Skip to main content

Chapter 13 Disbursements in Fiscal Year 2001 Continued Growth and a New Finding

Journal Issue
Journal HTML Content

The 12 months ending Sept. 30, 2001 (FY 2001), were a period of continuing growth for activity in
chapter 13. Filings reached a new high at 374,133.<small><sup><a href="#2" name="2a">2</a></sup></small> Disbursements to creditors also continued to grow.
And as we have demonstrated previously, the pattern of disbursements displayed an interesting mix of
consistency and variability.<small><sup><a href="#3" name="3a">3</a></sup></small> Finally, we will report on a new finding on payment of post-petition
mortgage debt that arises from more detailed reporting by the standing chapter 13 trustees.

</p><h3>Total Disbursements</h3>

<p>Table 1 displays the total disbursements made by standing chapter 13 trustees during fiscal years
1998-2001. The amount for 2001 represents a 5 percent increase over year 2000 and a 12 percent increase
over year 1999.

</p><p></p><center><img src="/AM/images/journal/03febbbtnchart1.gif" alt="" align="middle" height="69" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="499"></center>

<h3>Disbursements to Secured, Priority and General Unsecured Creditors</h3>

<p>For the nation, disbursements made to the three major creditor groups during FY 2001 displayed the
proportions that by now have become expected: 57 percent to secured creditors, 7 percent to priority
creditors and 22 percent to general unsecured creditors.<small><sup><a href="#4" name="4a">4</a></sup></small> These percentages have remained remarkably stable
over the past dozen years. Over the past several years, however, there is evidence of the beginning of a trend
to return relatively more to general unsecured creditors and relatively less to priority creditors.

</p><h3>Geographical Variation</h3>

<p>During the previous three fiscal years, six states contributed approximately half of all returns to
creditors in chapter 13 (Tennessee, Texas, Georgia, California, Florida and Ohio). The same six states also
contributed 44 percent of the returns to general unsecured creditors during those years. In FY 2001, the 50
percent mark for disbursements to all creditors was crossed by the seventh state, Illinois (Table 2). Half of
all disbursements to general unsecured creditors were made in eight states, shown in Table 3. In that list,
Michigan joined the seven states already represented in Table 2. Tennessee continues to maintain its
position as a leader in chapter 13 disbursements, a fact made particularly noteworthy given its relatively
small population. Tennessee ranked 15th in population among the states in the 2000 census. The other
states listed in Tables 2 and 3 range from number 1 (California) to 10 (Georgia). In bankruptcy filings per
capita, however, Tennessee leads the nation.

</p><p></p><center><img src="/AM/images/journal/03febbbtnchart2.gif" alt="" align="middle" height="186" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="497"></center>

<p>At the other end of the distribution, 26 states contributed less than 1 percent each to the total disbursed
to all creditors.

</p><p></p><center><img src="/AM/images/journal/03febbbtnchart3.gif" alt="" align="middle" height="203" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="498"></center>

<h3>Analysis by Judicial District</h3>

<p>Although reporting results at the state level are convenient, they can sometimes be misleading. In
general, reporting by judicial district will give a truer picture of the extent of geographic variability.<small><sup><a href="#5" name="5a">5</a></sup></small> Table
4 shows the 20 districts that disbursed the most to all creditors beginning with the Western District of
Tennessee, which disbursed the most. Also shown in the table is the rank of each of these districts in
disbursements to unsecured creditors. Note first that for two states, Georgia and Tennessee, all of the
districts are in the group of top 20 disbursers. But for the other states shown in Tables 2 and 3, one or two
districts carry the bulk of the chapter 13 activity. There is not a one-to-one relationship to a district's rank
for all creditors and its rank for unsecured creditors. For example, Tennessee Western falls from first place in
total disbursements to seventh in disbursements to unsecured creditors.

</p><p></p><center><img src="/AM/images/journal/03febbbtnchart4.gif" alt="" align="middle" height="435" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="497"></center>

<h3>A Closer Look at Secured Debt Disbursements</h3>

<p>The annual reports of standing chapter 13 trustees to the Executive Office for U.S. Trustees include
separate categories, under secured debt, for post-petition mortgage payments (also called current or ongoing
mortgage payments) made through the plan as well as for mortgage arrearages. Table 5 shows how these
categories contribute to the total secured debt disbursed at the national level.<small><sup><a href="#6" name="6a">6</a></sup></small>

</p><p></p><center><img src="/AM/images/journal/03febbbtnchart5.gif" alt="" align="middle" height="102" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="499"></center>

<p>It may come as a surprise to see that the amount of post-petition mortgage debt disbursed by the
trustees within plans is approximately twice the amount of mortgage arrearages disbursed and more than 20
percent of all secured debt disbursed. As in many aspects of chapter 13 administration, the national number
represents a composite that only hints at the very interesting variation lying beneath the surface in the
practices of the judicial districts.

