Is the Concept of Nationwide Service of Process in Jeopardy?

Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. and United States, 458 U.S. 50 (1982); Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 714 (1877); Int'l Shoe Co., v. State of Washington Office of Unemployment Compensation and Placement et al., 326 U.S. 310 (1945); Warfield v. K.R. Entertainment Inc. (In re Federal Fountain Inc.), 165 F.3d 600 (8th Cir. 1999); Diamond Mortg. Corp. of Illinois v. Sugar, 913 F. 2d 1233 (7th Cir. 1990), cert. den., 498 U.S. 1089 (1991); Busch v. Buchman, 11 F.3d 1255 (5th Cir. 1994); Goodyear Dunlop Tires v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915 (2011); J. McIntyre Machinery Ltd. v. Nicastro, 564 U.S. 873 (2013); Helicopteros Nacionales de Columbia, S.A. v. Hall, 466 U.S. 408 (1984); Asahi Metal v. Superior Court of California, 480 U.S. 102 (1987); Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462 (1985); Daimler v. Bauman, 134 S. Ct. 746 (2014); BNSF Railway v. Tyrell, 137 S. Ct. 1549 (2017); Bristol-Myers Squibb v. Superior Court of California, 137 S. Ct. 1773 (2017); Omni Capital, 484 U.S. 97, 102 (1987); Rubin v. Eurofinance SA [2012], U.K. S.C. 46.