Skip to main content

Back to the Future? Critical-Vendor Orders Cannot Be Applied Retroactively to Shield Preference Liability

Journal Issue
Column Name
Citation
Joseph L. Steinfeld, Jr., Gary D. Underdahl and Bethany J. Rubis, Back to the Future? Critical-Vendor Orders Cannot Be Applied Retroactively to Shield Preference Liability, XXXVII ABI Journal 11, 30-31, 50, November 2018
Cases Discussed
Devices Liquidation Trust v. KMT Wireless LLC (In re Pers. Commc'ns Devices LLC), No. 8-13-74303-AST, 2018 WL 3968201 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Aug. 17, 2018); Osborn v. Howell Electric (In re Fultonville Metal Prod. Co.), 330 B.R. 305 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2005); Zenith Indus. Corp. v. Longwood Elastomers Inc. (In re Zenith Indus. Corp.), 319 B.R. 810 (Bankr. D. Del. 2005); Phoenix Rest. Grp. Inc. v. Proficient Food Co. (In re Phoenix Rest. Grp. Inc.), No. 301-12036, 2004 WL 3113719 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. Dec. 16, 2004), aff'd, 373 B.R. 541 (M.D. Tenn. 2007); AFA Inv. Inc. v. Trade Source Inc. (In re AFA Inv. Inc.), 538 B.R. 237 (Bankr. D. Del. 2015); HLI Creditor Trust v. Export Corp. (In re Hayes Lemmerz Int'l Inc.), 313 B.R. 189 (Bankr. D. Del. 2004).
Journal Date
Bankruptcy Rule

Please sign in to access Journal articles or click here to join ABI.