May 27, 2021
Circuits Are Now Split on the Constitutionality of the 2018 Increase in U.S. Trustee Fees
The Second Circuit split with the Fourth and Fifth Circuits by holding that the increase in fees for the U.S. Trustee system was unconstitutional because it was not imposed simultaneously in the two states with bankruptcy administrators.
2nd CircuitMay 06, 2021
On Dismissal of a ‘13,’ Barton May (or May Not) Bar Garnishments
Section 1326(a)(2) by itself does not bar garnishment of funds held by a trustee on dismissal before confirmation.
10th CircuitMay 03, 2021
Another Circuit Upholds the 2018 Increase in U.S. Trustee Fees
Dissenters in the Fourth and Fifth Circuits evidently believe that the dual U.S. Trustee/Bankruptcy Administrator system is unconstitutional.
4th CircuitApril 19, 2021
A District Court Rules that the U.S. Trustee Fee Increase Isn’t Retroactive
California district judge sides with the dissenter in the Fifth Circuit in saying that the parallel systems of U.S. Trustees and Bankruptcy Administrators violates the Bankruptcy Clause of the Constitution.
9th Circuit, California, California Central DistrictApril 09, 2021
Judge Isgur Knocks Down a Special Counsel’s Fees for ‘Unprofessional’ Conduct
Incivility may be acceptable in matrimonial matters, but not when the lawyer represents a debtor.
5th Circuit, Texas, Texas Southern DistrictMarch 12, 2021
Trustees Don’t Need a Pecuniary Interest to Have Standing to Appeal, Fifth Circuit Says
Fee allowances aren’t made with the benefit of hindsight, the Fifth Circuit says.
5th CircuitMarch 11, 2021
Reverse Contingencies Are Permissible in Bankruptcy Cases, Judge Olack Says
Compensation in a bankruptcy case can be based on savings to the estate, not only on cash recoveries by the estate.
5th Circuit, Mississippi, Mississippi Southern DistrictMarch 04, 2021
Courts Are Split on Whether Counsel Fees Are Considered in the Chapter 13 Best Interests Test
Deferred payments to unsecured creditors in a chapter 13 plan must equal the present value of the distributions required by the best interests test, Judge Halfenger says.
7th Circuit, Wisconsin, Wisconsin Eastern DistrictMarch 02, 2021
Landlord Socked $606,000 for Opposing Lease Assumption
Fee-shifting clause in the lease entitled the debtor to recover $606,000 in attorneys’ fees from the landlord for opposing lease assumption.
9th Circuit, California, California Central DistrictJanuary 29, 2021
Contested Matters Aren’t ‘Civil Actions’ Under the Equal Access to Justice Act
A contested matter in bankruptcy court isn’t a ‘civil action’ allowing the debtor to recover attorneys’ fees from the U.S. Trustee under the Equal Access to Justice Act.
6th Circuit, Ohio, Ohio Northern District