Assuming Intellectual Property Licenses

In re Catapult Entm’t, Inc., 165 F.3d 747 (9th Cir. 1999); In re CFLC, Inc., 89 F.3d 673, 679-80 (9th Cir. 1996); Gardner v. Nike, Inc., 279 F.3d 774, 779-81 (9th Cir. 2002);Iron & Nail Factory v. Corning, 55 U.S. 193, 14 How. 193, 14 L. Ed. 383, 1852 WL 6762 (1852); Oliver v. Rumford Chemical Works, 109 U.S. 75, 83, 3 S. Ct. 61, 27 L. Ed. 862 (1883); Hapgood v. Hewitt, 119 U.S. 226, 7 S. Ct. 193, 30 L. Ed. 369 (1886);In re CFLC, Inc., 89 F.3d 673, 679-80 (9th Cir. 1996); Stenograph Corp. v. Fulkerson, 972 F.2d 726, 729 n. 2 (7th Cir. 1992); Gilson v. Republic of Ireland, 787 F.2d 655, 658 (D.C. Cir. 1986); Unarco Industries, Inc. v. Kelley Co., Inc., 465 F.2d 1303, 1306 (7th Cir. 1972); Rock-Ola Mfg. Corp. v. Filben Mfg. Co., 168 F.2d 919, 922 (C.C.A. 8th Cir. 1948);In re Golden Books Family Entertainment, Inc., 269 B.R. 300, 309 (Bankr.D.Del. 2001); In re Patient Educ. Media, Inc., 210 B.R. 237 (Bankr. S.D. N.Y. 1997); Harris v. Emus Records Corp., 734 F.2d 1329 (9th Cir. 1984); Gardner v. Nike, Inc., 279 F.3d 774, 779-81 (9th Cir. 2002); v. Avon Publications, 144 F. Supp. 368, 373 (S.D. N.Y. 1956);Summit Inv. & Dev. Corp. v. Leroux, 69 F.3d 608 (1st Cir. 1995); Institut Pasteur v. Cambridge Biotech Corp., 104 F.3d 489 (1st Cir. 1997), abrogated on other grounds Hardemon v. City of Boston, 144 F.3d 24 (1st Cir. 1998); In re Mirant Corp., 440 F.3d 238 (5th Cir.2006);In re Catapult Entm’t, Inc., 165 F.3d 747 (9th Cir. 1999);In re Sunterra Corp., 361 F.3d 257 (4th Cir. 2004); Matter of West Electronics, Inc., 852 F.2d 79 (3d Cir. 1988); Cinicola v. Scharffenberger, 248 F.2d 110, 121 (3d Cir. 2001); In re Sunterra Corp., 361 F.3d 257 (4th Cir. 2004); In re Catapult Entm’t, Inc., 165 F.3d 747 (9thCir. 1999); In re James Cable Partners, L.P., 27 F.3d 534,537 n.6 (11th Cir. 1994);In re Footstar, 323 B.R. 566, 570-72 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2005); In re Adelphia Communications, 359 B.R. 65, 72 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.2007);