreme Court. Both restructuring plans would grant legal immunity to third parties who themselves didn’t file for bankruptcy but have close ties to the organizations. The Purdue settlement releases the company’s Sackler family owners from future liabilities related to opioid addiction in return for payments of up to $6 billion over time. Similarly, the Boy Scouts settlement shields the youth organization’s local councils and its partner organizations, which sponsor most scouting activities, from future sex-abuse claims.
