In Taggart v. Lorenzen, the justices sounded largely noncommittal, except for the Chief Justice, who seemed in the debtor’s camp favoring a stricter standard for contempt of the discharge injunction.

Conversely, giving notice to a creditor’s state-court counsel may not be adequate, New Jersey judge says.

Judge in Mississippi remands a suit to state court because the notice of removal was filed with the bankruptcy clerk, not the district court clerk.

Judge Hunt in Chicago tells debtors’ counsel to oppose inclusion of unjustifiable provisions in chapter 13 plans, even if it means contested confirmation hearings.

Copious disclosure required for post-petition payment of fees to be permissible in chapter 7.

Are there two tests for the existence of a claim, one test for claims against the debtor and another test for claims by the debtor?

For three independent reasons, Judge Taddonio rules that states are not immune from stripping down or stripping off tax liens.

Bankruptcy Judge Volk, nominated for the district court, rules in favor of the debtor on a question dividing the courts.

The logic of Harris v. Viegelahn doesn’t mean that chapter 13 debtors receive distributions refunded by creditors.

Circuits are split on whether a collection letter only violates the FDCPA if it contains an explicit threat to sue.