In In re Lane,( George Lane, et. Al v. Western Interstate Bancorp), 280 F.3d 663 (6th Cir. 2002), the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, following the direction of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Nobleman v. American Savings Bank, 508 U.S. 324, 113 S.Ct. 2106 (1993), held that §1322(b)(2), or what is commonly known as the anti-modification clause, did not protect an unsecured mortgage-holder from modification of its lien through the chapter 13 plan process.