Skip to main content
ABI Journal

July 31, 2020

Tenth Circuit BAP Says that Section 364(d)(1) Can’t Be Used for Priming Lien in a Plan

In a SARE case, the BAP says that the bankruptcy court cannot deny a lift-stay motion without finding that confirmation is reasonably possible in a reasonable time.

10th Circuit

July 24, 2020

Increasingly Popular SBRA Permits Restructuring Personal Guarantees of Corporate Debt

More than 600 cases have already been filed under the SBRA since subchapter V of chapter 11 became effective in February.

5th Circuit, Louisiana, Louisiana Eastern District

July 23, 2020

Another Workaround Following the Prohibition of Nunc Pro Tunc Orders

The Supreme Court hasn’t prohibited paying counsel fees for services rendered before the entry of a retention order, Judge Preston says.

6th Circuit, Ohio, Ohio Southern District

July 21, 2020

Majority of Courts Still Permit Small-Dollar Avoidance Suits in the Debtor’s Home Court

New York district judge agrees with the ABI Journal: Congress did not succeed in requiring trustees to file small-dollar avoidance actions in the defendant’s district.

2nd Circuit, New York, New York Eastern District

July 17, 2020

Lower Courts Now Disagree on Modifying the Stay Retroactively After Acevedo

Did the Supreme Court’s Acevedo opinion preclude annulling the stay? The Ninth Circuit BAP says ‘no.’

9th Circuit

July 16, 2020

Fraudulent Transfer Suit Didn’t Succeed in ‘Discharging’ Student Loans

Can student loans be wiped out as fraudulent transfers that aren’t dischargeable under Section 523(a)(8)?

4th Circuit, North Carolina, North Carolina Eastern District

July 13, 2020

Three Judges Permit Redesignation under the SBRA, But with Qualifications

The SBRA can be used to extinguish a creditors’ committee previously appointed in a ‘traditional’ chapter 11 case.

4th Circuit, Maryland

July 10, 2020

Eighth Circuit Won’t Impose Unwritten Requirements on Service of a Claim Objection

In the Bankruptcy Rules, a claim objection isn’t treated like a motion for all purposes, the Eighth Circuit says.

8th Circuit

July 09, 2020

Seventh Circuit Requires Court Findings for a Plan Provision the Code Allows

The Seventh Circuit opinion raises the question of whether (or when) a court may restrict the use of a provision in a chapter 13 plan that Section 1322(b) permits.

7th Circuit

July 07, 2020

Subchapter V Isn’t Always an Antidote for a Failing Chapter 11 Reorganization

Misconduct in the prior chapter 11 case barred debtors from proceeding as a small business reorganization under subchapter V of chapter 11.

10th Circuit, Oklahoma, Oklahoma Western District