Skip to main content
ABI Journal

3rd Circuit

Marrying an Adversary Doesn’t Mean Disqualification, Third Circuit Says

Following the Model Rules and erecting ethical screens allows adversary lawyers to date and marry.

Collateral Estoppel Can Bar Use of Federal Rule 45 to Quash a Subpoena, Circuit Says

Third Circuit says: You can object to a Rule 2004 discovery motion or move to quash a subpoena under Federal Rule 45, but not both.

Bankruptcy Courts Always Have Post-Confirmation Jurisdiction for ‘Core’ Matters

The Third Circuit opinion by Thomas Ambro explained that the ‘close nexus’ test does not apply when a post-conformation dispute is ‘core’ or entails enforcing a court order.

A ‘Notwithstanding’ Clause May Not Control a Specific Provision, District Judge Says

An appeal to the Third Circuit may tell us whether a ‘notwithstanding any other provision’ clause really means what it says.

Third Circuit Sets the Standard for Qualification of a Future Claimants’ Representative

A representative of future claimants must meet a higher standard than disinterestedness, the Third Circuit said, but technical conflicts may not be disqualifying.

Delaware Judge Approves ‘Uptier’ Financing that Involuntarily Subordinated Debt

Bankruptcy Judge Craig T. Goldblatt declined to interpret an indenture’s ratable treatment clause as anti-subordination in disguise.

Delaware Supreme Court: No ‘Insolvency Exception’ for Asset Sales

Delaware corporations must have shareholder approval to sell all or substantially all assets outside of bankruptcy.

Judge Walrath Describes Due Diligence to Plead After the Amendment to Section 547(b)

The amendment to Section 547(b) does not require a preference complaint to explain why the defendant doesn’t have affirmative defenses, Judge Walrath says.

Judge Ambro Explains the Primacy of Section 327(a) over State Ethics Rules

Absent an ‘actual conflict,’ disqualification is not automatic, the Third Circuit says.

Two Circuits Now Give Priority Status to Obamacare’s Individual Mandate Penalty

The Affordable Care Act’s ‘individual mandate’ was a tax measured by income, thus giving the IRS a priority tax claim.