Supreme Court has three bankruptcy cases this term, on nonjudicial foreclosure, trademark rejection, and contempt for a stay violation.
High court will resolve a circuit split dating back to the Fourth Circuit’s controversial Lubrizol opinion in 1985.
Circuit splits over trademarks and the automatic stay are contenders for resolution in the Supreme Court.
Already primed to rule on nonjudicial foreclosure, the Supreme Court might take cases involving contempt, the automatic stay and trademarks.
Petitioner contends the Second Circuit was wrong to bar arbitration in view of the Supreme Court’s decision in Epic Systems.
What did Congress mean in Sections 365(n) and 101(35A)? Is the right to use a trademark terminated when a trademark license is rejected?
High court resolves a circuit split on Section 523(a)(2)(B) and the meaning of “financial condition.”
Circuit splits persist because the Supreme Court ducks fraudulent transfer cases.
The high court seemed primed to rule that a debt will be discharged despite an oral misrepresentation about one asset.
Following a suggestion made by two Supreme Court justices, Tribune creditors ask the Second Circuit to recall the mandate and remand for reconsideration in district court.
