Skip to main content

%1

Imputation of Fraudulent Intent to Legal Entities: Can One Bad Apple Spoil the Barrel?

How do you show that a legal entity acted with intent to defraud its creditors for purposes of an avoidance action asserted under Bankruptcy Code § 548(a)(1)(A)? After all, legal entities themselves cannot form an intent; they can only act through their officers, directors or agents. In an action to avoid a fraudulent transfer, courts determine the transferring legal entity’s intent by imputing the intent of its agents to the legal entity.

Landlord and Tenant Clashes in Subchapter V: Unexpired Lease Obligations Affecting Eligibility to Elect Subchapter V Treatment

Since its inception, subchapter V of chapter 11 has been lauded for providing a streamlined path through chapter 11 for smaller chapter 11 debtors without many of the costs associated with “traditional” chapter 11 cases. But before a debtor can elect subchapter V treatment and take advantage of these benefits, the debtor must have less than $7.5 million in total noncontingent, liquidated debts (both secured and unsecured).

Crypto Chaos: Infinite Wealth, Digital Hype and Economic Realities

In the realm of digital finance, economics and behavior, a peculiar phenomenon has emerged — one that stirs emotions, challenges conventions, and sometimes leaves us questioning the sanity of it all. For far too long, it seems, emperors with no clothes have danced their deceptive jig before a diverse audience, from seasoned investors to hopeful novices.

FRBP 9006 Doesn’t Take Vacations: How to Appropriately Calculate Deadlines Under the Bankruptcy Rules

When a deadline falls on a weekend or a holiday, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6 (and its analogues Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9006 and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 26) does not apply if the deadline is not calculated. In other words, if the court order states the deadline as a specific date, that date is the deadline, and it does not matter if it falls on a holiday. This is confirmed by the advisory committee’s note to the 2009 amendment: “The time-computation provisions of subdivision (a) apply only when a time period must be computed.

1111(b) Wizardry

This panel will discuss the § 1111(b) election in modern times. It’s not the rule against perpetuities, but it’s also not as simple as your basic loan default. Do you know how to analyze whether making the election makes sense? Perhaps more importantly, do you know how to counsel your client through the process?