Based on the “natural breadth of the passive voice” used in Section 523(a)(2)(A), the Supreme Court held yesterday in a unanimous opinion by Justice Amy Coney Barrett that a partner who herself was innocent of fraud is nonetheless saddled with a nondischargeable debt resulting from the fraud of her partner. The opinion is a reaffirmation of the Court’s holding in Strang v. Bradner, 114 U.S. 555 (1885). In a concurring opinion, Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson endeavored to limit the scope of the holding by saying that they understood the outcome to be based on the existence of a partnership under state law. Read the full column.
