Skip to main content

Is Possession a Requirement for Turnover

Journal Issue
Column Name
Citation
Richard E. Mikels and Ella Shenhav, Is Possession a Requirement for Turnover?, XXXII ABI Journal 3, 34-35, 67, April 2013
Bankruptcy Code
Cases Discussed
Newman v. Schwartzer (In re Newman), BAP No. NV-12-1439-JuKiD (9th Cir. B.A.P. Feb. 4, 2013); Rynda v. Thompson (In re Rynda), 2012 Bankr. LEXIS 688 (9th Cir. B.A.P. Jan. 30, 2012) ; Bailey v. Suhar (In re Bailey), 380 B.R. 486 (6th Cir. B.A.P. 2008) ; Jubber v. Ruiz (In re Ruiz), 455 B.R. 745, 742 (10th Cir. 2011); Beaman v. Vandeventer Black, LLP (In re Shearin), 224 F.3d 353 (4th Cir. 2000) ; Boyer v. Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emanuel, Smith 7 Cutler, P.A. (In re USA Diversified Products, Inc.), 100 F.3d 53 (7th Cir. 1996); Brown v. Pyatt (In re Pyatt), 486 F.3d 423 (8th Cir. 2007); Maggio v. Zeitz, 333 U.S. 56 (1948); In re Henson, 448 B.R. 109 (D. Nev. 2011)
Journal Date
Bankruptcy Rule

Please sign in to access Journal articles or click here to join ABI.