Textualism, Originalism and the Code: Arguments for a Heretical View of § 363

Citizens to Preserve Overton Park Inc. v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402 (1971); Cent. Va. Cmty. College v. Katz, 546 U.S. 356 (2006); Lamar, Archer & Cofrin LLP v. Appling, 138 S. Ct. 1752 (2018); Grupo Mexicano De Desarrollo v. Alliance Bond Fund, 527 U.S. 308 (1999); Taggart v. Lorenzen, 139 S. Ct. 1795, 1801 (2019); Ind. State Police Pension Trust v. Chrysler LLC (In re Chrysler LLC), 576 F.3d 108 (2nd Cir. 2009); In re Lionel Corp., 722 F.2d 1063, 1067-68 (2nd Cir. 1983); N.Y. v. Nat'l Serv. Indus. Inc., 460 F.3d 201 (2d Cir. 2006); In re Mooney Aircraft Inc., 730 F.2d 367 (5th Cir. 1984); In re Leckie Smokeless Coal Co., 99 F.3d 573 (4th Cir. 1996); In re TWA, 322 F.3d 283 (3rd Cir. 2003); Morgan Olson LLC v. Frederico (In re Grumman Olson Indus.), 445 B.R. 243 (S.D. N.Y. 2011); Mission Prod. Holdings v. Tempnology LLC, 139 S. Ct. 1652 (2019); NLRB v. Bildisco & Bildisco, 465 U.S. 513, 532 (1984); Abboud v. Ground Round Inc. 482 F.3d 15, 18 (1st Cir. 2007).