Skip to main content

%1

Who Killed the Mass Torts Bonanza?

"You won't hear many tort reformers admit it. They've done too good a job demonizing trial lawyers to let their bogeymen fade away. Twenty years ago, tort reform was an obscure movement with a funny name; today, politicians speak of "ending lawsuit abuse" or "eliminating frivolous lawsuits" -- tort reform by more felicitous names -- whenever they need a failsafe applause line. The movement's success has been a public relations masterpiece." 

Inconsistent or Reconcilable?: The Mixed Blessings of Circuit Splits: CIRCUIT SPLITS CHOICE OF LAW DETERMINATIONS IN BANKRUPTCY COURT

"Bankruptcy courts often address causes of action and claims arising under or governed by state law. Often presented is the question of which state’s laws to apply. To be discussed here is the further question raised: how does a bankruptcy court make a choice of law determination?

Institutional Response to Tort System Breakdown: Asbestos Enters a New Phase*

"Most observers are familiar with the old aphorism that “there is law and there is asbestos law”—the notion being that legal protections for defendants were stripped away over time by both Federal and state courts attempting to deal with asbestos litigation. A relatively benign interpretation is that courts had to find innovative ways to deal with overwhelming masses of claims and many of these innovations backfired inadvertently.

The Increasing Deployment of §363 Sales at the Inception of Chapter 11 and Issues of Collusion Related Thereto

The sale of a debtor's assets outside of a confirmed plan of reorganization is accomplished pursuant to §363(b) of the Bankruptcy Code. There has traditionally been tension within the courts when a proposed §363 sale involves the selling of all or substantially all of a debtor's assets, or a sale is proposed outside such debtor's ordinary course of business.