Skip to main content

%1

The Interplay Between Sections 363 and 365: Trap for the Unwary Lessee, Tool for the Trustee, or Both?

A recent opinion issued by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Pinnacle Restaurant at Big Sky LLC v. CH SP Acquisitions LLC( In re Spanish Peaks Holdings II LLC)[1] affirmed a holding that would allow, under certain circumstances, the sale of commercial real estate in a bankruptcy case to be free and clear of all liens, claims and encumbrances, including leasehold interests that are generally protected under § 365(h) of the Bankruptcy Code.

In re Delaware Sports Complex LLC

Three men had a vision to develop a sports complex in Middleton, Del. They formed a limited liability company called, fittingly, Delaware Sports Complex LLC (hereinafter “DSC”)[1].

DSC was eager to develop its 170-acre sports complex — perhaps too eager, because it entered into a lease one (1) year before the LLC had been legally created. However, the lease contained a term wherein DSC represented and warranted that it was a duly formed and created Delaware LLC.

Bona Fide Purchaser vs. Subsequent Lienholder: A Distinction with a Difference (in Ohio)

In the recent case of In re Oakes,[1] the chapter 7 trustee filed an adversary complaint seeking to avoid PNC Mortgage Company’s mortgage on real property owned by the debtors because of a defective acknowledgment of the debtors’ signatures. No one denied that the mortgage was defective or that there was precedent to avoid a mortgage containing a “blank” acknowledgment clause under § 544(a) and Ohio law, but PNC sought to dismiss the avoidance action based on the newly enacted Ohio Rev.

GGI Distinguishes BPF PDQ

When the U.S. Supreme Court decided BFP v. Resolution Trust Corp.,[1] holding that a mortgage foreclosure sale regularly conducted pursuant to state law could not be avoided as a fraudulent transfer under 11 U.S.C. § 548, it expressly left open the question of whether a tax foreclosure by the holder of a tax lien certificate could be avoided as a fraudulent transfer under that same statute.[2]

Ninth Circuit BAP Holds Recording of Tax Deed Not a Ministerial Act Excepted from the Automatic Stay

In In re RW Meridian LLC,[1] the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel considered whether the pre-petition expiration of the Debtor’s right of redemption for unpaid taxes permitted the tax authority to complete a tax sale post-petition without obtaining relief from the stay. The BAP held that the automatic stay applied, voiding the sale.

Bankruptcy Relief Is Unavailable to a SARE Debtor That Leases Space to a Marijuana-Related Business

The increasing relaxation of state laws regulating both the medical and recreational use of marijuana has led to a boom in marijuana-related businesses (“MRBs”). Because MRBs are not exempt from economic forces, however, courts are increasingly being confronted with bankruptcy filings by and against MRBs.