An Uneven Match Statutes of Limitations vs. Nondischargeability Actions
Journal Issue
Column Name
Citation
L. Alexandra Hogan, An Uneven Match: Statutes of Limitations vs. Nondischargeability Actions, XXXI ABI Journal 8, 48-49, 98-99, September 2012
Cases Discussed
Ohio v. Kovacs, 469 U.S. 274 (1985); In re Baldwin-United Corp., 48 B.R. 901 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1985); In re Edge, 60 B.R. 690 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 1986); Vanston Bondholders Protective Comm. v. Green, 329 U.S. 156 (1946);Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co. of Am. v. PG&E, 549 U.S. 443 (2007); Resolution Trust Corp. v. McKendry (In re McKendry), 40 F.3d 331 (10th Cir. 1994); Banks v. Gill Distrib. Ctr., Inc. (In re Banks), 263 F.3d 862 (9th Cir. 2001); In re Glunk, 343 B.R. 754 (Bankr. E.D.Pa. 2006); In re Moran, 152 B.R. 493 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1993); In re Boyer, 1999 WL 33954735 at *9 (E.D. Va. Aug. 24, 1999); In re Dunn, 50 B.R. 664 (Bankr. W.D.N.Y. 1985); In re Young, 313 B.R. 555 (Bankr. W.D.N.Y. 2004); In re Claudio, 2012 Bankr. LEXIS 140 (Bankr. D. Mass. Jan. 13, 2012); In re Segre's Iron Works, Inc., 258 B.R. 547 (Bankr. D. Conn. 2001);
Journal Authors
Journal Date
Please sign in to access Journal articles or click here to join ABI.