</p><p>Table 6 lists the top 20 districts sorted by the contribution of post-petition mortgage payments to the
total disbursements made to all creditors. Also shown in percentage terms is the contribution of these
payments to the total secured debt disbursed. Thus, in Pennsylvania Western, post-petition mortgage
payments accounted for almost 70 percent of the payments made to secured creditors and well over half of
the payments made to creditors of all types.

</p><p></p><center><img src="/AM/images/journal/03febbbtnchart6.gif" alt="" align="middle" height="443" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="497"></center>

<p>Note also that among the top 20 disbursing districts shown in Table 4, 11 also appear in Table 6:
Arkansas, Florida Middle and Southern, Georgia Middle, Michigan Eastern and Western, Ohio Southern,
Tennessee Eastern, Middle and Western, and Washington Western. The disbursements of these districts are
significantly affected by post-petition mortgage payments.

</p><h3>Conclusion: How Should These Findings Be Interpreted?<small><sup><a href="#7" name="7a">7</a></sup></small></h3>

<p>Improved reporting systems now used by standing chapter 13 trustees allow the wider bankruptcy
community to understand the opportunities and variability that exist in post-confirmation chapter 13 case
management. The information reported here is just one piece of a larger set of information that should be
much more widely available for analysis and debate. For example, though we now know how much secured
debt is paid, we do not know how these numbers relate to the amounts of unsecured debt that debtors
brought into chapter 13 and then promised to repay through the plan. We do not know with certainty
whether the payment of post-petition debt by trustees increases the debtor's likelihood of completing the
plan,<small><sup><a href="#8" name="8a">8</a></sup></small> nor, as some suggest, whether debtors tend to move for dismissal when their secured debt is paid up.
As more complete data become available, we will gain a better understanding of the myriad factors that
impact chapter 13 operations, and until then, one should be very cautious about drawing conclusions from
the data presented.

</p><hr>
<h3>Footnotes</h3>

<p><small><sup><a href="#1" name="1a">1</a></sup></small> All opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors, and do not necessarily represent the views of the Executive Office for the U.S. Trustees or the
Department of Justice. <a href="#1a">Return to article</a>

</p><p><small><sup><a href="#2" name="2a">2</a></sup></small> Statistics and rankings in this article do not include activity in North Carolina and Alabama, which are not served by the U.S. Trustee Program. With those states
included, the national filing number was 412,272. <a href="#2a">Return to article</a>

</p><p><small><sup><a href="#3" name="3a">3</a></sup></small> Bermant, Gordon, and Flynn, Ed, "Chapter 13 Disbursements in Fiscal Year 2000: Steady Growth," 20 Amer. Bnkry. Inst. J. (November 2001); Bermant, Gordon,
and Flynn, Ed, "Sources of Variability in Chapter 13 Performance," 20 Amer. Bnkry. Inst. J. (April 2001). <a href="#3a">Return to article</a>

</p><p><small><sup><a href="#4" name="4a">4</a></sup></small> The remaining 14 percent were distributed among debtors' attorneys and a number of administrative categories. Of this amount, slightly more than one-third
supported the offices of the standing trustees. <a href="#4a">Return to article</a>

</p><p><small><sup><a href="#5" name="5a">5</a></sup></small> In fact, for many purposes, the best unit of analysis is the single standing chapter 13 trustee and the judge or judges that the trustee serves. <a href="#5a">Return to article</a>

</p><p><small><sup><a name="6">6</a></sup></small> The undetermined category will become negligible as the trustees' software accounting systems are all re-tooled to capture these categories. <a href="#6a">Return to article</a>

</p><p><small><sup><a name="7">7</a></sup></small> For further description of the mortgage-paying practice, <i>see</i> Bermant, Gordon, and Flynn, Ed, "Chapter 13: Who Pays the Mortgage," 20 Amer. Bnkry. Inst. J. (June
2001). <a href="#7a">Return to article</a>

</p><p><small><sup><a name="8">8</a></sup></small> <i>See</i> Meyer, Michael H. and McDonald, Kathleen A., <i>The Payment of Debtors "Ongoing Mortgage Payments" by the Chapter 13 Trustee.</i> Presented at the National
Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys 10th Annual Convention, April 26-28, 2002. <a href="#8a">Return to article</a>

Journal Date
Bankruptcy Rule